Towards social life cycle assessment of mobility services: systematic literature review and the way forward

被引:30
|
作者
Gompf, Katharina [1 ,2 ]
Traverso, Marzia [2 ]
Hetterich, Joerg [1 ]
机构
[1] BMW Grp, Knorrstr 147, D-80788 Munich, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Sustainabil Civil Engn, Aachen, Germany
来源
关键词
Mobility services; Social life cycle assessment; S-LCA; Use phase; Social sustainability indicators; Systematic literature review; URBAN SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK; INDICATOR SYSTEM; CITY INDEX; LAND-USE; TRANSPORT; MODEL; CITIES; PERFORMANCE; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-020-01788-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose The main purpose of this review is to describe the state of the art of social impact assessment with a focus on mobility services. Whereas the use phase plays an important role for the assessment of services in general, the evaluation of the use phase has been underrepresented in previous social life cycle assessment studies. For that reason, particular attention has been paid to indicators, which allow the assessment of social impacts during the use phase of mobility services. Methods Continuous efforts to mitigate climate change and to improve quality of life in cities result in new mobility solutions based on collective use. This will have a huge impact on our society transforming the use of vehicles. In order to better understand the implications for cities, society and the automotive industry, it is essential to evaluate the social impact generated along a product life cycle with particular attention to the use phase. To reach the goal, a systematic literature review was carried out with a focus on social indicators that allow assessing use phase impacts of mobility services. The indicators were analysed and allocated to stakeholder groups. Based on the analysis, a core set of indicators is proposed under consideration of data availability. Results and discussion Based on the selected search strings, 51 publications were selected for the literature review, including 579 social indicators. The analysis revealed a wide variety and diversity of indicators that are trying to measure the same aspect. The allocation to the respective stakeholder groups showed that most of the indicators (36%) evaluate impacts regarding the stakeholder group local community. The majority of analysed indicators are of quantitative nature (63%). Nevertheless, a clear assessment method was often missing in the respective publications. Therefore, for the core set of indicators, an assessment method is proposed for every indicator. Conclusions The results from this study can help practitioners as well as researchers in the field of urban mobility assessment as it systematically analyses social sustainability aspects. The presented data gives an overview of various indicators that are suggested in other publications, and the proposed core set of indicators can be used to evaluate different mobility services in further research.
引用
收藏
页码:1883 / 1909
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life cycle sustainability assessment of alternative green roofs - A systematic literature review
    Balasbaneh, Ali Tighnavard
    Sher, Willy
    Madun, Aziman
    Ashour, Ashraf
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 248
  • [22] Application of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment in the automotive sector – A systematic literature review
    Ostojic, Suzana
    Traverso, Marzia
    Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2024, 47 : 105 - 127
  • [23] Social Life Cycle Assessment in the Construction Industry: Systematic Literature Review and Identification of Relevant Social Indicators for Carbon Reinforced Concrete
    Backes, Jana Gerta
    Traverso, Marzia
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (03) : 7199 - 7233
  • [24] Social Life Cycle Assessment in the Construction Industry: Systematic Literature Review and Identification of Relevant Social Indicators for Carbon Reinforced Concrete
    Jana Gerta Backes
    Marzia Traverso
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2024, 26 : 7199 - 7233
  • [25] Systematic Literature Review on Dynamic Life Cycle Inventory: Towards Industry 4.0 Applications
    Cornago, Simone
    Tan, Yee Shee
    Brondi, Carlo
    Ramakrishna, Seeram
    Low, Jonathan Sze Choong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (11)
  • [26] Life cycle assessment of electric scooters for mobility services: A green mobility solutions
    Ishaq, Muhammad
    Ishaq, Haris
    Nawaz, Afzaal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 46 (14) : 20339 - 20356
  • [27] A systematic review of consequential life cycle assessment in whole building life cycle assessment
    Udisi, B.
    Gorgolewski, M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 7 (02):
  • [28] Life cycle assessment of campuses: A systematic review
    Qiu, Yu
    Dong, Yahong
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2024, 319
  • [29] The Use of Social Media Tools in the Product Life Cycle Phases: A Systematic Literature Review
    Roch, Jeremi
    Mosconi, Elaine
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 49TH ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS 2016), 2016, : 1830 - 1839
  • [30] A comprehensive analysis towards benchmarking of life cycle assessment of buildings based on systematic review
    Dong, Yahong
    Ng, S. Thomas
    Liu, Peng
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 204