Patient preference in the choice of dry powder inhalers

被引:18
|
作者
Giner, J [1 ]
Torrejón, A [1 ]
Ramos, A [1 ]
Casan, P [1 ]
Granel, C [1 ]
Plaza, V [1 ]
Belda, J [1 ]
Sanchis, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Dept Pneumol, Fac Med, Barcelona 08025, Spain
来源
ARCHIVOS DE BRONCONEUMOLOGIA | 2004年 / 40卷 / 03期
关键词
asthma; dry powder inhalers; preferences;
D O I
10.1016/S1579-2129(06)70074-X
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To investigate a group of patients' preferences among 3 dry powder inhalers-Accuhaler(R), Easyhaler(R), and Turbuhaler(R)-and to analyze the features that were most important for motivating choices. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study enrolled 30 patients with stable asthma with a mean (SD) age of 40 (13) and who habitually used inhaled corticosteroids. The patients were shown in detail how to use each of the devices and were randomized to begin using them in different orders. After using each inhaler for a week, the patients assessed 9 different features on a scale of 0 to 10 with an independent observer. The patients were asked to put the inhalers in order of preference, and finally to demonstrate they could use them correctly. RESULTS: All patients correctly performed the inhalation maneuver at the beginning and the end of the study. The mean final scores out of 90 of the 9 features evaluated were 75 (13) for the Easyhaler(R), 67 (12) for the Accuhaler(R), and 65 (14) for the Turbuhaler(R). Differences were statistically significant between the first and the second device (P=0.02) and the first and the third (P=.001) but not between the Accubaler(R) and the Turbuhaler(R) (P=376). Mean rating scores were 8.6 (1.4) for the Easyhaler(R), 73 (1.9) for the Turbuhaler(R), and 7.1 (1.6) for the Accuhaler(R). The Easyhaler(R) was the first choice for 53% of patients, the Turbuhaler(R) for 27 %, and the Accuhaler(R) for 20 %. CONCLUSIONS: The Easyhaler(R) was rated the highest by the patients in the study. The scores were a long way from the maximum score, so research into developing an ideal inhaler must continue.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 109
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dry powder inhalers for optimal drug delivery
    Newman, SP
    EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY, 2004, 4 (01) : 23 - 33
  • [32] Applicability of dry powder inhalers in children with CF
    Lexmond, Anne
    Hagedoorn, Paul
    Frijlink, Erik
    Rottier, Bart
    De Boer, Anne
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2016, 48
  • [33] Effect of inflow conditioning for dry powder inhalers
    Singh, Gajendra
    Lowe, Albyn
    Azeem, Athiya
    Cheng, Shaokoon
    Chan, Hak-Kim
    Walenga, Ross
    Kourmatzis, Agisilaos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2021, 608
  • [34] Understanding the Importance of Capsules in Dry Powder Inhalers
    Buttini, Francesca
    Quarta, Eride
    Allegrini, Chiara
    Lavorini, Federico
    PHARMACEUTICS, 2021, 13 (11)
  • [35] ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR TESTING DRY POWDER INHALERS
    Daniels, Geoff
    Rice, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2013, 26 (04) : A246 - A247
  • [36] A method for the aerodynamic design of dry powder inhalers
    Ertunc, Oe
    Koeksoy, C.
    Wachtel, H.
    Delgado, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2011, 416 (01) : 25 - 34
  • [37] IN-VITRO TESTING OF DRY POWDER INHALERS
    VANOORT, M
    AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 22 (04) : 364 - 373
  • [38] Satisfaction, preference and error occurrence of three dry powder inhalers as assessed by a cohort naive to inhaler operation
    Man, Kwun Nok Mimi
    Tian, Zhipeng
    Lam, David Chi-Leung
    Wan, Jennifer Man Fan
    Tan-Un, Kian Cheng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2018, 13 : 1949 - 1963
  • [39] Design of dry powder inhalers to improve patient outcomes: it's not just about the device
    Weers, Jeffry G.
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY, 2024, 21 (03) : 365 - 380
  • [40] A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the ELLIPTA and HandiHaler Dry Powder Inhalers in Patients With COPD: Inhaler-Specific Attributes and Overall Patient Preference
    Collison, Kathryn A.
    Patel, Pinal
    Preece, Andrew F.
    Stanford, Richard H.
    Sharma, Raj K.
    Feldman, Gregory
    COPD-JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2018, 15 (01) : 46 - 50