Accuracy of Real-time Couch Tracking During 3-dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy, Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy, and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Prostate Cancer

被引:31
|
作者
Wilbert, Juergen [1 ]
Baier, Kurt [1 ]
Hermann, Christian [2 ]
Flentje, Michael [1 ]
Guckenberger, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Radiat Oncol, D-97080 Wurzburg, Germany
[2] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Comp Sci Robot & Telemat 7, D-97080 Wurzburg, Germany
关键词
Prostate cancer; Intrafractional uncertainties; Real-time tracking; Phantom study; Intensity modulated radiation therapy; INTRAFRACTION MOTION; RADIOTHERAPY; SYSTEM; FEASIBILITY; TARGETS; MARKER; RECTUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.095
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of real-time couch tracking for prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: Intrafractional motion trajectories of 15 prostate cancer patients were the basis for this phantom study; prostate motion had been monitored with the Calypso System. An industrial robot moved a phantom along these trajectories, motion was detected via an infrared camera system, and the robotic HexaPOD couch was used for real-time counter-steering. Residual phantom motion during real-time tracking was measured with the infrared camera system. Film dosimetry was performed during delivery of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Results: Motion of the prostate was largest in the anteriore-posterior direction, with systematic (Sigma) and random (sigma) errors of 2.3 mm and 2.9 mm, respectively; the prostate was outside a threshold of 5 mm (3D vector) for 25.0%+/- 19.8% of treatment time. Real-time tracking reduced prostate motion to Sigma = 0.01 mm and sigma = 0.55 mm in the anterior-posterior direction; the prostate remained within a 1-mm and 5-mm threshold for 93.9% +/- 4.6% and 99.7%+/- 0.4% of the time, respectively. Without real-time tracking, pass rates based on a gamma index of 2%/2 mm in film dosimetry ranged between 66% and 72% for 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT, on average. Real-time tracking increased pass rates to minimum 98% on average for 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT. Conclusions: Real-time couch tracking resulted in submillimeter accuracy for prostate cancer, which transferred into high dosimetric accuracy independently of whether 3D-CRT, IMRT, or VMAT was used. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 242
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dosimetric Analysis and Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy vs Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Anal Cancer
    Hibbitts, K.
    Chiang, B.
    Ortega, H.
    Herman, T.
    Ahmad, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E623 - E623
  • [22] Comparison of Dosimetric Analysis of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Vs Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Anal Cancer
    Chiang, B.
    Hibbitts, K.
    Ortega, H.
    Herman, T.
    Ahmad, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E305 - E305
  • [23] Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and 3-dimensional conformal therapy for the treatment of T1N0 glottic cancer
    Ekici, Kemal
    Pepele, Eda K.
    Yaprak, Bahaddin
    Ternelli, Oztun
    Eraslan, Aysun F.
    Kucuk, Nadir
    Altinok, Ayse Y.
    Sut, Pelin A.
    Alpak, Ozlem D.
    Colak, Cemil
    Mayadagli, Alpaslan
    Medical Dosimetry, 2016, 41 (04) : 329 - 333
  • [24] INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Obata, S.
    Takatsuki, H.
    Ohta, Y.
    Kan, T.
    Kanegae, S.
    Inoue, Y.
    Matsuo, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S383 - S384
  • [25] Localized Prostate Cancer: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) - Which One is Better?
    Olivera, J.
    Penedo, J. M.
    Marin, J. P.
    Garcia Castejon, M. A.
    Diaz Silvera, C. M.
    Prieto, I.
    Luna, J.
    Vasquez, W. A.
    Perez Casas, A. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S863 - S863
  • [26] Comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy prostate cancer plans accounting for cold spots
    Tran Thi Thao Nguyen
    Hidetaka Arimura
    Ryosuke Asamura
    Taka-aki Hirose
    Saiji Ohga
    Jun-ichi Fukunaga
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2019, 12 : 137 - 148
  • [27] Comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy prostate cancer plans accounting for cold spots
    Tran Thi Thao Nguyen
    Arimura, Hidetaka
    Asamura, Ryosuke
    Hirose, Taka-aki
    Ohga, Saiji
    Fukunaga, Jun-ichi
    RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 12 (02) : 137 - 148
  • [28] Cherenkov imaging during volumetric modulated arc therapy for real-time radiation beam tracking and treatment response monitoring
    Andreozzi, Jacqueline M.
    Zhang, Rongxiao
    Glaser, Adam K.
    Gladstone, David J.
    Jarvis, Lesley A.
    Pogue, Brian W.
    BIOPHYSICS, BIOLOGY, AND BIOPHOTONICS: THE CROSSROADS, 2016, 9719
  • [29] Comparative planning of volumetric modulated arc therapy versus intensity modulated radiation therapy and proton beam therapy in anal cancer
    Hansen, J.
    Wilken, E.
    Petersen, J.
    Serup-Hansen, E.
    Spindler, K. -L.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27 : 62 - 62
  • [30] Economical Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Treatment Using Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy and Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review
    Adel, Amin
    Rezapour, Aziz
    Aboutorabi, Ali
    Kermani, Ali Taghizadeh
    Ghorbani, Hamidreza
    VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2024, 39 : 57 - 65