Laparoscopic versus open surgery for pheochromocytoma: a meta-analysis

被引:24
|
作者
Fu, Sheng-Qiang [1 ]
Wang, Si-Yuan [1 ]
Chen, Qiang [1 ]
Liu, Yu-Tang [1 ]
Li, Zhi-Long [1 ]
Sun, Ting [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Urol, Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopic; Open; Pheochromocytoma; OPEN ADRENALECTOMY; RESECTION; QUALITY; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-020-00824-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Surgical resection is the main treatment for pheochromocytoma (PHEO). Although open surgery (OS) has been shown to be safe and feasible, the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery (LS) for PHEO remain controversial due to the uncertain effects of pneumoperitoneum on haemodynamics and the complexity of the tumour itself. This study was performed to compare the treatment outcomes of OS with those of LS for patients with PHEO. Methods A systematic search through November 11, 2019, was conducted. All studies comparing outcomes of LS and OS for PHEO were included according to eligibility criteria. This meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager Software, version 5.3, and STATA software, version 12.0. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results Fourteen studies involving 626 patients were included in this meta-analysis. LS was associated with lower rates of intraoperative haemodynamic instability (IHD) [odds ratio (OR) = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.00,P = 0.05], less intraoperative blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD) = - 115.27 ml, 95% confidence interval (CI): - 128.54 to - 101.99,P < 0.00001], lower blood transfusion rates [OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.52,P < 0.00001], earlier ambulation (WMD = - 1.57 d, 95% CI: - 1.97 to - 1.16,P < 0.00001) and food intake (WMD = - 0.98 d, 95% CI: - 1.36 to - 0.59,P < 0.00001), shorter drainage tube indwelling time (WMD = - 0.51 d, 95% CI: - 0.96 to - 0.07,P = 0.02) and postoperative stay (WMD = - 3.17 d, 95% CI: - 4.76 to - 1.58,P < 0.0001), and lower overall complication rates (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.88,P = 0.01). However, no significant differences in operative time, postoperative blood pressure control, rates of severe complications, postoperative hypotension or cardiovascular disease (CVD) were found between the two groups. Conclusions LS is safe and effective for PHEO resection. Compared with OS, LS caused less IHD, providing an equal chance to cure hypertension while also yielding a faster and better postoperative recovery.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Meta-analysis of the laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery within fast track surgery
    Zhao, Jun-hua
    Sun, Jing-xu
    Huang, Xuan-zhang
    Gao, Peng
    Chen, Xiao-wan
    Song, Yong-xi
    Liu, Jing
    Cai, Cheng-zhe
    Xu, Hui-mian
    Wang, Zhen-ning
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2016, 31 (03) : 613 - 622
  • [12] A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Open Surgery for Gallbladder Cancer
    Karjol, Uday
    Jonnada, Pavan
    Anwar, Ali Zaid
    Chandranath, Ajay
    Cheruku, Sushama
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 15 (SUPPL 2) : 218 - 225
  • [13] Meta-analysis of the laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery within fast track surgery
    Jun-hua Zhao
    Jing-xu Sun
    Xuan-zhang Huang
    Peng Gao
    Xiao-wan Chen
    Yong-xi Song
    Jing Liu
    Cheng-zhe Cai
    Hui-mian Xu
    Zhen-ning Wang
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2016, 31 : 613 - 622
  • [14] A meta-analysis of laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer
    Song, Xiao-Jun
    Liu, Zhi-Li
    Zeng, Rong
    Ye, Wei
    Liu, Chang-Wei
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (17)
  • [15] LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN HEPATECTOMY: A META-ANALYSIS
    Soloviy, M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 21 : 93 - 93
  • [16] Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy
    Hall, NJ
    Van Der Zee, J
    Tan, HL
    Pierro, A
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (05) : 774 - 778
  • [17] Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colonoscopic perforation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhong, Wu
    Liu, Chuanyuan
    Fang, Chuanfa
    Zhang, Lei
    He, Xianping
    Zhu, Weiquan
    Guan, Xueyun
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (24) : E34057
  • [18] The Humoral Response After Laparoscopic Versus Open Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis
    Sammour, Tarik
    Kahokehr, Arman
    Chan, Sophie
    Booth, Roger J.
    Hill, Andrew G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 164 (01) : 28 - 37
  • [19] Robotic versus Laparoscopic versus Open Gastrectomy: A Meta-Analysis
    Marano, Alessandra
    Choi, Yoon Young
    Hyung, Woo Jin
    Kim, Yoo Min
    Kim, Jieun
    Noh, Sung Hoon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTRIC CANCER, 2013, 13 (03) : 136 - 148
  • [20] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children - A meta-analysis
    Aziz, O
    Athanasiou, T
    Tekkis, PP
    Purkayastha, S
    Haddow, J
    Malinovski, V
    Paraskeva, P
    Darzi, A
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 243 (01) : 17 - 27