Laparoscopic versus open surgery for pheochromocytoma: a meta-analysis

被引:24
|
作者
Fu, Sheng-Qiang [1 ]
Wang, Si-Yuan [1 ]
Chen, Qiang [1 ]
Liu, Yu-Tang [1 ]
Li, Zhi-Long [1 ]
Sun, Ting [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Urol, Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopic; Open; Pheochromocytoma; OPEN ADRENALECTOMY; RESECTION; QUALITY; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-020-00824-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Surgical resection is the main treatment for pheochromocytoma (PHEO). Although open surgery (OS) has been shown to be safe and feasible, the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery (LS) for PHEO remain controversial due to the uncertain effects of pneumoperitoneum on haemodynamics and the complexity of the tumour itself. This study was performed to compare the treatment outcomes of OS with those of LS for patients with PHEO. Methods A systematic search through November 11, 2019, was conducted. All studies comparing outcomes of LS and OS for PHEO were included according to eligibility criteria. This meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager Software, version 5.3, and STATA software, version 12.0. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results Fourteen studies involving 626 patients were included in this meta-analysis. LS was associated with lower rates of intraoperative haemodynamic instability (IHD) [odds ratio (OR) = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.00,P = 0.05], less intraoperative blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD) = - 115.27 ml, 95% confidence interval (CI): - 128.54 to - 101.99,P < 0.00001], lower blood transfusion rates [OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.52,P < 0.00001], earlier ambulation (WMD = - 1.57 d, 95% CI: - 1.97 to - 1.16,P < 0.00001) and food intake (WMD = - 0.98 d, 95% CI: - 1.36 to - 0.59,P < 0.00001), shorter drainage tube indwelling time (WMD = - 0.51 d, 95% CI: - 0.96 to - 0.07,P = 0.02) and postoperative stay (WMD = - 3.17 d, 95% CI: - 4.76 to - 1.58,P < 0.0001), and lower overall complication rates (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.88,P = 0.01). However, no significant differences in operative time, postoperative blood pressure control, rates of severe complications, postoperative hypotension or cardiovascular disease (CVD) were found between the two groups. Conclusions LS is safe and effective for PHEO resection. Compared with OS, LS caused less IHD, providing an equal chance to cure hypertension while also yielding a faster and better postoperative recovery.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis
    Wenwu Cai
    Zhide Liu
    Yangyan Xiao
    Weichang Zhang
    Da Tang
    Boran Cheng
    Qinglong Li
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2019, 33 : 3550 - 3557
  • [42] Surgical Management of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Comparative Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery
    Salman, Mohamed AbdAlla
    Issa, Mohamed
    Salman, Ahmed
    Tourky, Mohamed
    Elewa, Ahmed
    Alrahawy, Mahmoud
    Shetty, Neehar
    Elsherbiney, Mohammed
    Elhaj, Mujahid Gasemelseed Fadlallah
    Shaaban, Hossam El-Din
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2022, 32 (05): : 586 - 594
  • [43] Recurrence Kinetics after Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery in Colon Cancer. A Meta-Analysis
    Lilley, Ross
    Chan, Evangeline
    Ng, Nicklaus
    Orr, Amber
    Szostok, Marcin
    Yeh, Gloria Ting Ting
    Tulloch, Ross
    Ramsay, George
    Mokini, Zhirajr
    Forget, Patrice
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (18)
  • [44] Open versus laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of diverticular colovesical fistulas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Trejo-Avila, Mario
    Vergara-Fernandez, Omar
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 91 (09) : E570 - E577
  • [45] Laparoscopic versus open surgery in treating patients with gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Duo
    Xu, Li
    Deng, Xiangling
    Sun, Yongliang
    Zhang, Zihuan
    Wang, Tianxiao
    Wei, Ruili
    Luo, Yingjixing
    Niu, Wenquan
    Yang, Zhiying
    [J]. HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION, 2024, 13 (03)
  • [46] Comparison of clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis
    Cai, Wenwu
    Liu, Zhide
    Xiao, Yangyan
    Zhang, Weichang
    Tang, Da
    Cheng, Boran
    Li, Qinglong
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (11): : 3550 - 3557
  • [47] Laparoscopic versus open surgery catheter placement in peritoneal dialysis patients: A meta-analysis of outcomes
    Abdijalil, Guled
    Shuijuan, Shen
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 32 (05) : 406 - 413
  • [48] Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Colon Cancer: A Meta-analysis of 5-year Outcomes
    Di, B.
    Li, Y.
    Wei, K.
    Shi, J.
    Xiao, X.
    Gao, P.
    Yang, X.
    Cai, H.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 38TH WORLD CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS: IMPROVING THE LIVES OF PATIENTS THROUGH ADVANCES IN SURGERY, 2013, : 25 - 31
  • [49] Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme
    W. R. Spanjersberg
    J. D. P. van Sambeeck
    A. Bremers
    C. Rosman
    C. J. H. M. van Laarhoven
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2015, 29 : 3443 - 3453
  • [50] A meta-analysis of short-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery on colorectal carcinoma
    Tong, Guojun
    Zhang, Guiyang
    Liu, Jian
    Zheng, Zhengzhao
    Chen, Yan
    Cui, Enhai
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (48)