Towards social life cycle assessment of mobility services: systematic literature review and the way forward

被引:30
|
作者
Gompf, Katharina [1 ,2 ]
Traverso, Marzia [2 ]
Hetterich, Joerg [1 ]
机构
[1] BMW Grp, Knorrstr 147, D-80788 Munich, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Sustainabil Civil Engn, Aachen, Germany
来源
关键词
Mobility services; Social life cycle assessment; S-LCA; Use phase; Social sustainability indicators; Systematic literature review; URBAN SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK; INDICATOR SYSTEM; CITY INDEX; LAND-USE; TRANSPORT; MODEL; CITIES; PERFORMANCE; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-020-01788-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose The main purpose of this review is to describe the state of the art of social impact assessment with a focus on mobility services. Whereas the use phase plays an important role for the assessment of services in general, the evaluation of the use phase has been underrepresented in previous social life cycle assessment studies. For that reason, particular attention has been paid to indicators, which allow the assessment of social impacts during the use phase of mobility services. Methods Continuous efforts to mitigate climate change and to improve quality of life in cities result in new mobility solutions based on collective use. This will have a huge impact on our society transforming the use of vehicles. In order to better understand the implications for cities, society and the automotive industry, it is essential to evaluate the social impact generated along a product life cycle with particular attention to the use phase. To reach the goal, a systematic literature review was carried out with a focus on social indicators that allow assessing use phase impacts of mobility services. The indicators were analysed and allocated to stakeholder groups. Based on the analysis, a core set of indicators is proposed under consideration of data availability. Results and discussion Based on the selected search strings, 51 publications were selected for the literature review, including 579 social indicators. The analysis revealed a wide variety and diversity of indicators that are trying to measure the same aspect. The allocation to the respective stakeholder groups showed that most of the indicators (36%) evaluate impacts regarding the stakeholder group local community. The majority of analysed indicators are of quantitative nature (63%). Nevertheless, a clear assessment method was often missing in the respective publications. Therefore, for the core set of indicators, an assessment method is proposed for every indicator. Conclusions The results from this study can help practitioners as well as researchers in the field of urban mobility assessment as it systematically analyses social sustainability aspects. The presented data gives an overview of various indicators that are suggested in other publications, and the proposed core set of indicators can be used to evaluate different mobility services in further research.
引用
收藏
页码:1883 / 1909
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Towards social life cycle assessment: a quantitative product social impact assessment
    Marzia Traverso
    Lynn Bell
    Peter Saling
    João Fontes
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 597 - 606
  • [32] Towards social life cycle assessment: a quantitative product social impact assessment
    Traverso, Marzia
    Bell, Lynn
    Saling, Peter
    Fontes, Joao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (03): : 597 - 606
  • [33] Life Cycle Assessment of Forest-Derived Solid Biofuels: a Systematic Review of the Literature
    Ricardo Musule
    Joel Bonales-Revuelta
    Tuyeni H. Mwampamba
    Rosa M. Gallardo-Alvarez
    Omar Masera
    Carlos A. García
    BioEnergy Research, 2022, 15 : 1711 - 1732
  • [34] Life cycle assessment in aviation: A systematic literature review of applications, methodological approaches and challenges
    Keiser, Dennis
    Schnoor, Lars Henrik
    Pupkes, Birte
    Freitag, Michael
    JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2023, 110
  • [35] Implementation of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in the Procurement Process of Buildings: A Systematic Literature Review
    Scherz, Marco
    Wieser, Antonija Ana
    Passer, Alexander
    Kreiner, Helmuth
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (24)
  • [36] Life Cycle Assessment Applied to Milk Production and Processing: An Integrative Systematic Literature Review
    Cruz-Rivero, Lidilia
    Hernandez, Erika Andrea
    Lince-Olguin, Ernesto
    Mar-Orozco, Carlos Eusebio
    Lopez-Garcia, Susana Astrid
    Cruz-Martinez, Perla Yetlanezi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (04)
  • [37] Life Cycle Assessment of Forest-Derived Solid Biofuels: a Systematic Review of the Literature
    Musule, Ricardo
    Bonales-Revuelta, Joel
    Mwampamba, Tuyeni H.
    Gallardo-Alvarez, Rosa M.
    Masera, Omar
    Garcia, Carlos A.
    BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 15 (04) : 1711 - 1732
  • [38] Applying social life cycle assessment to evaluate the use phase of mobility services: a case study in Berlin
    Katharina Gompf
    Marzia Traverso
    Jörg Hetterich
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2022, 27 : 603 - 622
  • [39] Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services
    Gompf, Katharina
    Traverso, Marzia
    Hetterich, Joerg
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (03) : 1 - 10
  • [40] Applying social life cycle assessment to evaluate the use phase of mobility services: a case study in Berlin
    Gompf, Katharina
    Traverso, Marzia
    Hetterich, Jorg
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2022, 27 (04): : 603 - 622