Laparoscopic versus open surgery for pheochromocytoma: a meta-analysis

被引:24
|
作者
Fu, Sheng-Qiang [1 ]
Wang, Si-Yuan [1 ]
Chen, Qiang [1 ]
Liu, Yu-Tang [1 ]
Li, Zhi-Long [1 ]
Sun, Ting [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Urol, Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopic; Open; Pheochromocytoma; OPEN ADRENALECTOMY; RESECTION; QUALITY; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-020-00824-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Surgical resection is the main treatment for pheochromocytoma (PHEO). Although open surgery (OS) has been shown to be safe and feasible, the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery (LS) for PHEO remain controversial due to the uncertain effects of pneumoperitoneum on haemodynamics and the complexity of the tumour itself. This study was performed to compare the treatment outcomes of OS with those of LS for patients with PHEO. Methods A systematic search through November 11, 2019, was conducted. All studies comparing outcomes of LS and OS for PHEO were included according to eligibility criteria. This meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager Software, version 5.3, and STATA software, version 12.0. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results Fourteen studies involving 626 patients were included in this meta-analysis. LS was associated with lower rates of intraoperative haemodynamic instability (IHD) [odds ratio (OR) = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.00,P = 0.05], less intraoperative blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD) = - 115.27 ml, 95% confidence interval (CI): - 128.54 to - 101.99,P < 0.00001], lower blood transfusion rates [OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.52,P < 0.00001], earlier ambulation (WMD = - 1.57 d, 95% CI: - 1.97 to - 1.16,P < 0.00001) and food intake (WMD = - 0.98 d, 95% CI: - 1.36 to - 0.59,P < 0.00001), shorter drainage tube indwelling time (WMD = - 0.51 d, 95% CI: - 0.96 to - 0.07,P = 0.02) and postoperative stay (WMD = - 3.17 d, 95% CI: - 4.76 to - 1.58,P < 0.0001), and lower overall complication rates (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.88,P = 0.01). However, no significant differences in operative time, postoperative blood pressure control, rates of severe complications, postoperative hypotension or cardiovascular disease (CVD) were found between the two groups. Conclusions LS is safe and effective for PHEO resection. Compared with OS, LS caused less IHD, providing an equal chance to cure hypertension while also yielding a faster and better postoperative recovery.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic versus open surgery for pheochromocytoma: a meta-analysis
    Sheng-Qiang Fu
    Si-Yuan Wang
    Qiang Chen
    Yu-Tang Liu
    Zhi-Long Li
    Ting Sun
    [J]. BMC Surgery, 20
  • [2] Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis
    Aziz, O
    Constantinides, V
    Tekkis, PP
    Athanasiou, T
    Purkayastha, S
    Paraskeva, P
    Darzi, AW
    Heriot, AG
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 13 (03) : 413 - 424
  • [3] Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Omer Aziz
    Vasilis Constantinides
    Paris P. Tekkis
    Thanos Athanasiou
    Sanjay Purkayastha
    Paraskevas Paraskeva
    Ara W. Darzi
    Alexander G. Heriot
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2006, 13 : 413 - 424
  • [4] Robotic and laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis
    Da Silva Vieira, Laynara Vitoria
    Kang, Mee Joo
    Roschel, Marina Marangoni
    Krug, Alana Bruna
    Dornelas, Luana
    Gomes, Monique Vilela
    Squisatti, Camile Fernanda
    Peterson, Yasmin Alves
    Meneses, Beatriz
    Rodrigues Peixoto, Maria Eduarda
    Cavalcanti Souza, Maria Eduarda
    Carvalho, Luiza
    Costa, Vitoria Donadoni
    Rabeschini, Joao Miguel
    de Oliveira, Carolina Furtado
    Rutkowski, Isabela
    de Souza, Beatriz Meyer
    de Aguiar Tavares, Marcella Eduarda
    Luciano Santos, Heloisa Griese
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (16)
  • [5] Laparoscopic versus open surgery resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis
    Coratti, F.
    Coratti, A.
    Malatesti, R.
    Testi, W.
    Tani, F.
    [J]. GIORNALE DI CHIRURGIA, 2009, 30 (8-9): : 377 - 384
  • [6] Laparoscopic versus open surgery in children with choledochal cysts: a meta-analysis
    Shen, Huo-Jian
    Xu, Ming
    Zhu, Hong-Yi
    Yang, Chao
    Li, Fu
    Li, Ke-wei
    Shi, Wei-Jin
    Ji, Fu
    [J]. PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 31 (06) : 529 - 534
  • [7] Laparoscopic versus open surgery in children with choledochal cysts: a meta-analysis
    Huo-Jian Shen
    Ming Xu
    Hong-Yi Zhu
    Chao Yang
    Fu Li
    Ke-wei Li
    Wei-Jin Shi
    Fu Ji
    [J]. Pediatric Surgery International, 2015, 31 : 529 - 534
  • [8] Laparoscopic versus Open Obesity Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Pulmonary Complications
    Antoniou, Stavros Athanasios
    Antoniou, George Athanasios
    Koch, Oliver Owen
    Koehler, Gernot
    Pointner, Rudolph
    Granderath, Frank-Alexander
    [J]. DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 32 (02) : 98 - 107
  • [9] Laparoscopic versus open surgery in the treatment of hepatic hemangioma A meta-analysis
    He Jien
    Li Xiaohua
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (08) : E24155
  • [10] Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Diverticulitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wu, Kuen-Lin
    Lee, Ko-Chao
    Liu, Chia-Cheng
    Chen, Hong-Hwa
    Lu, Chien-Chang
    [J]. DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 34 (03) : 203 - 215