Hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach to select appropriate biomass resources for biofuel production

被引:52
|
作者
Firouzi, Saeed [1 ]
Allahyari, Mohammad Sadegh [2 ]
Isazadeh, Mohammadreza [2 ]
Nikkhah, Amin [3 ,4 ]
Van Haute, Sam [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Coll Agr, Dept Agron, Rasht Branch, Rasht, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Agr Management, Rasht Branch, Rasht, Iran
[3] Univ Ghent, Fac Biosci Engn, Dept Food Technol Safety & Hlth, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[4] Univ Ghent, Dept Environm Technol Food Technol & Mol Biotechn, Global Campus, Incheon, South Korea
关键词
Biomass; Biofuel; Renewable; Waste to energy; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; SUPPLY CHAIN; ELECTRICITY; MANAGEMENT; LANDFILL; SYSTEM; ALGAE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144449
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biofuel generation from local biomass resources can significantly contribute to greenhouse gas mitigation and cleaner energy production. In this regard, a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach was employed to prioritize appropriate biomass resources for biofuel production. Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS), andWeighted Aggregates SumProduct Assessment (WASPAS) were the employed MCDM approaches. Subsequently, ranking aggregation methods, i.e., Borda, Copeland, and Rank Mean, were applied to integrate the rankings obtained from the MCDM approaches. Guilan province of Iranwas selected as a case study based on its promising potential for biofuel production from first-, second-, and third-generation biofuel resources. Initially, through an in-depth review of the literature and the use of academic professors' expert opinions, ten criteriawere selected as the evaluation indices of the study: 1) creating technical side jobs, 2) preserving non-renewable energy resources, 3) relative advantage of biofuel production, 4) complexity of biofuel production process, 5) cost of the biomass conversion process, 6) biomass reusability, 7) cost of biomass supply, 8) environmental impacts of biomass accumulation, 9) adaptability of the biofuel production process to the size of biomass production units and the attitude and knowledge of the producers, and 10) energy self-sufficiency of the biomass producer. Moreover, the 11 investigated potential sources of biofuel production were rice, peanut, livestock and poultry wastes, rice waste, peanut waste, tea residues and its processing wastes, olive residues and its processing wastes, livestock and poultry slaughter and farm-raised fish wastes, municipal solid waste and sewage, forest and wood farming wastes, algae and Azolla. The results indicated that "municipal solidwastes and sewage", "forest and wood farmingwastes" and "livestock and poultry wastes" from the second-generation biofuels were identified as the most important biomass resources in the studied area. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An Application of a Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach in Managing Equipment Hazards in Woodworking
    Selerio E.F., Jr.
    Arcadio R.D.
    Medio G.J.
    Nacua M.A.
    Pedregosa G.A.
    Selerio, Egberto F. (20102931@usc.edu.ph), 1600, International Information and Engineering Technology Association (10): : 517 - 527
  • [42] Multi-criteria decision-making process for buildings
    Barcomb, JD
    Curtner, A
    35TH INTERSOCIETY ENERGY CONVERSION ENGINEERING CONFERENCE & EXHIBIT (IECEC), VOLS 1 AND 2, TECHNICAL PAPERS, 2000, : 528 - 535
  • [43] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making with Linguistic Labels
    Mieszkowicz-Rolka, Alicja
    Rolka, Leszek
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 17TH CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS (FEDCSIS), 2022, : 263 - 267
  • [44] The stratified multi-criteria decision-making method
    Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2018, 162 : 115 - 123
  • [45] Multi-criteria optimization and decision-making in radiotherapy
    Breedveld, Sebastiaan
    Craft, David
    van Haveren, Rens
    Heijmen, Ben
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 277 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [46] CONSIDERING INTERACTIONS IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    Cancer, Vesna
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOR 09, 2009, : 151 - 156
  • [47] Multi-criteria Decision-making in Urban Planning
    Kilnarova, Pavla
    6TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM, 2017, : 94 - 100
  • [48] Handling veracity in multi-criteria decision-making: A multi-dimensional approach
    De Tre, Guy
    De Mol, Robin
    Bronselaer, Antoon
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2018, 460 : 541 - 554
  • [49] Advanced multi-criteria decision-making technique to describe the relationship between criteria and select optimal alternatives
    Chau Thi Diem Le
    Judit Oláh
    Miklós Pakurár
    Soft Computing, 2024, 28 (23) : 13107 - 13125
  • [50] Selection of biomass materials for bio-oil yield: a hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach
    Madhu, Petchimuthu
    Kumar, Chenniappan Nithiyesh
    Anojkumar, Loganathan
    Matheswaran, Murugesan
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2018, 20 (06) : 1377 - 1384