Statistical planning in confirmatory clinical trials with multiple treatment groups, multiple visits, and multiple endpoints

被引:2
|
作者
Sun, Hengrui [1 ]
Snyder, Ellen [2 ]
Koch, Gary G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, NJ USA
关键词
Closed testing; confirmatory clinical trials; multiple endpoints; multiple treatment groups; multiple visits; multiplicity; ADJUSTMENT METHODS;
D O I
10.1080/10543406.2017.1378664
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Multiplicity issues can be multidimensional: A confirmatory clinical trial may be designed to have efficacy assessed with two or more primary endpoints, for multiple dose groups, and at several post-baseline visits. Controlling for multiplicity in this situation is challenging because there can be a hierarchy with respect to some but not all measurements. If the higher dose is considered more efficacious, multiplicity approach may evaluate the higher dose with higher priority through a fixed sequential testing framework for dose assessments in combination with a Hochberg approach for endpoints. The lower dose is only assessed when the higher dose has significant results, which reduces the power for detecting signals in the lower dose group. However, in some instances the higher dose may associate with tolerability or safety concerns that preclude regulatory approval. A real confirmatory clinical trial with such challenges is provided as an illustrative example. We discuss closed testing procedures based on multi-way averages of comparisons for this complex multiplicity situation through illustrative case analyses and a simulation study. Such strategies manage the higher dose and the lower dose with equal priority, and they enable evaluation of the multiple endpoints at multiple visits collectively with power being reasonably high.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 211
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] One-sided tests in clinical trials with multiple endpoints
    Bloch, DA
    Lai, TL
    Tubert-Bitter, P
    BIOMETRICS, 2001, 57 (04) : 1039 - 1047
  • [22] Challenges on Multiple Endpoints in Clinical Trials: An Industry Survey in Japan
    Sakamaki, Kentaro
    Yoshida, Seitaro
    Morita, Yusuke
    Kamiura, Toshifumi
    Iba, Katsuhiro
    Ogawa, Naoyuki
    Suganami, Hideki
    Tsuchiya, Satoru
    Fukimbara, Satoru
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2020, 54 (03) : 528 - 533
  • [23] Challenges on Multiple Endpoints in Clinical Trials: An Industry Survey in Japan
    Kentaro Sakamaki
    Seitaro Yoshida
    Yusuke Morita
    Toshifumi Kamiura
    Katsuhiro Iba
    Naoyuki Ogawa
    Hideki Suganami
    Satoru Tsuchiya
    Satoru Fukimbara
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2020, 54 : 528 - 533
  • [24] How to deal with multiple treatment or dose groups in randomized clinical trials?
    Hothorn, L. A.
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 21 (02) : 137 - 154
  • [25] The impact of allocation bias on test decisions in clinical trials with multiple endpoints using multiple testing strategies
    Schoenen, Stefanie
    Heussen, Nicole
    Verbeeck, Johan
    Hilgers, Ralf-Dieter
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [26] Analysis of Group Randomized Trials with Multiple Binary Endpoints and Small Number of Groups
    Lee, Ji-Hyun
    Schell, Michael J.
    Roetzheim, Richard
    PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (10):
  • [27] Recycling of Significance Levels in Testing Multiple Hypotheses of Confirmatory Clinical Trials
    Huque, Mohammad
    Mushti, Sirisha
    Alosh, Mohamed
    BIOPHARMACEUTICAL APPLIED STATISTICS SYMPOSIUM, VOL 3: PHARMACEUTICAL APPLICATIONS, 2018, : 91 - 118
  • [28] Validation of surrogate endpoints in multiple randomized clinical trials with discrete outcomes
    Renard, D
    Geys, H
    Molenberghs, G
    Burzykowski, T
    Buyse, M
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 44 (08) : 921 - 935
  • [29] Optimizing the order of hypotheses in serial testing of multiple endpoints in clinical trials
    Zhang, Zhiwei
    Wang, Chenguang
    Troendle, James F.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (09) : 1467 - 1482
  • [30] Analyzing multiple endpoints in clinical trials of pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations
    Turk, Dennis C.
    Dworkin, Robert H.
    McDermott, Michael P.
    Bellamy, Nicholas
    Burke, Laurie B.
    Chandler, Julie M.
    Cleeland, Charles S.
    Cowan, Penney
    Dimitrova, Rozalina
    Farrar, John T.
    Hertz, Sharon
    Heyse, Joseph F.
    Iyengar, Smriti.
    Jadad, Alejandro R.
    Jay, Gary W.
    Jermano, John A.
    Katz, Nathaniel P.
    Manning, Donald C.
    Martin, Susan
    Max, Mitchell B.
    McGrath, Patrick
    McQuay, Henry J.
    Quessy, Steve
    Rappaport, Bob A.
    Revicki, Dennis A.
    Rothman, Margaret
    Stauffer, Joseph W.
    Svensson, Ola
    White, Richard E.
    Witter, James
    PAIN, 2008, 139 (03) : 485 - 493