Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography

被引:131
|
作者
Regnard, C [1 ]
Nosbusch, M [1 ]
Fellemans, C [1 ]
Benali, N [1 ]
Van Rysselberghe, M [1 ]
Barlow, P [1 ]
Rozenberg, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Brussels VUB ULB, CHU St Pierre, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Cesarean section; dehiscence; niche; saline contrast sonohysterography;
D O I
10.1002/uog.999
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate the frequency of images suggesting the existence of a dehiscence at the site of the uterine scar after Cesarean section. Methods Thirty-three women with a past history of Cesarean section who were planning a further pregnancy were involved in the study. Saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH) was performed a minimum of 3 months following Cesarean section. The thickness of the residual myometrium, the thickness of the myometrium bordering the scar and the depth of the filling defect in the scar (i.e. the 'niche', defined as a triangular, anechoic area at the presumed site of incision) were recorded in each case. A 'dehiscence' was defined as a niche whose depth was at least 80% of the anterior myometrium. Results In 19/33 (57.5%) patients a niche with a depth of 4.2 +/- 2.5 (range, 1.2-11.7) mm was identified. In these patients the residual myometrium measured 6.5 +/- 2.7 (range, 0-10.9) mm vs. 8.9 +/- 2.0 (range, 6.9-13.9) mm in the remaining 14 patients without a niche. Within the 19 niches, two dehiscences were identified. Conclusion Niches can be identified by SCSH following a Cesarean section in about 60% of patients. The prevalence of scar dehiscence (in the present series 2133 or 6%) is much higher than the reported risk of uterine rupture (0.4%). Copyright (C) 2004 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 292
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Endometriosis of an abdominal scar following cesarean section
    Williams, PH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1929, 17 : 102 - 104
  • [42] Multiple vegetating plaques on a Cesarean section scar
    Zaouak, Anissa
    Jouini, Raja
    Ben Brahim, Ehsen
    Hammami, Houda
    Fenniche, Samy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 58 (01) : 47 - 49
  • [43] Endometriosis in the uterine wall cesarean section scar
    Kafkasli, A
    Franklin, RR
    Sauls, D
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 1996, 42 (03) : 211 - 213
  • [44] DESMOID TUMOR IN A CESAREAN-SECTION SCAR
    SHARP, N
    DAW, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1984, 149 (01) : 83 - 83
  • [45] Diagnosis and Management of Cesarean Section Scar Pregnancy
    Dasari, Papa
    Subbaiah, Murali
    Sagili, Haritha
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2015, 31 (05) : 285 - 288
  • [46] Re-visit the cesarean section scar
    Chen, Shu-Fen
    Kao, Senyeong
    Wang, Peng-Hui
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 59 (05): : 633 - 634
  • [47] Implantation of a gestational sac in a cesarean section scar
    Shufaro, Y
    Nadjari, M
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2001, 75 (06) : 1217 - 1217
  • [48] Cesarean section scar diverticulum: Appearance on hysterosalpingography
    Surapaneni, Krishna
    Silberzweig, James E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (04) : 870 - 874
  • [49] UTERINE SCAR FOLLOWING CESAREAN-SECTION
    RIKOWER, M
    REVUE FRANCAISE DE GYNECOLOGIE ET D OBSTETRIQUE, 1972, 67 (2-3): : 182 - &
  • [50] Ectopic pregnancy within a Cesarean section scar
    Hassan, I.
    Lower, A.
    Overton, C.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 29 (04) : 475 - 476