Challenges on Multiple Endpoints in Clinical Trials: An Industry Survey in Japan

被引:2
|
作者
Sakamaki, Kentaro [1 ,2 ]
Yoshida, Seitaro [3 ,4 ]
Morita, Yusuke [3 ,5 ]
Kamiura, Toshifumi [3 ,6 ]
Iba, Katsuhiro [3 ,7 ]
Ogawa, Naoyuki [3 ,8 ]
Suganami, Hideki [3 ,9 ]
Tsuchiya, Satoru [3 ,10 ]
Fukimbara, Satoru [3 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Yokohama City Univ, Ctr Data Sci, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[3] Japan Pharmaceut Manufacturers Assoc, Drug Evaluat Comm, Data Sci Expert Comm, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Chugai Pharmaceut Co Ltd, Clin Informat & Intelligence Dept, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Kyorin Pharmaceut Co Ltd, Clin Data Sci & Affairs, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Nippon Shinyaku Co Ltd, Data Sci Dept, Kyoto, Japan
[7] Otsuka Pharmaceut Co Ltd, Dept Biometr, Tokyo, Japan
[8] Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho Co Ltd, Clin Dev Dept, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[9] Kowa Co Ltd, Clin Data Sci Dept, Tokyo, Japan
[10] Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co Ltd, Data Sci, Tokyo, Japan
[11] Ono Pharmaceut Co Ltd, Data Sci, Osaka, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
multiple endpoints; terminology; determination of endpoint; multiplicity adjustment; industry survey; PHASE-3; MULTICENTER; MELANOMA; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1007/s43441-019-00084-4
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Two issues on clinical trials with multiple endpoints were surveyed: (1) the terminology of multiple endpoints, relationship between rare events and endpoints, and differences in multiplicity adjustment between regions; and (2) the current practice on multiplicity adjustment and sample size calculation. This article provides a summary of the results of a survey on the first issue. Methods: The survey was conducted among 63 members of the Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association from October to November 2017. Results: Thirty-five companies based in Japan and 12 companies based in other countries, 47 companies in total, responded to the survey. The terms co-primary endpoints, secondary endpoint, and composite endpoint were used in a variety of ways. An endpoint for a clinically most important event that is expected to occur rarely differed between regions. Although the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency did not demand multiplicity adjustment, it was considered in clinical trials with multiple endpoints for approval in Japan. Conclusions: The use of terminology differed from the definition in the Food and Drug Administration guidance and the European Medicines Agency guideline. There remain challenges on a clinically most important event that is expected to occur rarely and multiplicity adjustment in clinical trials with multiple endpoints.
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 533
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Challenges on Multiple Endpoints in Clinical Trials: An Industry Survey in Japan
    Kentaro Sakamaki
    Seitaro Yoshida
    Yusuke Morita
    Toshifumi Kamiura
    Katsuhiro Iba
    Naoyuki Ogawa
    Hideki Suganami
    Satoru Tsuchiya
    Satoru Fukimbara
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2020, 54 : 528 - 533
  • [2] Multiplicity Adjustment and Sample Size Calculation in Clinical Trials with Multiple Endpoints: An Industry Survey of Current Practices in Japan
    Kentaro Sakamaki
    Yusuke Morita
    Katsuhiro Iba
    Toshifumi Kamiura
    Seitaro Yoshida
    Naoyuki Ogawa
    Hideki Suganami
    Satoru Tsuchiya
    Satoru Fukimbara
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2020, 54 : 1097 - 1105
  • [3] Multiplicity Adjustment and Sample Size Calculation in Clinical Trials with Multiple Endpoints: An Industry Survey of Current Practices in Japan
    Sakamaki, Kentaro
    Morita, Yusuke
    Iba, Katsuhiro
    Kamiura, Toshifumi
    Yoshida, Seitaro
    Ogawa, Naoyuki
    Suganami, Hideki
    Tsuchiya, Satoru
    Fukimbara, Satoru
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2020, 54 (05) : 1097 - 1105
  • [4] Some remaining challenges regarding multiple endpoints in clinical trials
    Snapinn, Steven
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 36 (28) : 4441 - 4445
  • [5] How to deal with multiple endpoints in clinical trials
    Neuhaeuser, Markus
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 20 (06) : 515 - 523
  • [6] Methodological challenges in the development of endpoints for myelofibrosis clinical trials
    Barosi, Giovanni
    Tefferi, Ayalew
    Gangat, Naseema
    Szuber, Natasha
    Rambaldi, Alessandro
    Odenike, Olatoyosi
    Kroeger, Nicolaus
    Gagelmann, Nico
    Talpaz, Moshe
    Kantarjian, Hagop
    Gale, Robert Peter
    LANCET HAEMATOLOGY, 2024, 11 (05): : e383 - e389
  • [7] Survey Results on Industry Practices and Challenges in Subgroup Analysis in Clinical Trials
    Mayer, Cristiana
    Lipkovich, Ilya
    Dmitrienko, Alex
    STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 7 (04): : 272 - 282
  • [8] Procedures for testing multiple endpoints in clinical trials: An overview
    Wassmer, G
    Reitmeir, P
    Kieser, M
    Lehmacher, W
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 1999, 82 (1-2) : 69 - 81
  • [9] Implementing optimal allocation in clinical trials with multiple endpoints
    Wang, Lu
    Chen, Yong
    Zhu, Hongjian
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2017, 182 : 88 - 99
  • [10] Some statistical methods for multiple endpoints in clinical trials
    Zhang, J
    Quan, H
    Ng, J
    Stepanavage, ME
    CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1997, 18 (03): : 204 - 221