Comparison of conventional screen-film mammography and a direct digital magnification system: Detection of simulated small masses and calcifications with usual and reduced dose

被引：0
|
作者：
Hermann, K
Funke, M
Grabbe, EH
机构：
来源：
RADIOLOGY | 1999年 / 213P卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要：
1165
引用
收藏
页码：368 / 368
页数：1
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [31] Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography.
    Hermann, KP
    Obenauer, S
    Grabbe, E
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2000, 172 (11): : 940 - 945
  • [32] Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: Comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms
    Wei, Jun
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    Ge, Jun
    Roubidoux, Marilyn A.
    Helvie, Mark A.
    Zhou, Chuan
    Wu, Yi-Ta
    Paramagul, Chintana
    Zhang, Yiheng
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (06) : 659 - 669
  • [33] Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a computed radiography system by comparison of digital hard copy images with screen-film mammography: results of a prospective clinical trial
    Van Ongeval, C
    Bosmans, H
    Van Steen, A
    Joossens, K
    Celis, V
    Van Goethem, M
    Verslegers, I
    Nijs, K
    Rogge, F
    Marchal, G
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (06) : 1360 - 1366
  • [34] Flat-panel digital mammography system: Contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images
    Suryanarayanan, S
    Karellas, A
    Vedantham, S
    Ved, H
    Baker, SP
    D'Orsi, CJ
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (03) : 801 - 807
  • [35] Comparison of the detectability of small details in a film-screen and a digital mammography system by the imaging of a new CDMAM-phantom
    Thijssen, M
    Veldkamp, W
    Van Engen, R
    Swinkels, M
    Karssemeijer, N
    Hendriks, J
    IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 666 - 672
  • [36] Comparison of a flat-panel digital system with a conventional screen-film system: Anatomical visibility and image quality in chest radiographs of 70 oncology patients
    Fink, C
    Hansmann, J
    Hallscheidt, PJ
    Noeldge, G
    Kampschulte, A
    Kauffmann, GW
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 547 - 547
  • [37] Performance of a new digital flat panel detector in the detection of artificial bone lesions: A comparison with conventional screen-film radiography and phosphor-storage radiography
    Ludwig, K
    Lenzen, H
    Kamm, K
    Link, TM
    Diederich, S
    Wormanns, D
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 517 - 517
  • [38] Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms
    Ge, Jun
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Wei, Jun
    Helvie, Mark A.
    Zhou, Chuan
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (04): : 981 - 1000
  • [39] Comparison of a digital flat-panel versus screen-film, photofluorography and storage-phosphor systems by detection of simulated lung adenocarcinorna lesions using hard copy images
    Ono, K
    Yoshitake, T
    Akahane, K
    Yamada, Y
    Maeda, T
    Kai, M
    Kusama, T
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 78 (934): : 922 - 927
  • [40] Digital Compared with Screen-Film Mammography: Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy among Women Screened in the Ontario Breast Screening Program-Evidence that Direct Radiography Is Superior to Computed Radiography for Cancer Detection
    Pisano, Etta D.
    RADIOLOGY, 2016, 278 (02) : 311 - 312
12345