Bone Regeneration and Docking Site Healing After Bone Transport Distraction Osteogenesis in the Canine Mandible

被引:6
|
作者
Nagashima, Lucy K. [2 ]
Rondon-Newby, Michelle [2 ]
Zakhary, Ibrahim E. [1 ]
Nagy, William W. [2 ]
Zapata, Uriel [3 ]
Dechow, Paul C. [3 ]
Opperman, Lynne A. [3 ]
Elsalanty, Mohammed E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Hlth Sci Univ, Coll Dent Med, Dept Oral Biol, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ Syst, Baylor Coll Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Baylor Coll Dent, Texas A&M Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Biomed Sci, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
ALVEOLAR DISTRACTION; ELASTIC PROPERTIES; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; CONSOLIDATION PERIOD; RECONSTRUCTION; DEFECT; TISSUE; MINERALIZATION; HARDNESS; DEVICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.016
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Bone transport distraction osteogenesis provides a promising alternative to traditional grafting techniques. However, existing bone transport distraction osteogenesis devices have many limitations. The purpose of this research was to test a new device, the mandibular bone transport reconstruction plate, in an animal model with comparable mandible size to humans and to histologically and mechanically examine the regenerate bone. Materials and Methods: Eleven adult foxhounds were divided into an unreconstructed control group of 5 animals and an experimental group of 6 animals. In each animal, a 34-mm segmental defect was created in the mandible. The defect was reconstructed with a bone transport reconstruction plate. Histologic and biomechanical characteristics of the regenerate and unrepaired defect were analyzed and compared with bone on the contralateral side of the mandible after 4 weeks of consolidation. Results: The reconstructed defect was bridged with new bone, with little bone in the control defect. Regenerate density and microhardness were 22.3% and 42.6%, respectively, lower than the contralateral normal bone. Likewise, the anisotropy of the experimental group was statistically lower than in the contralateral bone. Half the experimental animals showed nonunion at the docking site. Conclusion: The device was very stable and easy to install and activate. After 1 month of consolidation, the defect was bridged with new bone, with evidence of active bone formation. Regenerate bone was less mature than the control bone. Studies are underway to identify when the regenerate properties compare with normal bone and to identify methods to augment bone union at the docking site. (C) 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70: 429-439, 2012
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 439
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Nerve and Vascular Regeneration in Bone Transport Osteogenesis
    Malavia, Veera
    Kontogiorgos, E.
    Elsalanty, M. E.
    Dechow, P. C.
    Opperman, L. A.
    [J]. FASEB JOURNAL, 2010, 24
  • [42] Mechanobiology of Bone Consolidation During Distraction Osteogenesis: Bone Lengthening Vs. Bone Transport
    Pablo Blázquez-Carmona
    Juan Mora-Macías
    Juan Morgaz
    José Andrés Fernández-Sarmiento
    Jaime Domínguez
    Esther Reina-Romo
    [J]. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2021, 49 : 1209 - 1221
  • [43] Systemic regulation of angiogenesis and matrix degradation in bone regeneration - Distraction osteogenesis compared to rigid fracture healing
    Weiss, S
    Zimmermann, G
    Baumgart, R
    Kasten, P
    Bidlingmaier, M
    Henle, P
    [J]. BONE, 2005, 37 (06) : 781 - 790
  • [44] Mechanobiology of Bone Consolidation During Distraction Osteogenesis: Bone Lengthening Vs. Bone Transport
    Blazquez-Carmona, Pablo
    Mora-Macias, Juan
    Morgaz, Juan
    Andres Fernandez-Sarmiento, Jose
    Dominguez, Jaime
    Reina-Romo, Esther
    [J]. ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 49 (04) : 1209 - 1221
  • [45] Docking site surgery in bone transport
    Gonzalez, M.
    Guerrero, C. A.
    Henriquez, M.
    Figueroa, F.
    Dominguez, E.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF MAXILLOFACIAL AND CRANIOFACIAL DISTRACTION, 2006, : 99 - +
  • [46] Distraction osteogenesis [Bone lengthening] of the facial bone
    Al-Ruhaimi, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : B347 - B347
  • [47] Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in bone remodelling following distraction osteogenesis of the sheep mandible
    Marucci, DD
    Yu, Y
    McTavish, J
    Bonar, SF
    Poole, MD
    Walsh, WR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 30 (04) : 208 - 212
  • [48] Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in bone remodelling following distraction osteogenesis of the sheep mandible
    Marucci, D
    Yu, Y
    McTavish, J
    Bonar, F
    Poole, M
    Walsh, W
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES: 2001 DISTRACTION ODYSSEY, 2001, : 23 - 25
  • [49] Effect of teriparatide on bone regenerate after distraction osteogenesis
    Umer, Masood
    Ahmad, Tashfeen
    Habib, Sadia
    Rehman, Rasham
    Ahmed, Mahmood
    Qadir, Irfan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 64 (12) : S3 - S7
  • [50] Biologic model of bone transport distraction osteogenesis and vascular response
    DeCoster, TA
    Simpson, AHRW
    Wood, M
    Li, G
    Kenwright, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1999, 17 (02) : 238 - 245