Architecture and Microstructure of Cortical Bone in Reconstructed Canine Mandibles After Bone Transport Distraction Osteogenesis

被引:0
|
作者
Uriel Zapata
Emily K. Halvachs
Paul C. Dechow
Mohammed E. Elsalanty
Lynne A. Opperman
机构
[1] Mercer University,Division of Basic Medical Sciences
[2] School of Medicine,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M Health Science Center
[3] Baylor College of Dentistry,Mechanical Engineering Department
[4] Eafit University,Department of Sociology and Anthropology
[5] University of Texas at Arlington,undefined
[6] College of Dental Medicine,undefined
[7] Georgia Health Science University,undefined
来源
关键词
Micro-CT; Histomorphometry; Bone healing; Bone strain; Distraction osteogenesis; Biomechanics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Reconstruction of the canine mandible using bone transport distraction osteogenesis has been shown to be a suitable method for correcting segmental bone defects produced by cancer, gunshots, and trauma. Although the mechanical quality of the new regenerate cortical bone seems to be related to the mineralization process, several questions regarding the microstructural patterns of the new bony tissue remain unanswered. The purpose of this study was to quantify any microstructural differences that may exist between the regenerate and control cortical bone. Five adult American foxhound dogs underwent unilateral bone transport distraction of the mandible to repair bone defects of 30–35 mm. Animals were killed 12 weeks after the beginning of the consolidation period. Fourteen cylindrical cortical samples were extracted from the superior, medial, and inferior aspects of the lingual and buccal plates of the reconstructed aspect of the mandible, and 21 specimens were collected similarly from the contralateral aspect of the mandible. Specimens were evaluated using histomorphometric and micro-computed tomographic techniques to compare their microstructure. Except for differences in haversian canal area, histomorphometric analyses suggested no statistical differences in microstructure between regenerate and control cortical bone. Morphological evaluation suggested a consistent level of anisotropy, possibly related to the distraction vector. After 12 weeks’ consolidation, bone created during bone transport distraction osteogenesis was comparable to native bone in microstructure, architecture, and mechanical properties. It is proposed that, after enough time, the properties of the regenerate bone will be identical to that of native bone.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 388
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Architecture and Microstructure of Cortical Bone in Reconstructed Canine Mandibles After Bone Transport Distraction Osteogenesis
    Zapata, Uriel
    Halvachs, Emily K.
    Dechow, Paul C.
    Elsalanty, Mohammed E.
    Opperman, Lynne A.
    [J]. CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 89 (05) : 379 - 388
  • [2] Immunohistochemical Analysis of Reconstructed Sheep Mandibles: Transport Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Autogenous Bone Grafting
    Cakir-Ozkan, Nilufer
    Eyibilen, Ahmet
    Ozkan, Fatih
    Gulbahar, Mustafa Yavuz
    Kabak, Yonca Betul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 69 (04) : 1248 - 1254
  • [3] Bone Regeneration and Docking Site Healing After Bone Transport Distraction Osteogenesis in the Canine Mandible
    Nagashima, Lucy K.
    Rondon-Newby, Michelle
    Zakhary, Ibrahim E.
    Nagy, William W.
    Zapata, Uriel
    Dechow, Paul C.
    Opperman, Lynne A.
    Elsalanty, Mohammed E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 70 (02) : 429 - 439
  • [4] Biomechanics of the Canine Mandible During Bone Transport Distraction Osteogenesis
    Zapata, Uriel
    Dechow, Paul C.
    Watanabe, Ikuya
    Elsalanty, Mohammed E.
    Opperman, Lynne A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2014, 136 (11):
  • [5] Osseointegration of Dental Implants Placed into Canine Mandibular Bone Regenerated by Bone Transport Distraction Osteogenesis
    Kontogiorgos, Elias
    Elsalanty, Mohammed E.
    Zakhary, Ibrahim
    Nagy, William W.
    Dechow, Paul C.
    Opperman, Lynne A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2013, 28 (03) : 677 - 686
  • [6] Vertical distraction osteogenesis of fibular bone flap in reconstructed mandible
    Eski, Muhitdin
    Turegun, Murat
    Deveci, Mustafa
    Gokce, Hasan Suat
    Sengezer, Mustafa
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2006, 57 (06) : 631 - 636
  • [7] Biomechanical characteristics of cortical bone regenerate after mandibular distraction osteogenesis in dogs
    Zapata, Uriel
    Kontogiorgos, Elias
    Elsalanty, Mohammed E.
    Dechow, Paul C.
    Opperman, Lynne A.
    [J]. FASEB JOURNAL, 2009, 23
  • [8] Distraction osteogenesis after irradiation in rabbit mandibles
    Ma, Yike
    Shen, Guofang
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 50 (07): : 662 - 667
  • [9] IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STUDY OF OSTEOPONTIN EXPRESSION IN THE DISTRACTED BONE AFTER CANINE MANDIBULAR DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS
    Byun, June-Ho
    Park, Bong-Wook
    Sung, Iel-Yong
    Cho, Yeong-Cheol
    Kim, Jong-Ryoul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2006, 32 (05) : 418 - 425
  • [10] Intraoral distraction osteogenesis for bone transport in mandibular reconstruction
    Guerrero, C
    González, M
    Figueroa, F
    [J]. 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF MAXILLOFACIAL AND CRANIOFACIAL DISTRACTION, 2003, : 311 - 316