Bone Regeneration and Docking Site Healing After Bone Transport Distraction Osteogenesis in the Canine Mandible

被引:6
|
作者
Nagashima, Lucy K. [2 ]
Rondon-Newby, Michelle [2 ]
Zakhary, Ibrahim E. [1 ]
Nagy, William W. [2 ]
Zapata, Uriel [3 ]
Dechow, Paul C. [3 ]
Opperman, Lynne A. [3 ]
Elsalanty, Mohammed E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Hlth Sci Univ, Coll Dent Med, Dept Oral Biol, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ Syst, Baylor Coll Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Baylor Coll Dent, Texas A&M Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Biomed Sci, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
ALVEOLAR DISTRACTION; ELASTIC PROPERTIES; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; CONSOLIDATION PERIOD; RECONSTRUCTION; DEFECT; TISSUE; MINERALIZATION; HARDNESS; DEVICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.016
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Bone transport distraction osteogenesis provides a promising alternative to traditional grafting techniques. However, existing bone transport distraction osteogenesis devices have many limitations. The purpose of this research was to test a new device, the mandibular bone transport reconstruction plate, in an animal model with comparable mandible size to humans and to histologically and mechanically examine the regenerate bone. Materials and Methods: Eleven adult foxhounds were divided into an unreconstructed control group of 5 animals and an experimental group of 6 animals. In each animal, a 34-mm segmental defect was created in the mandible. The defect was reconstructed with a bone transport reconstruction plate. Histologic and biomechanical characteristics of the regenerate and unrepaired defect were analyzed and compared with bone on the contralateral side of the mandible after 4 weeks of consolidation. Results: The reconstructed defect was bridged with new bone, with little bone in the control defect. Regenerate density and microhardness were 22.3% and 42.6%, respectively, lower than the contralateral normal bone. Likewise, the anisotropy of the experimental group was statistically lower than in the contralateral bone. Half the experimental animals showed nonunion at the docking site. Conclusion: The device was very stable and easy to install and activate. After 1 month of consolidation, the defect was bridged with new bone, with evidence of active bone formation. Regenerate bone was less mature than the control bone. Studies are underway to identify when the regenerate properties compare with normal bone and to identify methods to augment bone union at the docking site. (C) 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70: 429-439, 2012
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 439
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomechanics of the Canine Mandible During Bone Transport Distraction Osteogenesis
    Zapata, Uriel
    Dechow, Paul C.
    Watanabe, Ikuya
    Elsalanty, Mohammed E.
    Opperman, Lynne A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2014, 136 (11):
  • [2] Architecture and Microstructure of Cortical Bone in Reconstructed Canine Mandibles After Bone Transport Distraction Osteogenesis
    Uriel Zapata
    Emily K. Halvachs
    Paul C. Dechow
    Mohammed E. Elsalanty
    Lynne A. Opperman
    [J]. Calcified Tissue International, 2011, 89 : 379 - 388
  • [3] Architecture and Microstructure of Cortical Bone in Reconstructed Canine Mandibles After Bone Transport Distraction Osteogenesis
    Zapata, Uriel
    Halvachs, Emily K.
    Dechow, Paul C.
    Elsalanty, Mohammed E.
    Opperman, Lynne A.
    [J]. CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 89 (05) : 379 - 388
  • [4] Effects of Piezoelectric Surgery on Bone Regeneration Following Distraction Osteogenesis of Mandible
    Tosun, Emre
    Bilgic, Meric
    Yildirim, Benay
    Tuz, Hakan Hifzi
    Ozer, Taha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 28 (01) : 74 - 78
  • [5] Bone regeneration and fracture healing - Experience with distraction osteogenesis model
    Richards, M
    Goulet, JA
    Weiss, JA
    Waanders, NA
    Schaffler, MB
    Goldstein, SA
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1998, (355) : S191 - S204
  • [6] Controlled bone regeneration in distraction osteogenesis
    Habal, MB
    [J]. CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY 9, 2001, : 161 - 162
  • [7] Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis
    Lisa R. Amir
    Vincent Everts
    Antonius L.J.J. Bronckers
    [J]. Odontology, 2009, 97 : 63 - 75
  • [8] Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis
    Amir, Lisa R.
    Everts, Vincent
    Bronckers, Antonius L. J. J.
    [J]. ODONTOLOGY, 2009, 97 (02) : 63 - 75
  • [9] Autologous Bone Marrow Grafting Combined with Demineralized Bone Matrix Improves Consolidation of Docking Site After Distraction Osteogenesis
    Hatzokos, Ippokratis
    Stavridis, Stavros I.
    Iosifidou, Eirini
    Karataglis, Dimitrios
    Christodoulou, Anastasios
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2011, 93A (07): : 671 - 678
  • [10] Osseointegration of Dental Implants Placed into Canine Mandibular Bone Regenerated by Bone Transport Distraction Osteogenesis
    Kontogiorgos, Elias
    Elsalanty, Mohammed E.
    Zakhary, Ibrahim
    Nagy, William W.
    Dechow, Paul C.
    Opperman, Lynne A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2013, 28 (03) : 677 - 686