ADAPTATION OF FOREIGN VISITING FACULTY TO LOCAL STUDENT LEARNING STYLES AND EXPECTATIONS

被引:0
|
作者
Reardon, James [1 ]
Auruskeviciene, Vilte [1 ]
Skudiene, Vida [1 ]
机构
[1] UNC, Monfort Coll Business, Greeley, CO USA
关键词
Teaching in Foreign Environments; Adaptation; Student Learning Preferences; Cross-Cultural Empirical; PARADIGM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Two trends in marketing higher education include: (1) growing opportunities for intercultural encounters in the classroom, and (2) more mobility of faculty teaching in foreign environments. One of the most difficult issues for a foreign visiting faculty member is overcoming years of experience with homes students and self reference criterion. While it is arguable that foreign faculty should adapt, typically students have expectations about expectations and content delivery in class. While foreign professors sometimes get the 'benefit of the doubt' (i.e., students have a wider latitude of acceptance for deviations from the local norms), severe deviations are likely to be met with resistance. This study surveys business college students from more than twenty-five different countries regarding their expectations/preferences for 1) Objective vs. Subjective information; 2) degree of ambiguity tolerance; 3) rewards for creative thinking; 4) importance of communication; and 5) preferences for teamwork over individual evaluation. The results suggest major differences in preferences for the five components. Specifically, the findings suggest that 1) high context cultures a) prefer more creative, less objective content, b) believe that the ability to communicate is important is independent of content and c) prefer teamwork as a major learning opportunity. Further, both high uncertainty and collectivist cultures tend to prefer a) to be evaluated on objective rather than subjective content; b) are less tolerant of ambiguity; c) prefer rewards for creativity; d) very strongly believe that communication is important as an independent criteria, and e) are strongly inclined to toward teamwork. Implications for foreign visiting/exchange professors are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:7100 / 7105
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Student learning styles, satisfaction and performance
    Freeman, JL
    Hanson, RC
    Rison, F
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SEVENTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN DECISION SCIENCES INSTITUTE, 1998, : 347 - 349
  • [22] Styles, approaches, and patterns in student learning
    Evans, Carol
    Vermunt, Jan D.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 83 (02) : 185 - 195
  • [23] Modeling Student Learning Styles in MOOCs
    Shi, Yuling
    Peng, Zhiyong
    Wang, Hongning
    [J]. CIKM'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 ACM CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2017, : 979 - 988
  • [24] Learning styles in foreign language instruction
    Simonova, Ivana
    [J]. 2011 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERACTIVE COLLABORATIVE LEARNING (ICL), 2011, : 595 - 601
  • [25] STUDENT SKILLS AND SELF LEARNING STYLES
    Martin-Cuadrado, Ana Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEARNING STYLES, 2011, 4 (08): : 136 - 148
  • [26] High Expectations, Strong Support: Faculty Behaviors Predicting Latina/o Community College Student Learning
    Lundberg, Carol A.
    Kim, Young K.
    Andrade, Luis M.
    Bahner, Daniel T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COLLEGE STUDENT DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 59 (01) : 55 - 70
  • [27] Learning Goals: Expectations of Residents Versus Faculty
    Bakaeen, Faisal G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 174 (01) : 88 - 89
  • [28] Faculty Expectations for Student Success in Community College Developmental Math
    Ellerbe, LaVerne W.
    [J]. COMMUNITY COLLEGE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2015, 39 (04) : 392 - 396
  • [29] Faculty and Student Technology Use to Enhance Student Learning
    Gaddis, Margaret L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN OPEN AND DISTRIBUTED LEARNING, 2020, 21 (04): : 39 - 60
  • [30] Do Student Learning Styles Translate to Different "Testing Styles''?
    Leithner, Anika
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2011, 7 (04) : 416 - 433