Dosimetric comparison of 3-dimensional conformal and field-in-field radiotherapy techniques for the adjuvant treatment of early stage endometrial cancer

被引:8
|
作者
Yavas, Guler [1 ]
Yavas, Cagdas [2 ]
Acar, Hilal [1 ]
Buyukyoruk, Ahmet [1 ]
Cobanoglu, Gokcen [1 ]
Kerimoglu, Ozlem Secilmis [3 ]
Yavas, Ozlem [4 ]
Celik, Cetin [3 ]
机构
[1] Selcuk Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, TR-42075 Konya, Turkey
[2] Konya Training & Res Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Konya, Turkey
[3] Selcuk Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, TR-42075 Konya, Turkey
[4] Selcuk Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Oncol, TR-42075 Konya, Turkey
来源
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Conformal radiotherapy; Dose-volume histograms; Field-in-field radiotherapy; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; ACUTE HEMATOLOGIC TOXICITY; CERVICAL-CANCER; ADENOCARCINOMA; IRRADIATION; GUIDELINES; PARAMETERS; CARCINOMA; RECTUM; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.11.002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study is to compare field-in-field radiotherapy (FIF) with conformal radiotherapy (CRT) in terms of dosimetric benefits for early stage endometrial cancer patients. Materials and methods: Ten consecutive early stage endometrial cancer patients who underwent adjuvant external beam radiotherapy were included in the study. For each patient, two different treatment plans were created. FIF and CRT plans were compared for doses in the planning target volume (PTV), the organ at risk (OAR) volumes including rectum, bladder, bowel, bilateral femurs and bone marrow, the dose homogeneity index, and the monitor unit counts required for the treatment. Results: The FIF technique significantly reduced the maximum dose of the PTV, rectum, bladder, bowel, left femur, right femur and bone marrow (p values were: <0.001, 0.031, 0.003, <0.001, 0.001, 0.001 and <0.001 respectively). When the OAR volumes irradiated with >30 and >45 Gy were compared, the results were in favor of the FIF technique. The volumes of rectum, bladder, bowel, left femur, right femur and bone marrow receiving more than the prescription dose of 45 Gy were significantly reduced with FIF technique (p values were 0.016, 0.039, 0.01, 0.04, 0.037 and 0.01 respectively). The dose homogeneity index (DHI) was significantly improved with FIF technique (p < 0.001). Conclusions: FIF allowed more homogeneous dose distribution in the PTV and reduced the doses received by OAR. Considering the lower maximum doses in the OAR and PTV, FIF technique seems to be more advantageous than CRT during adjuvant radiotherapy for early stage endometrial cancer patients. (C) 2012 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 582
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dose distribution analysis of axillary lymph nodes for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with a field-in-field technique for breast cancer
    Ohashi, T.
    Takeda, A.
    Shigematsu, N.
    Fukuda, J.
    Sanuki, N.
    Ameniya, A.
    Kubo, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : S177 - S177
  • [42] Dosimetric comparison of 3-dimensional conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques for whole breast irradiation in the prone and supine positions
    Koksal, C.
    Kesen, N. D.
    Akbas, U.
    Kalafat, U.
    Ozkaya, K.
    Okutan, M.
    Fayda, E. M.
    Kucucuk, S.
    Bilge, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2017, 15 (04): : 353 - 362
  • [43] Breast-conserving radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost; field-in-field three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy versus inverse intensity-modulated radiotherapy - A dosimetric comparison: Do we need intensity-modulated radiotherapy?
    Joseph, Bindhu
    Farooq, Nisma
    Kumar, Sabari
    Vijay, C. R.
    Puthur, Kurian J.
    Ramesh, C.
    Lokesh, Vishwanath
    SOUTH ASIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 7 (03) : 163 - 166
  • [44] 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy versus intensity modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: Dosimetric and radiobiologic analysis
    Bhardwaj, A. K.
    Kehwar, T. S.
    Chakarvarti, S. K.
    Oinam, A. S.
    Sharma, S. C.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2007, 5 (01): : 1 - 8
  • [45] A Dosimetric Comparison of 7 Field IMRT, 9 Field IMRT, VMAT and 3-D Conformal Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Localized Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
    Ekici, Kemal
    Kuloglu, Mehmet
    Ata, Aysun Ozsoy
    Atahan, Ozcan
    Tiryakioglu, Osman
    UHOD-ULUSLARARASI HEMATOLOJI-ONKOLOJI DERGISI, 2022, 32 (03): : 133 - 140
  • [46] Comparison of Dosimetric Parameters and Clinical Outcomes in Inversely Planned Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Field-in-Field Forward Planned IMRT for the Treatment of Breast Cancer
    Azharuddin, S. K.
    Kumar, Piyush
    Navitha, S.
    Chauhan, Arvind Kumar
    Kumar, Pavan
    Nigam, Jitendra
    Mehta, Ankita
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [47] Dosimetric Comparison of Radiotherapy Techniques for Treating Early-stage Glottic Larynx Cancer
    Berber, Tanju
    Demirhan, Birhan
    JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MEDICINE-JAREM, 2020, 10 (01): : 16 - 22
  • [48] Inverse Planned Hybrid IMRT versus Field-in-Field (FINF) IMRT for Early Stage Breast Cancer: A Dosimetric Comparison and Preliminary Clinical Experience with Hybrid IMRT
    Kumar, T.
    Loren, K.
    Holt, J.
    Joiner, M.
    Rakowski, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : S647 - S647
  • [49] Comparison between the four-field box and field-in-field techniques for conformal radiotherapy of the esophagus using dose–volume histograms and normal tissue complication probabilities
    Farzaneh Allaveisi
    Amir Nami Moghadam
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2017, 35 : 327 - 334
  • [50] Dosimetric Evaluation of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy and 4-Field 3-D Conformal Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer Treatment
    Uysal, Bora
    Beyzadeoglu, Murat
    Sager, Omer
    Dincoglan, Ferrat
    Demiral, Selcuk
    Gamsiz, Hakan
    Surenkok, Serdar
    Oysul, Kaan
    BALKAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 30 (01) : 54 - 57