A Field of Expertise, the Organization, or Science Itself? Scientists' Perception of Representing Research in Public Communication

被引:59
|
作者
Horst, Maja [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Media Cognit & Commun, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
关键词
communicating science; representation; scientific organizations; motivation; expertise; branding; enlightenment; ENGAGEMENT; IDENTITY; KNOWLEDGE; IMAGE;
D O I
10.1177/1075547013487513
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Social and political interest in science regularly prompts scientists to assume the role of public spokesperson. The article investigates this role of representing science as both speaking on behalf of science and symbolically standing for science and its organizations. With inspiration from the field of organizational communication, it is argued that science communication should be considered as an activity intimately linked with perceptions of identity and organizational culture. When scientists communicate publicly, they do not just disseminate knowledge, they also represent a particular sense making about what science, scientists, and scientific organizations are. Based on a qualitative analysis of 20 leading Danish scientists' views on their own role in public communication, three different modes of representation are identified: Expert, Research Manager, and Guardian of Science. Each of these modes of representation implies particular notions of quality, audience, motivation, and learning in science communication.
引用
收藏
页码:758 / 779
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Boundary-Work in the Health Research Field: Biomedical and Clinician Scientists' Perceptions of Social Science Research
    Albert, Mathieu
    Laberge, Suzanne
    Hodges, Brian D.
    MINERVA, 2009, 47 (02) : 171 - 194
  • [42] Communication about scientific uncertainty: How scientists and science journalists deal with uncertainties in nanoparticle research
    Heidmann I.
    Milde J.
    Environmental Sciences Europe, 2013, 25 (01)
  • [43] Improving the usability of research on the public perception of science and technology for policy-making
    Hisschemöller, M
    Midden, CJH
    PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 1999, 8 (01) : 17 - 33
  • [44] Public perception of science: Research results from Argentina, Brazil, Spain and Uruguay
    Bauer, MW
    PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2004, 13 (03) : 323 - 325
  • [45] Scholarly communication or public communication of science? Assessing who engage with climate change research on Twitter
    Toupin, Rémi
    Millerand, Florence
    Larivière, Vincent
    17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2019 - Proceedings, 2019, 2 : 2115 - 2120
  • [46] Scholarly communication or public communication of science? Assessing who engage with climate change research on Twitter
    Toupin, Remi
    Millerand, Florence
    Lariviere, Vincent
    17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENTOMETRICS & INFORMETRICS (ISSI2019), VOL II, 2019, : 2115 - 2120
  • [47] THE USE OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR ORGANIZATION OF RESEARCH WORK OF FUTURE COMPUTER SCIENCE TEACHERS
    Minhalova, Yuliia, I
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND LEARNING TOOLS, 2021, 85 (05) : 175 - 188
  • [48] RESEARCH IN PUBLIC COMMUNICATION OF SCIENCE: ITS BEHAVIOR IN SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS IN THE DIMENSIONS DATABASE
    Barcelo-Hidalgo, Mayre
    Davila-Lorenzo, Marianela
    REVISTA UNIVERSIDAD Y SOCIEDAD, 2024, 16 (04): : 528 - 537
  • [49] Communication of science 2.0 in Spain: The role of public research centres and digital media
    Lopez-Perez, Lourdes
    Olvera-Lobo, Maria-Dolores
    REVISTA MEDITERRANEA COMUNICACION-JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2015, 6 (02): : 165 - 179
  • [50] DISTINGUISHING SCIENCE COMMUNICATION & POPULARIZATION FROM RESEARCH-BASED PUBLIC INTERVENTIONS
    Vanlee, Florian
    Ysebaert, Walter
    Jonker, Hans
    18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENTOMETRICS & INFORMETRICS (ISSI2021), 2021, : 1181 - 1186