Scholarly communication or public communication of science? Assessing who engage with climate change research on Twitter

被引:0
|
作者
Toupin, Remi [1 ]
Millerand, Florence [2 ,3 ]
Lariviere, Vincent [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Quebec Montreal, CIRST, Lab Commun & Digital, LabCMO, Case Postale 8888,Succursale Ctr Ville, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada
[2] Univ Quebec Montreal, CIRST, Dept Commun Sociale & Publ, CP 8888,Succ Ctr Ville, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada
[3] Univ Quebec Montreal, CIRST, Lab Commun & Digital LabCMO, CP 8888,Succ Ctr Ville, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada
[4] Univ Montreal, Ecole Bibliothecon & Sci Informat, CP 6128,Succ Ctr Ville, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[5] Univ Quebec Montreal, CIRST, Observ Sci & Technol, CP 8888,Succ Ctr Ville, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada
关键词
TWEETS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The aim of this research is to build a methodological framework for the identification of users engaging with scholarly productions on Twitter by focusing on their Twitter bios. Based on a corpus of 4 719 research papers, 41 019 tweets and 21 965 unique users engaging with climate change research from 2015 and 2016, we are developing a codebook, by manual and semi-automatic coding of these bios, for the identification for seven types of accounts - 1) Faculty members and students; 2) Institutions and organizations; 3) Bots and automated accounts; 4) Journals and publishers; 5) Communicators; 6) Professionals; 7) Personal. As this work focus on public engagement with science, our focus is on the identification of lay users, defined as those using only Personal expressions in their bios. Preliminary results based on the first iteration of the codebook lead the categorization of 12 415 accounts, 5 949 of them including Personal expressions. However, results also indicate a significant overlap with other categories, especially Faculty members and students (n =1 782). Future work will focus on refining the codebook for further analysis and manual coding to more accurately measure the precision of these results.
引用
收藏
页码:2115 / 2120
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Scholarly communication or public communication of science? Assessing who engage with climate change research on Twitter
    Toupin, Rémi
    Millerand, Florence
    Larivière, Vincent
    [J]. 17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2019 - Proceedings, 2019, 2 : 2115 - 2120
  • [3] Science Twitter — navigating change in science communication
    Robert Insall
    [J]. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2023, 24 : 305 - 306
  • [4] Twitter as a research tool in science communication
    Denia, Elena
    [J]. REVISTA MEDITERRANEA COMUNICACION-JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2021, 12 (01): : 289 - 301
  • [5] Editorial: 'Jargon' in scholarly and public science communication
    Peters, Hans Peter
    [J]. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2020, 29 (06) : 560 - 560
  • [6] Conflating scholarly and science communication practices: the production of open letters on climate change
    Graminius, Carin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2020, 76 (06) : 1359 - 1375
  • [7] Gender differences in the climate change communication on Twitter
    Holmberg, Kim
    Hellsten, Iina
    [J]. INTERNET RESEARCH, 2015, 25 (05) : 811 - 828
  • [8] Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication
    Kim Holmberg
    Mike Thelwall
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101 : 1027 - 1042
  • [9] Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication
    Holmberg, Kim
    Thelwall, Mike
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2014, 101 (02) : 1027 - 1042
  • [10] DISCIPLINARY DIFFERENCES IN TWITTER SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION
    Holmberg, Kim
    Thelwall, Mike
    [J]. 14TH INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS CONFERENCE (ISSI), 2013, : 567 - 582