Laparoscopic versus open surgery for pheochromocytoma: a meta-analysis

被引:24
|
作者
Fu, Sheng-Qiang [1 ]
Wang, Si-Yuan [1 ]
Chen, Qiang [1 ]
Liu, Yu-Tang [1 ]
Li, Zhi-Long [1 ]
Sun, Ting [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Urol, Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopic; Open; Pheochromocytoma; OPEN ADRENALECTOMY; RESECTION; QUALITY; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-020-00824-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Surgical resection is the main treatment for pheochromocytoma (PHEO). Although open surgery (OS) has been shown to be safe and feasible, the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery (LS) for PHEO remain controversial due to the uncertain effects of pneumoperitoneum on haemodynamics and the complexity of the tumour itself. This study was performed to compare the treatment outcomes of OS with those of LS for patients with PHEO. Methods A systematic search through November 11, 2019, was conducted. All studies comparing outcomes of LS and OS for PHEO were included according to eligibility criteria. This meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager Software, version 5.3, and STATA software, version 12.0. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results Fourteen studies involving 626 patients were included in this meta-analysis. LS was associated with lower rates of intraoperative haemodynamic instability (IHD) [odds ratio (OR) = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.00,P = 0.05], less intraoperative blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD) = - 115.27 ml, 95% confidence interval (CI): - 128.54 to - 101.99,P < 0.00001], lower blood transfusion rates [OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.52,P < 0.00001], earlier ambulation (WMD = - 1.57 d, 95% CI: - 1.97 to - 1.16,P < 0.00001) and food intake (WMD = - 0.98 d, 95% CI: - 1.36 to - 0.59,P < 0.00001), shorter drainage tube indwelling time (WMD = - 0.51 d, 95% CI: - 0.96 to - 0.07,P = 0.02) and postoperative stay (WMD = - 3.17 d, 95% CI: - 4.76 to - 1.58,P < 0.0001), and lower overall complication rates (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.88,P = 0.01). However, no significant differences in operative time, postoperative blood pressure control, rates of severe complications, postoperative hypotension or cardiovascular disease (CVD) were found between the two groups. Conclusions LS is safe and effective for PHEO resection. Compared with OS, LS caused less IHD, providing an equal chance to cure hypertension while also yielding a faster and better postoperative recovery.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: A meta-analysis
    Sui, Cheng-Jun
    Li, Bin
    Yang, Jia-Mei
    Wang, Shuang-Jia
    Zhou, Yan-Ming
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 35 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [22] Laparoscopic versus open surgery for hepatic cystic echinococcosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ibrahim, Irshat
    Tuerdi, Maimaitituerxun
    Zou, Xiaoguang
    Wu, Yuanquan
    Yasen, Abudoukeyoumu
    Abihan, Yimamu
    Xu, Qilin
    Balati, Mutailipu
    Zhao, Jinming
    Li, Tao
    Tuxun, Tuerhongjiang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (12): : 16788 - 16797
  • [23] Open Versus Laparoscopic Surgery in the Management of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Hayato Nakanishi
    Shahid Miangul
    Rongzhi Wang
    Joe El Haddad
    Nour El Ghazal
    Fatma A. Abdulsalam
    Reem H. Matar
    Christian A. Than
    Benjamin E. Johnson
    Herbert Chen
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2023, 30 : 994 - 1005
  • [24] Short-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery on colon carcinoma: A meta-analysis
    Sun, Jin-Li
    Xing, Su-Yan
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 16 (05) : 4645 - 4659
  • [25] Clinical outcome of open surgery versus laparoscopic surgery for cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a meta-analysis
    Xing, Li
    Guo, Huai-Bin
    Kan, Jin-Long
    Liu, San-Guang
    Lv, Hai-Tao
    Liu, Jian-Hua
    Bian, Wei
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 32 (02) : 239 - 245
  • [26] Laparoscopic and open surgery for pheochromocytoma
    Edwin B.
    Kazaryan A.M.
    Mala T.
    Pfeffer P.F.
    Tønnessen T.I.
    Fosse E.
    [J]. BMC Surgery, 1 (1) : 1 - 5
  • [27] Retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy versus transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Ming
    Wang, Hu
    Guo, Fengran
    Xue, Wenyong
    [J]. VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2023, 18 (01) : 11 - 19
  • [28] Robotic adrenalectomy versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Du, Lei
    Yang, Zhan
    Qi, Jinchun
    Wang, Yaxuan
    [J]. VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2022, 17 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [29] Laparoscopic versus Open Hepatectomy for Hepatolithiasis: a meta-analysis of literatures
    Wang, Genshu
    Li, Hui
    Zheng, Jun
    Zhang, Junbin
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 66 : 232A - 232A
  • [30] Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Yan-Ming Zhou
    Wen-Yu Shao
    Yan-Fang Zhao
    Dong-Hui Xu
    Bin Li
    [J]. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2011, 56 : 1937 - 1943