Comparison and Analysis of Different Standards for Determining Dust Resistivity

被引:1
|
作者
Jin, Xin [1 ]
Zhong, Shengjun [1 ]
Li, Weiye [2 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Sch Met & Mat, 11,Lane 3,Wenhua Rd, Shenyang 110004, Peoples R China
[2] Northeastern Univ, Sch Informat Sci & Engn, Shenyang 110004, Peoples R China
关键词
Dust Resistivity; Electrostatic Prevention; Electrostatic Precipitators; Measurements;
D O I
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.508.110
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Accurate measurement of dust resistivity is important practically for electrostatic prevention and design of electrostatic precipitators. The test result of dust resistivity depends on the standard used. There are three standards widely used for determination of dust resistivity: IEC 1241-2-2, BS 5958-1 and ASME PTC28 4.05. Experimental devices are designed and constructed according to these standards. The schematics of test principles and circuits of different standards are introduced. Experimental results show that dust resistivity values determined by different standards are quite different, and in some cases the difference is even in 1 similar to 2 orders of magnitude. The test results according to IEC standard are the highest, while the results using ASME standard are the lowest. The methods given by IEC standard and BS standard are normally used in electrostatic prevention, while method given by ASME standard is applied to the design of electrostatic precipitators. It is necessary to choose the appropriate standard according to the application of dust resistivity.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of standards for determining losses and efficiency of three-phase induction motors
    Mzungu, H. M.
    Sebitosi, A. B.
    Khan, M. A.
    2007 IEEE POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION IN AFRICA, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 511 - 516
  • [32] Comparison of Four Standards for Determining Adequate Water Intake of Nursing Home Residents
    Gaspar, Phyllis M.
    RESEARCH AND THEORY FOR NURSING PRACTICE, 2011, 25 (01) : 11 - 22
  • [33] Comparison of Different Methodologies for Determining the Efficiency of Gully Inlets
    Wakif, Sarah Alia Md
    Sabtu, Nuridah
    PROCEEDINGS OF AICCE'19: TRANSFORMING THE NATION FOR A SUSTAINABLE TOMORROW, 2020, 53 : 1275 - 1283
  • [34] COMPARISON OF CROATIAN AND EUROPEAN STANDARDS FOR DETERMINING THE FROST SUSCEPTIBILITY OF HYDRAULICALLY BOUND MIXTURES
    Ovad, Elena
    Barisic, Ivana
    Zagvozda, Martina
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING OSIJEK-E-GFOS, 2014, 9 : 41 - 48
  • [35] A comparison of different techniques for determining the crystallization temperature of slags
    Prapakorn, K
    Seetharaman, S
    Cramb, AW
    84TH STEELMAKING CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 84 : 357 - 368
  • [36] Comparison of Different Carbonate Methods for Determining Calcic Chernozems
    Gorbov, S. N.
    Minaeva, E. N.
    Tagiverdiev, S. S.
    Skripnikov, P. N.
    Nosov, G. N.
    Besuglova, O. S.
    BIOLOGY BULLETIN, 2024, 51 (SUPPL3) : S384 - S394
  • [37] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF DETERMINING SIZE OF AN INFARCTION IN THE DOG
    MARTORANA, PA
    KETTENBACH, B
    GOBEL, H
    NITZ, RE
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 1982, 71 (03): : 161 - 161
  • [39] A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE STABILITY OF MAIZE VARIETIES
    PRASAD, SK
    SINGH, TP
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 1980, 50 (10): : 731 - 733
  • [40] CEN-methods (European standards) for determining plant available nutrients - A comparison
    Baumgarten, A
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON GROWING MEDIA & HYDROPONICS, 2004, (644): : 343 - 349