A new concept of pencil beam dose calculation for 40-200 keV photons using analytical dose kernels

被引:20
|
作者
Bartzsch, Stefan [1 ,2 ]
Oelfke, Uwe [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Deutsch Krebsforschungszentrum, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Inst Canc Res, Sutton SM2 5NG, Surrey, England
关键词
dose calculation; point dose kernels; microbeam radiation therapy; MONTE-CARLO SIMULATIONS; MICROBEAM RADIATION-THERAPY; X-RAYS; DISTRIBUTIONS; TRANSPORT; DENSITY; ARRAYS; TISSUE;
D O I
10.1118/1.4824150
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The advent of widespread kV-cone beam computer tomography in image guided radiation therapy and special therapeutic application of keV photons, e.g., in microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) require accurate and fast dose calculations for photon beams with energies between 40 and 200 keV. Multiple photon scattering originating from Compton scattering and the strong dependence of the photoelectric cross section on the atomic number of the interacting tissue render these dose calculations by far more challenging than the ones established for corresponding MeV beams. That is why so far developed analytical models of kV photon dose calculations fail to provide the required accuracy and one has to rely on time consuming Monte Carlo simulation techniques. Methods: In this paper, the authors introduce a novel analytical approach for kV photon dose calculations with an accuracy that is almost comparable to the one of Monte Carlo simulations. First, analytical point dose and pencil beam kernels are derived for homogeneous media and compared to Monte Carlo simulations performed with the Geant4 toolkit. The dose contributions are systematically separated into contributions from the relevant orders of multiple photon scattering. Moreover, approximate scaling laws for the extension of the algorithm to inhomogeneous media are derived. Results: The comparison of the analytically derived dose kernels in water showed an excellent agreement with the Monte Carlo method. Calculated values deviate less than 5% from Monte Carlo derived dose values, for doses above 1% of the maximum dose. The analytical structure of the kernels allows adaption to arbitrary materials and photon spectra in the given energy range of 40-200 keV. Conclusions: The presented analytical methods can be employed in a fast treatment planning system for MRT. In convolution based algorithms dose calculation times can be reduced to a few minutes. (C) 2013 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [21] A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm
    Ding, GX
    Cygler, JE
    Yu, CW
    Kalach, NI
    Daskalov, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (02): : 622 - 633
  • [22] Quantitative Assessment of Dose Differences Between CT and Cone-Beam CT Using Pencil Beam Convolution and Analytical Anisotropic Algorithms
    Ali, I.
    Oyewale, S.
    Ahmad, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [23] Monte Carlo Versus Pencil Beam Dose Calculation for Spine SBRT Treatments Using HybridARC and Sliding Windows IMRT
    Venencia, C.
    Pino, M.
    Caussa, L.
    Molineu, A.
    Garrigo, E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3549 - +
  • [24] Proton dose calculation using Monte-Carlo-validated pencil beam database for KonRad treatment planning system
    Trofimov, A
    Knopf, A
    Jiang, H
    Bortfeld, T
    Paganetti, H
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 2030 - 2030
  • [25] Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance
    Ali, Imad
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (03) : 255 - 261
  • [26] Dosimetric Effect of Implanted Hardware in Spine SBRT: Comparison of the Actual Planned Dose Using Pencil Beam Calculation to Monte Carlo
    Djemil, T.
    Ouzidane, M.
    Unal, S.
    Reddy, C. A.
    Angelov, L.
    Suh, J. H.
    Chao, S. T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S826 - S826
  • [27] Interactive 4D Proton Pencil Beam Dose Calculation Using Shadie: A Fast GPU-Based Visualization Language
    Wolfgang, J.
    Hasan, M.
    Pfister, H.
    Chen, G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [28] Independent planar dose calculation for IMRT segments using a pencil beam extraction technique from measured square field output factors
    Ayyangar, K
    Nehru, R
    Celi, J
    Enke, C
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (06) : 1896 - 1896
  • [29] Evaluation of Lateral Penumbra for Proton Pencil Beam Scanning with and Without Brass Apertures Using a Commercial Monte Carlo Dose Calculation Algorithm
    Maes, D.
    Regmi, R.
    Egan, A.
    Nevitt, Z.
    Leuro, E.
    Wong, T.
    Bowen, S.
    Saini, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E270 - E270
  • [30] PENCIL BEAM (PB), COLLAPSED CONE (CC) AND MONTE CARLO (MC) DOSE CALCULATION: DIFFERENCES IN DOSE DISTRIBUTION IN THE TREATMENT OF MEDIASTINAL HODGKIN LYMPHOMA (HL) AS A CONSEQUENCE OF USING DIFFERENT ALGORITHMS
    Abo-Madyan, Y.
    Koeck, J.
    Stieler, F.
    Olms-Hofmann, S.
    Wenz, F.
    Lohr, F.
    Eich, H.
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2010, 95 : S46 - S46