Comparison and Analysis of Different Standards for Determining Dust Resistivity

被引:1
|
作者
Jin, Xin [1 ]
Zhong, Shengjun [1 ]
Li, Weiye [2 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Sch Met & Mat, 11,Lane 3,Wenhua Rd, Shenyang 110004, Peoples R China
[2] Northeastern Univ, Sch Informat Sci & Engn, Shenyang 110004, Peoples R China
关键词
Dust Resistivity; Electrostatic Prevention; Electrostatic Precipitators; Measurements;
D O I
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.508.110
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Accurate measurement of dust resistivity is important practically for electrostatic prevention and design of electrostatic precipitators. The test result of dust resistivity depends on the standard used. There are three standards widely used for determination of dust resistivity: IEC 1241-2-2, BS 5958-1 and ASME PTC28 4.05. Experimental devices are designed and constructed according to these standards. The schematics of test principles and circuits of different standards are introduced. Experimental results show that dust resistivity values determined by different standards are quite different, and in some cases the difference is even in 1 similar to 2 orders of magnitude. The test results according to IEC standard are the highest, while the results using ASME standard are the lowest. The methods given by IEC standard and BS standard are normally used in electrostatic prevention, while method given by ASME standard is applied to the design of electrostatic precipitators. It is necessary to choose the appropriate standard according to the application of dust resistivity.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dust explosion venting in silos: A comparison of standards NFPA 68 and EN 14491
    Tascon, Alberto
    Aguado, Pedro J.
    Ramirez, Alvaro
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2009, 22 (02) : 204 - 209
  • [22] Comparison of response acceleration methods suggested by different standards
    Liu J.
    Lu X.
    Bao X.
    Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45 (01): : 47 - 56
  • [23] Experimental Comparison of Different Standards for Dynamic Characterization of ADCs
    Balestrieri, Eutalia
    Corrado, Marco
    Daponte, Pasquale
    Rapuano, Sergio
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2009, 58 (05) : 1307 - 1315
  • [24] Comparison of different standards for progressive collapse evaluation procedures
    Saad, A.
    Said, A.
    Tian, Y.
    CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES AND SOLUTIONS IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2010, : 291 - 296
  • [25] DETERMINING COMMUNITY STANDARDS
    BELL, RA
    AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1977, 63 (SEP): : 1202 - 1207
  • [26] DETERMINING ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS
    JOSEPHSO.J
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1974, 8 (05) : 402 - 403
  • [27] MAGNETOPNEUMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF LUNG DUST RETENTION - COMPARISON WITH RADIOTRACER TECHNIQUE AND ANALYSIS OF DUST DISTRIBUTION
    FREEDMAN, AP
    OBERDOERSTER, G
    CHEST, 1982, 82 (02) : 217 - 217
  • [28] Hyposplenism: Comparison of different methods for determining splenic function
    Lammers, A. J. Jolanda
    de Porto, Alexander P. N. A.
    Bennink, Roelof J.
    van Leeuwen, Ester M. M.
    Biemond, Bart J.
    Goslings, J. Carel
    van Marle, Jan
    ten Berge, Ineke J. M.
    Speelman, Peter
    Hoekstra, Joost B. L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2012, 87 (05) : 484 - 489
  • [29] Comparison of different methods for experimental determining the inhomogeneity of thermocouples
    Germanow, Philipp
    Mehring, Patrick
    Neumann, Herbert
    Augustin, Silke
    Froehlich, Thomas
    Krapf, Gunter
    TM-TECHNISCHES MESSEN, 2020, 87 (03) : 146 - 152
  • [30] Comparison of ISO and ASTM standards in determining the flexural strength of denture base resin
    Chander, N. Gopi
    Jayaraman, Venkatraman
    Sriram, Venkat
    EUROPEAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2019, 53 (03) : 137 - 140