Towards social life cycle assessment of mobility services: systematic literature review and the way forward

被引:30
|
作者
Gompf, Katharina [1 ,2 ]
Traverso, Marzia [2 ]
Hetterich, Joerg [1 ]
机构
[1] BMW Grp, Knorrstr 147, D-80788 Munich, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Sustainabil Civil Engn, Aachen, Germany
来源
关键词
Mobility services; Social life cycle assessment; S-LCA; Use phase; Social sustainability indicators; Systematic literature review; URBAN SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK; INDICATOR SYSTEM; CITY INDEX; LAND-USE; TRANSPORT; MODEL; CITIES; PERFORMANCE; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-020-01788-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose The main purpose of this review is to describe the state of the art of social impact assessment with a focus on mobility services. Whereas the use phase plays an important role for the assessment of services in general, the evaluation of the use phase has been underrepresented in previous social life cycle assessment studies. For that reason, particular attention has been paid to indicators, which allow the assessment of social impacts during the use phase of mobility services. Methods Continuous efforts to mitigate climate change and to improve quality of life in cities result in new mobility solutions based on collective use. This will have a huge impact on our society transforming the use of vehicles. In order to better understand the implications for cities, society and the automotive industry, it is essential to evaluate the social impact generated along a product life cycle with particular attention to the use phase. To reach the goal, a systematic literature review was carried out with a focus on social indicators that allow assessing use phase impacts of mobility services. The indicators were analysed and allocated to stakeholder groups. Based on the analysis, a core set of indicators is proposed under consideration of data availability. Results and discussion Based on the selected search strings, 51 publications were selected for the literature review, including 579 social indicators. The analysis revealed a wide variety and diversity of indicators that are trying to measure the same aspect. The allocation to the respective stakeholder groups showed that most of the indicators (36%) evaluate impacts regarding the stakeholder group local community. The majority of analysed indicators are of quantitative nature (63%). Nevertheless, a clear assessment method was often missing in the respective publications. Therefore, for the core set of indicators, an assessment method is proposed for every indicator. Conclusions The results from this study can help practitioners as well as researchers in the field of urban mobility assessment as it systematically analyses social sustainability aspects. The presented data gives an overview of various indicators that are suggested in other publications, and the proposed core set of indicators can be used to evaluate different mobility services in further research.
引用
收藏
页码:1883 / 1909
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Social Impact Assessment: A Systematic Review of Literature
    Alomoto, William
    Ninerola, Angels
    Pie, Laia
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2022, 161 (01) : 225 - 250
  • [42] Social Impact Assessment: A Systematic Review of Literature
    William Alomoto
    Angels Niñerola
    Laia Pié
    Social Indicators Research, 2022, 161 : 225 - 250
  • [43] Ecosystem services and life cycle assessment: A bibliometric review
    VanderWilde, Calli P.
    Newell, Joshua P.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 169
  • [44] Life Cycle Assessment for Servitization: A Case Study on Current Mobility Services
    Fernando, Chalaka
    Soo, Vi Kie
    Doolan, Matthew
    SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING - HAND IN HAND TO SUSTAINABILITY ON GLOBE, 2020, 43 : 72 - 79
  • [45] Quality assessment of African herbal medicine: A systematic review and the way forward
    Orman, Emmanuel
    Bekoe, Samuel Oppong
    Jato, Jonathan
    Spiegler, Verena
    Asare-Nkansah, Samuel
    Agyare, Christian
    Hensel, Andreas
    Bekoe, Emelia Oppong
    FITOTERAPIA, 2022, 162
  • [46] Exploring the role of social life cycle assessment in transition to circular economy: A systematic review
    Bhatnagar, Anubhuti
    Harri, Anna
    Levanen, Jarkko
    Niinimaki, Kirsi
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2024, 207
  • [47] Residential Mobility and Social Behaviors of Adolescents: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Cotton, Brandi Parker
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRIC NURSING, 2016, 29 (04) : 177 - 187
  • [48] Social capital and economic mobility in tourism: a systematic literature review
    Aminudin, Norliza
    Jamal, Salamiah A.
    COGENT SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2024, 10 (01):
  • [49] Life cycle assessment of green buildings: a literature review
    Qian, S.
    Hamdany, A. H.
    LIFE-CYCLE OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS: DESIGN, ASSESSMENT, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, : 1725 - 1732
  • [50] Permeable Pavements Life Cycle Assessment: A Literature Review
    Antunes, Lucas Niehuns
    Ghisi, Enedir
    Thives, Liseane Padilha
    WATER, 2018, 10 (11)