Hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach to select appropriate biomass resources for biofuel production

被引:52
|
作者
Firouzi, Saeed [1 ]
Allahyari, Mohammad Sadegh [2 ]
Isazadeh, Mohammadreza [2 ]
Nikkhah, Amin [3 ,4 ]
Van Haute, Sam [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Coll Agr, Dept Agron, Rasht Branch, Rasht, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Agr Management, Rasht Branch, Rasht, Iran
[3] Univ Ghent, Fac Biosci Engn, Dept Food Technol Safety & Hlth, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[4] Univ Ghent, Dept Environm Technol Food Technol & Mol Biotechn, Global Campus, Incheon, South Korea
关键词
Biomass; Biofuel; Renewable; Waste to energy; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; SUPPLY CHAIN; ELECTRICITY; MANAGEMENT; LANDFILL; SYSTEM; ALGAE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144449
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biofuel generation from local biomass resources can significantly contribute to greenhouse gas mitigation and cleaner energy production. In this regard, a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach was employed to prioritize appropriate biomass resources for biofuel production. Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS), andWeighted Aggregates SumProduct Assessment (WASPAS) were the employed MCDM approaches. Subsequently, ranking aggregation methods, i.e., Borda, Copeland, and Rank Mean, were applied to integrate the rankings obtained from the MCDM approaches. Guilan province of Iranwas selected as a case study based on its promising potential for biofuel production from first-, second-, and third-generation biofuel resources. Initially, through an in-depth review of the literature and the use of academic professors' expert opinions, ten criteriawere selected as the evaluation indices of the study: 1) creating technical side jobs, 2) preserving non-renewable energy resources, 3) relative advantage of biofuel production, 4) complexity of biofuel production process, 5) cost of the biomass conversion process, 6) biomass reusability, 7) cost of biomass supply, 8) environmental impacts of biomass accumulation, 9) adaptability of the biofuel production process to the size of biomass production units and the attitude and knowledge of the producers, and 10) energy self-sufficiency of the biomass producer. Moreover, the 11 investigated potential sources of biofuel production were rice, peanut, livestock and poultry wastes, rice waste, peanut waste, tea residues and its processing wastes, olive residues and its processing wastes, livestock and poultry slaughter and farm-raised fish wastes, municipal solid waste and sewage, forest and wood farming wastes, algae and Azolla. The results indicated that "municipal solidwastes and sewage", "forest and wood farmingwastes" and "livestock and poultry wastes" from the second-generation biofuels were identified as the most important biomass resources in the studied area. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An Innovative Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach under Picture Fuzzy Information
    Ali, Ghous
    Ul Abidin, Muhammad Zain
    Xin, Qin
    Tawfiq, Ferdous M. O.
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2022, 14 (11):
  • [22] Using multi-criteria decision-making methods to select the best location for the construction of a biomass power plant in Iran
    Reza Shahraki Shahdabadi
    Akbar Maleki
    S. Haghighat
    Mohammad Ghalandari
    Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2021, 145 : 2105 - 2122
  • [23] A novel hybrid spherical fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach to select the best hydroelectric power plant source in India
    Sahoo, Brajamohan
    Debnath, Bijoy Krishna
    RENEWABLE ENERGY FOCUS, 2024, 51
  • [24] Application of hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach to analyze wastewater microalgae culture systems for bioenergy production
    Liu, Weixing
    Liu, Aozhan
    Qin, Huan
    Yan, Yixin
    Fu, Dafang
    Singh, Rajendra Prasad
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 256
  • [25] Development of a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for sustainability evaluation of bioenergy production technologies: A case study
    Abdel-Basset, Mohamed
    Gamal, Abduallah
    Chakrabortty, Ripon K.
    Ryan, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 290
  • [26] Integrated process capability and multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Cansu Dağsuyu
    Ulviye Polat
    Ali Kokangül
    Soft Computing, 2021, 25 : 7169 - 7180
  • [27] Multi-criteria linguistic interval group decision-making approach
    Wang Jianqiang & Chen Xiaohong School of Business
    Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2008, (05) : 934 - 938
  • [28] Multi-criteria linguistic interval group decision-making approach*
    School of Business, Central South Univ., Changsha, 410083, China
    J Syst Eng Electron, 2008, 5 (934-938):
  • [29] Multi-criteria linguistic interval group decision-making approach
    Wang Jianqiang
    Chen Xiaohong
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND ELECTRONICS, 2008, 19 (05) : 934 - 938
  • [30] Integrated process capability and multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Dagsuyu, Cansu
    Polat, Ulviye
    Kokangul, Ali
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 25 (10) : 7169 - 7180