Geographic variation in volumetric breast density between screening regions in the Netherlands

被引:15
|
作者
van der Waal, Danille [1 ]
Emaus, Marleen J. [2 ]
Bakker, Marije F. [2 ]
den Heeten, Gerard J. [3 ,4 ]
Karssemeijer, Nico [5 ]
Pijnappel, Ruud M. [3 ,6 ]
Veldhuis, Wouter B. [6 ]
Verbeek, Andre L. M. [1 ]
van Gils, Carla H. [2 ]
Broeders, Mireille J. M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Evidence, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Dutch Reference Ctr Screening, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiol, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Digital mammography; Breast cancer screening; Mammographic density; Socio-economic status; Urbanisation; MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY; CANCER RISK; FILM MAMMOGRAPHY; ASSOCIATION; PERFORMANCE; MARKERS;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-015-3742-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Differences in breast density between populations may explain part of the variation in regional breast cancer screening performance. This study aimed to determine whether regional differences in breast density distribution are present in the Dutch screening population. As part of the DENSE trial, mammographic density was measured using a fully-automated volumetric method. The regions in our study were based on the geographic coverage of 14 reading units representing a large part of the Netherlands. General linear models were used. Four hundred eighty-five thousand and twenty-one screening participants with a median age of 60 years were included (2013-2014). The proportion of women with heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts ranged from 32.5 % to 45.7 % between regions. Mean percent dense volume varied between 6.51 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 6.46-6.55) and 7.68 % (95 % CI: 7.66-7.71). Age differences could not explain the variation. Socio-economic status (SES) was positively associated with volumetric density in all analyses (low SES: 6.95 % vs. high SES: 7.63 %; p (trend) < 0.0001), whereas a potential association between urbanisation and breast density only became apparent after SES adjustment. There appears to be geographic variation in mammographic density in the Netherlands, emphasizing the importance of including breast density as parameter in the evaluation of screening performance. aEuro cent Mammographic density may affect regional breast cancer screening performance. aEuro cent Volumetric breast density varies across screening areas. aEuro cent SES is positively associated with breast density. aEuro cent Implications of volumetric breast density differences need to be studied further.
引用
收藏
页码:3328 / 3337
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Geographic variation in volumetric breast density between screening regions in the Netherlands
    Daniëlle van der Waal
    Marleen J. Emaus
    Marije F. Bakker
    Gerard J. den Heeten
    Nico Karssemeijer
    Ruud M. Pijnappel
    Wouter B. Veldhuis
    André L. M. Verbeek
    Carla H van Gils
    Mireille J. M. Broeders
    [J]. European Radiology, 2015, 25 : 3328 - 3337
  • [2] Volumetric Breast Density and Breast Cancer Risk Factors in a Screening Population
    Diffey, Jennifer
    Morrison, Joanna
    Berks, Michael
    Greene, Joanne
    Morris, Julie
    Maxwell, Anthony
    Boggis, Caroline
    Hufton, Alan
    Astley, Susan
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2010, 6136 : 386 - +
  • [3] Effect of tissue thickness variation in volumetric breast density estimation
    Alonzo-Proulx, Olivier
    Tyson, Albert H.
    Mawdsley, Gordon E.
    Yaffe, Martin J.
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5116 : 659 - +
  • [4] Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography
    Wanders, Johanna O. P.
    Holland, Katharina
    Veldhuis, Wouter B.
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Pijnappel, Ruud M.
    Peeters, Petra H. M.
    van Gils, Carla H.
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 162 (01) : 95 - 103
  • [5] Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography
    Johanna O. P. Wanders
    Katharina Holland
    Wouter B. Veldhuis
    Ritse M. Mann
    Ruud M. Pijnappel
    Petra H. M. Peeters
    Carla H. van Gils
    Nico Karssemeijer
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2017, 162 : 95 - 103
  • [6] Relationship between volumetric breast density and socioeconomic status
    Samuels, L.
    Astley, S. M.
    Maxwell, A.
    Sergeant, J. C.
    Morris, J.
    Wilson, M.
    Stavrinos, P.
    Evans, D. G.
    Howell, A.
    Bydder, M.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 15
  • [7] Breast cancer risk factors and volumetric breast density in a national breast cancer screening program
    Hjerkind, Kirsti V.
    Ellingjord-Dale, Merete
    Johansson, Anna L.
    Aase, Hildegunn S.
    Hoff, Solveig R.
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Fagerheim, Siri
    Vos, Linda
    Silva, Isabel dos Santos
    Ursin, Giske
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 78 (13)
  • [8] Quantification of masking risk in screening mammography with volumetric breast density maps
    Holland, Katharina
    van Gils, Carla H.
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 162 (03) : 541 - 548
  • [9] Quantification of masking risk in screening mammography with volumetric breast density maps
    Katharina Holland
    Carla H. van Gils
    Ritse M. Mann
    Nico Karssemeijer
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2017, 162 : 541 - 548
  • [10] What drives variation in spending for breast cancer patients within geographic regions?
    Sinaiko, Anna D.
    Chien, Alyna T.
    Hassett, Michael J.
    Kakani, Pragya
    Rodin, Danielle
    Meyers, David J.
    Fraile, Belen
    Rosenthal, Meredith B.
    Landrum, Mary Beth
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 54 (01) : 97 - 105