Preference for Easyhaler® Over Previous Dry Powder Inhalers in Asthma Patients: Results of the DPI PREFER Observational Study

被引:3
|
作者
Javier Alvarez-Gutierrez, Francisco [1 ]
Gomez-Bastero Fernandez, Ana [2 ]
Medina Gallardo, Juan Francisco [1 ]
Campo Sien, Carlos [3 ]
Rytila, Paula [4 ]
Delgado Romero, Julio [5 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Virgen del Rocio, Unidad Asma, Av Manuel Siurot S-N, Seville 41013, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ Virgen Macarena, Unidad Asma, Seville, Spain
[3] Orion Pharma Iberia, Madrid, Spain
[4] Orion Pharma Corp, Espoo, Finland
[5] Hosp Virgen Macarena, Unidad Gest Clin Alergol, Seville, Spain
来源
关键词
patient satisfaction; adherence; inhaler devices; dry powder inhalers; asthma control; clinical outcomes; ADHERENCE; SATISFACTION; COPD;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S295710
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To study patient preference for and satisfaction with the Easyhaler (R) device and to assess ease of training and use of the inhaler in patients previously treated with a variety of dry powder inhalers (DPIs). Methods: We designed a non-interventional, cross-sectional, single-visit observational study of adult patients with persistent asthma referred to specialized care who had previously been treated with DPI inhalers for at least 3 months. Once clinical baseline data had been checked, patients filled in questionnaires on asthma control (GINA 2019), Feeling of Satisfaction with the Inhaler (FSI-10), and adherence (TAI and Morisky-Green questionnaires). Thereafter, all patients were trained in the use of Easyhaler. We assessed ease of use and satisfaction (FSI-10) with Easyhaler, as well as inhaler device preferences. Results: We recruited 502 patients (mean age, 50.2 +/- 16.2 y; 63.1% female), of whom 485 were evaluable. In response to the main objective of the study, we compared the values of the self-completed adapted FSI-10, to measure satisfaction with the inhaler. A significantly higher score in each item of the questionnaire was recorded for Easyhaler. Overall, 38% of patients showed exclusive preference for Easyhaler (compared with 15% for the previous device) or were evenly matched in 46% of cases. Conclusion: In the present study, Easyhaler achieved better patient ratings in terms of preference and satisfaction than previously used DPI devices. In order to improve asthma adherence strategies, patient preferences and device choice should be taken into account.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 358
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Late Breaking Abstract - Dry Powder Inhaler Preference in asthma patients. Results of the DPI PREFER Study
    Ramos Apolaya, Diana Lucila
    Romero Falcon, Maria A.
    Medina Gallardo, Juan F.
    Gomez-Bastero Fernandez, Ana
    Alvarez Gutierrez, Francisco
    Delgado Romero, Julio
    Campos Sien, Carlos
    Rytila, Paula
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2020, 56
  • [2] A Preference Study of Two Placebo Dry Powder Inhalers in Adults with COPD: ELLIPTA® Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI) versus DISKUS® DPI
    Kirby, Suyong Yun
    Zhu, Chang-Qing
    Kerwin, Edward M.
    Stanford, Richard H.
    Georges, George
    COPD-JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2016, 13 (02) : 167 - 175
  • [3] Do patients prefer dry powder inhalers or metered-dose inhalers? A retrospective, combined analysis
    Morice, AH
    Adler, LM
    Ellis, S
    Hewitt, A
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2002, 63 (08): : 496 - 506
  • [4] Preference, satisfaction and errors with two dry powder inhalers in patients with COPD
    van der Palen, Job
    Ginko, Thomas
    Kroker, Axel
    van der Valk, Paul
    Goosens, Martijn
    Padulles, Laura
    Seoane, Beatriz
    Rekeda, Ludmyla
    Garcia Gil, Esther
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY, 2013, 10 (08) : 1023 - 1031
  • [5] A randomized, cross-over study comparing critical and overall errors, learning time, and preference of the ELLIPTA versus BREEZHALER dry powder inhalers in patients with asthma
    van der Palen, Job
    Slade, David
    Rehal, Sunita
    Verma, Manish
    Plank, Maximilian
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2022, 205
  • [6] Inhalation characteristics with Spiromax® (S) versus Turbuhaler® (T) dry powder inhalers (DPI) in healthy adults (HA) and in patients with asthma (A) or COPD
    Azouz, Wahida
    Chetcuti, Philip
    Hosker, Harold
    Saralaya, Dinesh
    Chrystyn, Henry
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2013, 42
  • [7] Dry-powder inhalers in patients with persistent airflow limitation: usability and preference
    Dal Negro, Roberto W.
    Povero, Massimiliano
    MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 11
  • [8] A randomised cross-over trial investigating the ease of use and preference of two dry powder inhalers in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    van der Palen, Job
    van der Valk, Paul
    Goosens, Martijn
    Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Karin
    Brusse-Keizer, Marjolein
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY, 2013, 10 (09) : 1171 - 1178
  • [9] Superiority of Nebulized Corticosteroids over Dry Powder Inhalers in Certain Patients with Cough Variant Asthma or Cough-Predominant Asthma
    Kamimura, Mitsuhiro
    Izumi, Shinyu
    Hamamoto, Yoichiro
    Morita, Akane
    Toyota, Emiko
    Kobayashi, Nobuyuki
    Kudo, Koichiro
    ALLERGOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 61 (03) : 411 - 417
  • [10] Effect of incorrect use of dry powder inhalers on management of patients with asthma and COPD
    Lavorini, Federico
    Magnan, Antoine
    Dubus, Jean Christophe
    Voshaar, Thomas
    Corbetta, Lorenzo
    Broeders, Marielle
    Dekhuijzen, Richard
    Sanchis, Joaquin
    Viejo, Jose L.
    Barnes, Peter
    Corrigan, Chris
    Levy, Mark
    Crompton, Graham K.
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2008, 102 (04) : 593 - 604