Statistical planning in confirmatory clinical trials with multiple treatment groups, multiple visits, and multiple endpoints

被引:2
|
作者
Sun, Hengrui [1 ]
Snyder, Ellen [2 ]
Koch, Gary G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, NJ USA
关键词
Closed testing; confirmatory clinical trials; multiple endpoints; multiple treatment groups; multiple visits; multiplicity; ADJUSTMENT METHODS;
D O I
10.1080/10543406.2017.1378664
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Multiplicity issues can be multidimensional: A confirmatory clinical trial may be designed to have efficacy assessed with two or more primary endpoints, for multiple dose groups, and at several post-baseline visits. Controlling for multiplicity in this situation is challenging because there can be a hierarchy with respect to some but not all measurements. If the higher dose is considered more efficacious, multiplicity approach may evaluate the higher dose with higher priority through a fixed sequential testing framework for dose assessments in combination with a Hochberg approach for endpoints. The lower dose is only assessed when the higher dose has significant results, which reduces the power for detecting signals in the lower dose group. However, in some instances the higher dose may associate with tolerability or safety concerns that preclude regulatory approval. A real confirmatory clinical trial with such challenges is provided as an illustrative example. We discuss closed testing procedures based on multi-way averages of comparisons for this complex multiplicity situation through illustrative case analyses and a simulation study. Such strategies manage the higher dose and the lower dose with equal priority, and they enable evaluation of the multiple endpoints at multiple visits collectively with power being reasonably high.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 211
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Design and analysis of group sequential clinical trials with multiple primary endpoints
    Kosorok, MR
    Shi, YJ
    DeMets, DL
    BIOMETRICS, 2004, 60 (01) : 134 - 145
  • [32] A Test for Multiple Binary Endpoints with Continuous Latent Distribution in Clinical Trials
    Ishihara, Takuma
    Yamamoto, Kouji
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 20 (04): : 463 - 480
  • [33] Defining information fractions in group sequential clinical trials with multiple endpoints
    Xu, Tu
    Qin, Qin
    Wang, Xin
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 10 : 77 - 79
  • [34] Resampling-based methods for the analysis of multiple endpoints in clinical trials
    Reitmeir, P
    Wassmer, G
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1999, 18 (24) : 3453 - 3462
  • [35] Testing multiple primary endpoints in clinical trials with sample size adaptation
    Liu, Yi
    Hu, Mingxiu
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2016, 15 (01) : 37 - 45
  • [36] A Test for Multiple Binary Endpoints with Continuous Latent Distribution in Clinical Trials
    Takuma Ishihara
    Kouji Yamamoto
    Journal of Statistical Theory and Applications, 2021, 20 : 463 - 480
  • [37] Closed testing procedures for group sequential clinical trials with multiple endpoints
    Tang, DI
    Geller, NL
    BIOMETRICS, 1999, 55 (04) : 1188 - 1192
  • [38] Multiplicity Adjustment for Clinical Trials With Two Doses of an Active Treatment and Multiple Primary and Secondary Endpoints
    Quan, Hui
    Capizzi, Thomas
    Zhang, Ji
    STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 1 (03): : 258 - 267
  • [39] Statistical Tests Based on New Composite Hypotheses in Clinical Trials Reflecting the Relative Clinical Importance of Multiple Endpoints Quantitatively
    Nishikawa, Masako
    Tango, Toshiro
    Ohtaki, Megu
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 51 (05) : 749 - 762
  • [40] Multiple testings: Multiple comparisons and multiple endpoints
    Chi, GYH
    DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 1998, 32 : 1347S - 1362S