Comparison of hydrophone calibration by reciprocity and heterodyne interferometer in the frequency range 500 kHz to 15 MHz

被引:2
|
作者
Xing, Guangzhen [1 ]
Yang, Ping [1 ]
He, Longbiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Metrol, Beijing 100013, Peoples R China
关键词
Hydrophone calibration; Heterodyne interferometer; Two-transducer reciprocity; Arctangent demodulation; OPTICAL INTERFEROMETRY; FIELD;
D O I
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.239-240.10
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper presents a comparison of high-frequency hydrophone calibration by a heterodyne interferometer and two-transducer reciprocity method respectively. For the calibration using the heterodyne interferometer, a vertical arrangement is applied to avoid the acousto-optical interaction which is a major uncertainty source in previous studies. For the demodulation of the acoustic displacement, a PC-based digital demodulation using arctangent algorithm is applied which has overcome the drawback of analog demodulation and achieved a higher demodulation accuracy. The demodulation is independent of the intensity of the carrier signal and thus can avoid the correction for the frequency response of the photodiode which is another uncertainty source. Comparison results between these two methods showed a good agreement. Owing to the optical measurement is independent of the acoustic field generating by the transducer, it has wider usage compared to the reciprocity method and can be easily extended to higher frequency and higher acoustic power application.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 15
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Primary calibration of hydrophones in the frequency range 10 to 500 kHz using a heterodyne interferometer
    Wang, Min
    Yang, Ping
    He, Longbiao
    Feng, Xiujuan
    Xing, Guangzhen
    [J]. Shengxue Xuebao/Acta Acustica, 2021, 46 (04): : 614 - 622
  • [2] Calibration of high-frequency hydrophone up to 40 MHz by heterodyne interferometer
    Yang, Ping
    Xing, Guangzhen
    He, Longbiao
    [J]. ULTRASONICS, 2014, 54 (01) : 402 - 407
  • [3] Interlaboratory Comparisons of Hydrophone Calibration in the 3–500 kHz Frequency Range
    A. Malarkodi
    G. Latha
    M. A. Atmanand
    A. E. Isaev
    A. N. Matveev
    N. G. Shcherbliuk
    F. Mann
    C. Jansen
    D. Milkert
    [J]. Measurement Techniques, 2016, 59 : 99 - 103
  • [4] Interlaboratory Comparisons of Hydrophone Calibration in the 3-500 kHz Frequency Range
    Malarkodi, A.
    Latha, G.
    Atmanand, M. A.
    Isaev, A. E.
    Matveev, A. N.
    Shcherbliuk, N. G.
    Mann, F.
    Jansen, C.
    Milkert, D.
    [J]. MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2016, 59 (01) : 99 - 103
  • [5] Calibration of Ultrasonic Hydrophone Probes in the Frequency Range from 250 kHz to 1 MHz
    Umchid, Sumet
    [J]. 2015 8TH BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE (BMEICON), 2015,
  • [6] Hydrophone Reciprocity Calibration in Spherically Focused Ultrasonic Field From 1 MHz to 15 MHz
    Xing, Guangzhen
    Yang, Ping
    Shou, Wende
    Wang, Min
    Feng, Xiujuan
    He, Longbiao
    [J]. ACTA ACUSTICA UNITED WITH ACUSTICA, 2019, 105 (02) : 273 - 283
  • [7] Technique for the calibration of hydrophones in the frequency range 10 to 600 kHz using a heterodyne interferometer and an acoustically compliant membrane
    Theobald, PD
    Robinson, SP
    Thompson, AD
    Preston, RC
    Lepper, PA
    Wang, YB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2005, 118 (05): : 3110 - 3116
  • [8] An international key comparison of free-field hydrophone calibrations in the frequency range 1 to 500 kHz
    Robinson, Stephen P.
    Harris, Peter M.
    Ablitt, Justin
    Hayman, Gary
    Thompson, Alex
    Van Buren, A. Lee
    Zalesak, Joseph F.
    Drake, Robert M.
    Isaev, Alexander E.
    Enyakov, Alexander M.
    Purcell, Christopher
    Houqing, Zhu
    Yuebing, Wang
    Yue, Zhang
    Botha, Pierre
    Krüger, Dieter
    [J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2006, 120 (03): : 1366 - 1373
  • [9] An international key comparison of free-field hydrophone calibrations in the frequency range 1 to 500 kHz
    Robinson, Stephen P.
    Harris, Peter M.
    Ablitt, Justin
    Hayman, Gary
    Thompson, Alex
    van Buren, A. Lee
    Zalesak, Joseph F.
    Drake, Robert M.
    Isaev, Alexander E.
    Enyakov, Alexander M.
    Purcell, Christopher
    Zhu Houqing
    Wang Yuebing
    Zhang Yue
    Botha, Pierre
    Krueger, Dieter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2006, 120 (03): : 1366 - 1373
  • [10] Two efficient methods for measuring hydrophone frequency response in the 100 kHz to 2 MHz range
    Harris, GR
    Maruvada, S
    Gammell, PM
    [J]. AMUM 2004: ADVANCED METROLOGY FOR ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2004, 2004, 1 : 26 - 31