Patient preference in the choice of dry powder inhalers

被引:18
|
作者
Giner, J [1 ]
Torrejón, A [1 ]
Ramos, A [1 ]
Casan, P [1 ]
Granel, C [1 ]
Plaza, V [1 ]
Belda, J [1 ]
Sanchis, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Dept Pneumol, Fac Med, Barcelona 08025, Spain
来源
ARCHIVOS DE BRONCONEUMOLOGIA | 2004年 / 40卷 / 03期
关键词
asthma; dry powder inhalers; preferences;
D O I
10.1016/S1579-2129(06)70074-X
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To investigate a group of patients' preferences among 3 dry powder inhalers-Accuhaler(R), Easyhaler(R), and Turbuhaler(R)-and to analyze the features that were most important for motivating choices. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study enrolled 30 patients with stable asthma with a mean (SD) age of 40 (13) and who habitually used inhaled corticosteroids. The patients were shown in detail how to use each of the devices and were randomized to begin using them in different orders. After using each inhaler for a week, the patients assessed 9 different features on a scale of 0 to 10 with an independent observer. The patients were asked to put the inhalers in order of preference, and finally to demonstrate they could use them correctly. RESULTS: All patients correctly performed the inhalation maneuver at the beginning and the end of the study. The mean final scores out of 90 of the 9 features evaluated were 75 (13) for the Easyhaler(R), 67 (12) for the Accuhaler(R), and 65 (14) for the Turbuhaler(R). Differences were statistically significant between the first and the second device (P=0.02) and the first and the third (P=.001) but not between the Accubaler(R) and the Turbuhaler(R) (P=376). Mean rating scores were 8.6 (1.4) for the Easyhaler(R), 73 (1.9) for the Turbuhaler(R), and 7.1 (1.6) for the Accuhaler(R). The Easyhaler(R) was the first choice for 53% of patients, the Turbuhaler(R) for 27 %, and the Accuhaler(R) for 20 %. CONCLUSIONS: The Easyhaler(R) was rated the highest by the patients in the study. The scores were a long way from the maximum score, so research into developing an ideal inhaler must continue.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 109
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of dry powder inhalers with a focus on ease of use and user preference in inhaler-naive individuals
    von Schantz, Sofia
    Katajavuori, Nina
    Antikainen, Osmo
    Juppo, Anne
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2016, 509 (1-2) : 50 - 58
  • [42] Is the Patient's Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate Important in the Prescription of Dry Powder Inhalers?
    O'Toole, P.
    Martin, R.
    Bernathpriya, Magimairaj
    McDonnell, T. J.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 187 : S284 - S284
  • [43] Discrete Modelling of Powder Dispersion in Dry Powder Inhalers - A Brief Review
    Tong, Zhenbo
    Yu, Aibing
    Chan, Hak-Kim
    Yang, Runyu
    CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2015, 21 (27) : 3966 - 3973
  • [44] INVESTIGATING POWDER FLUIDISATION AND PARTICLE ENTRAINMENT FROM DRY POWDER INHALERS
    Vernall, C.
    Tibbatts, J.
    Stephens, T.
    Murphy, S. D.
    Price, R.
    Shur, J.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2013, 26 (04) : A256 - A256
  • [45] Drug delivery to the lungs from dry powder inhalers
    Newman, SP
    CURRENT OPINION IN PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2003, 9 : S17 - S20
  • [46] Inhaler technique and patient's preference for dry powder inhaler devices
    Lavorini, Federico
    Fontana, Giovanni A.
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY, 2014, 11 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [47] Pressure and inspiratory flow characteristics of dry powder inhalers
    Cegla, UH
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2004, 98 : S22 - S28
  • [48] Predicting extrathoracic deposition from dry powder inhalers
    DeHaan, WH
    Finlay, WH
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 2004, 35 (03) : 309 - 331
  • [49] Foreword: Can dry powder inhalers be used interchangeably?
    Price, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2005, 59 : 1 - 1
  • [50] Preference for Easyhaler® Over Previous Dry Powder Inhalers in Asthma Patients: Results of the DPI PREFER Observational Study
    Javier Alvarez-Gutierrez, Francisco
    Gomez-Bastero Fernandez, Ana
    Medina Gallardo, Juan Francisco
    Campo Sien, Carlos
    Rytila, Paula
    Delgado Romero, Julio
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2021, 15 : 349 - 358