Dosimetric comparison of 3-dimensional conformal and field-in-field radiotherapy techniques for the adjuvant treatment of early stage endometrial cancer

被引:8
|
作者
Yavas, Guler [1 ]
Yavas, Cagdas [2 ]
Acar, Hilal [1 ]
Buyukyoruk, Ahmet [1 ]
Cobanoglu, Gokcen [1 ]
Kerimoglu, Ozlem Secilmis [3 ]
Yavas, Ozlem [4 ]
Celik, Cetin [3 ]
机构
[1] Selcuk Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, TR-42075 Konya, Turkey
[2] Konya Training & Res Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Konya, Turkey
[3] Selcuk Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, TR-42075 Konya, Turkey
[4] Selcuk Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Oncol, TR-42075 Konya, Turkey
来源
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Conformal radiotherapy; Dose-volume histograms; Field-in-field radiotherapy; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; ACUTE HEMATOLOGIC TOXICITY; CERVICAL-CANCER; ADENOCARCINOMA; IRRADIATION; GUIDELINES; PARAMETERS; CARCINOMA; RECTUM; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.11.002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study is to compare field-in-field radiotherapy (FIF) with conformal radiotherapy (CRT) in terms of dosimetric benefits for early stage endometrial cancer patients. Materials and methods: Ten consecutive early stage endometrial cancer patients who underwent adjuvant external beam radiotherapy were included in the study. For each patient, two different treatment plans were created. FIF and CRT plans were compared for doses in the planning target volume (PTV), the organ at risk (OAR) volumes including rectum, bladder, bowel, bilateral femurs and bone marrow, the dose homogeneity index, and the monitor unit counts required for the treatment. Results: The FIF technique significantly reduced the maximum dose of the PTV, rectum, bladder, bowel, left femur, right femur and bone marrow (p values were: <0.001, 0.031, 0.003, <0.001, 0.001, 0.001 and <0.001 respectively). When the OAR volumes irradiated with >30 and >45 Gy were compared, the results were in favor of the FIF technique. The volumes of rectum, bladder, bowel, left femur, right femur and bone marrow receiving more than the prescription dose of 45 Gy were significantly reduced with FIF technique (p values were 0.016, 0.039, 0.01, 0.04, 0.037 and 0.01 respectively). The dose homogeneity index (DHI) was significantly improved with FIF technique (p < 0.001). Conclusions: FIF allowed more homogeneous dose distribution in the PTV and reduced the doses received by OAR. Considering the lower maximum doses in the OAR and PTV, FIF technique seems to be more advantageous than CRT during adjuvant radiotherapy for early stage endometrial cancer patients. (C) 2012 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 582
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A planning comparison of 3-dimensional conformal multiple static field, conformal arc, and volumetric modulated arc therapy for the delivery of stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage lung cancer
    Dickey, Mike
    Roa, Wilson
    Drodge, Suzanne
    Ghosh, Sunita
    Murray, Brad
    Scrimger, Rufus
    Gabos, Zsolt
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2015, 40 (04) : 347 - 351
  • [22] Dosimetric comparison of static-field intensity modulated radiotherapy and intensity modulated arc therapy for the adjuvant treatment of endometrial cancer
    Elicin, O.
    Atkovar, G. A.
    Ipek, S.
    Ergen, A. S.
    Karacam, S.
    Sahinler, I.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2015, 191 (01) : 105 - 105
  • [23] Adjuvant radiotherapy in early stage endometrial cancer
    Zuliani, Antonio Carlos
    Cairo, Aurea Akemi
    Barros Esteves, Sergio Carlos
    dos Santos Watanabe, Carla Cristina
    Cunha, Maercio de Oliveira
    de Souza, Gustavo Antonio
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2011, 57 (04): : 438 - 442
  • [24] Determination and comparison of dosimetric parameters of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, field in field, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques in radiotherapy of breast conserving patients
    Takabi, Fatemeh Shirani
    Broomand, Mohammad Ali
    Nickfarjam, Abolfazl
    Asadi, Amin
    Namiranian, Nasim
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 19 (03) : 624 - 632
  • [25] Adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy: dosimetric comparison of conventional versus 3-dimensional planning in endometrial cancer
    Gultekin, Melis
    Yilmaz, Melek Tugce
    Biltekin, Fatih
    Yuce, Deniz
    Sari, Sezin Yuce
    Akyol, Fadil
    Yildiz, Ferah
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2020, 12 (06) : 601 - 605
  • [26] Dose distribution in 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: comparison of femur doses for four treatment techniques
    Karacetin, Didem
    Cakir, Aydin
    Agaoglu, Fulya
    Camlica, Hakan
    Ergen, Arzu
    Dizdar, Yavuz
    Darendeliler, Emin
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2010, 9 (01) : 41 - 51
  • [27] DOSE DISTRIBUTION IN 3-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER: COMPARISON OF FEMUR DOSES FOR FOUR TREATMENT TECHNIQUES
    Karacetin, D.
    Cakyr, A.
    Agaoglu, F.
    Camlyca, H.
    Ergen, A.
    Dizdar, Y.
    Darendeliler, E.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S321 - S321
  • [28] Evaluation of field-in-field, three-field, and four-field techniques for treatment planning of radiotherapy of pancreatic cancer
    Pursamimi, Mohamad
    Ghorbani, Mahdi
    Parwaie, Wrya
    Shakeri, Ahmad
    Meigooni, Ali Soleimani
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 18 (01) : 190 - 199
  • [29] Comparison of 2-Dimensional and 3-Dimensional Conformal Treatment Plans in Gastric Cancer Radiotherapy
    Adas, Yasemin Guzle
    Andrieu, Meltem Nalca
    Hicsonmez, Ayse
    Atakul, Tugba
    Dirican, Bahar
    Aktas, Caner
    Yilmaz, Sercan
    Akyurek, Serap
    Gokce, Saban Cakir
    Ergocen, Salih
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (17) : 7401 - 7405
  • [30] Whole-Pelvic IMRT versus 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy in Adjuvant Treatment of Gynecological Malignancies: Dosimetric Comparison and Evalulation of Acute Toxicities
    Dowlatshahi, Morteza
    Lilja, James
    Manuel, Michael
    Tan, Charlene
    Huan, Lawrence
    Kagan, A. Robert
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2009, 32 (01): : 103 - 104