Bone Regeneration and Docking Site Healing After Bone Transport Distraction Osteogenesis in the Canine Mandible

被引:6
|
作者
Nagashima, Lucy K. [2 ]
Rondon-Newby, Michelle [2 ]
Zakhary, Ibrahim E. [1 ]
Nagy, William W. [2 ]
Zapata, Uriel [3 ]
Dechow, Paul C. [3 ]
Opperman, Lynne A. [3 ]
Elsalanty, Mohammed E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Hlth Sci Univ, Coll Dent Med, Dept Oral Biol, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ Syst, Baylor Coll Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Baylor Coll Dent, Texas A&M Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Biomed Sci, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
ALVEOLAR DISTRACTION; ELASTIC PROPERTIES; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; CONSOLIDATION PERIOD; RECONSTRUCTION; DEFECT; TISSUE; MINERALIZATION; HARDNESS; DEVICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.016
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Bone transport distraction osteogenesis provides a promising alternative to traditional grafting techniques. However, existing bone transport distraction osteogenesis devices have many limitations. The purpose of this research was to test a new device, the mandibular bone transport reconstruction plate, in an animal model with comparable mandible size to humans and to histologically and mechanically examine the regenerate bone. Materials and Methods: Eleven adult foxhounds were divided into an unreconstructed control group of 5 animals and an experimental group of 6 animals. In each animal, a 34-mm segmental defect was created in the mandible. The defect was reconstructed with a bone transport reconstruction plate. Histologic and biomechanical characteristics of the regenerate and unrepaired defect were analyzed and compared with bone on the contralateral side of the mandible after 4 weeks of consolidation. Results: The reconstructed defect was bridged with new bone, with little bone in the control defect. Regenerate density and microhardness were 22.3% and 42.6%, respectively, lower than the contralateral normal bone. Likewise, the anisotropy of the experimental group was statistically lower than in the contralateral bone. Half the experimental animals showed nonunion at the docking site. Conclusion: The device was very stable and easy to install and activate. After 1 month of consolidation, the defect was bridged with new bone, with evidence of active bone formation. Regenerate bone was less mature than the control bone. Studies are underway to identify when the regenerate properties compare with normal bone and to identify methods to augment bone union at the docking site. (C) 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70: 429-439, 2012
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 439
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STUDY OF OSTEOPONTIN EXPRESSION IN THE DISTRACTED BONE AFTER CANINE MANDIBULAR DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS
    Byun, June-Ho
    Park, Bong-Wook
    Sung, Iel-Yong
    Cho, Yeong-Cheol
    Kim, Jong-Ryoul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2006, 32 (05) : 418 - 425
  • [32] Intraoral distraction osteogenesis for bone transport in mandibular reconstruction
    Guerrero, C
    González, M
    Figueroa, F
    [J]. 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF MAXILLOFACIAL AND CRANIOFACIAL DISTRACTION, 2003, : 311 - 316
  • [33] Are Endogenous BMPs Necessary for Bone Healing during Distraction Osteogenesis?
    Alam, Norine
    St-Arnaud, Rene
    Lauzier, Dominique
    Rosen, Vicki
    Hamdy, Reggie C.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 467 (12) : 3190 - 3198
  • [34] Effect of the accordion technique on bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis
    Fu, Ruisen
    Bertrand, David
    Willie, Bettina
    Yang, Haisheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2020, 35 : 147 - 147
  • [35] Bone regeneration in mandibular distraction osteogenesis combined with compression stimulation
    Kim, Uk-Kyu
    Cbung, In-Kyo
    Lee, Kwang-Ho
    Swift, James Q.
    Seong, Wookjin
    Ko, Cbing-Chang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 64 (10) : 1498 - 1505
  • [36] Effects of laser vs ultrasound on bone healing after distraction osteogenesis: A histomorphometric analysis
    Barros Medeiros, Myrla Alves
    Andrade Gomes do Nascimento, Leonard Euler
    Leon Lau, Thiago Chon
    Bezerra Barradas Mineiro, Ana Lys
    Pithon, Matheus Melo
    Sant'Anna, Eduardo Franzotti
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2015, 85 (04) : 555 - 561
  • [37] Quantitative assessment of in vivo bone regeneration consolidation in distraction osteogenesis
    Windhagen, H
    Kolbeck, S
    Bail, H
    Schmeling, A
    Raschke, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2000, 18 (06) : 912 - 919
  • [38] Inhibitory effect of nicotine on bone regeneration in mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Ma, Li
    Zheng, Li Wu
    Cheung, Lim Kwong
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK, 2007, 12 : 3256 - 3262
  • [39] Comparison of canine mandibular bone regeneration by distraction osteogenesis versus acute resection and rigid external fixation
    Gosain, AK
    Kalantarian, B
    Song, LS
    Larson, JD
    Jenkins, CA
    Wilson, CR
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 114 (06) : 1490 - 1499
  • [40] Curvilinear intraoral distraction osteogenesis: Experience in the canine mandible
    Staffenberg, DA
    Williams, JK
    Kumar, AV
    Losken, A
    Wood, RJ
    [J]. CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY 7, 1997, : 343 - 345