Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography

被引:131
|
作者
Regnard, C [1 ]
Nosbusch, M [1 ]
Fellemans, C [1 ]
Benali, N [1 ]
Van Rysselberghe, M [1 ]
Barlow, P [1 ]
Rozenberg, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Brussels VUB ULB, CHU St Pierre, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Cesarean section; dehiscence; niche; saline contrast sonohysterography;
D O I
10.1002/uog.999
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate the frequency of images suggesting the existence of a dehiscence at the site of the uterine scar after Cesarean section. Methods Thirty-three women with a past history of Cesarean section who were planning a further pregnancy were involved in the study. Saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH) was performed a minimum of 3 months following Cesarean section. The thickness of the residual myometrium, the thickness of the myometrium bordering the scar and the depth of the filling defect in the scar (i.e. the 'niche', defined as a triangular, anechoic area at the presumed site of incision) were recorded in each case. A 'dehiscence' was defined as a niche whose depth was at least 80% of the anterior myometrium. Results In 19/33 (57.5%) patients a niche with a depth of 4.2 +/- 2.5 (range, 1.2-11.7) mm was identified. In these patients the residual myometrium measured 6.5 +/- 2.7 (range, 0-10.9) mm vs. 8.9 +/- 2.0 (range, 6.9-13.9) mm in the remaining 14 patients without a niche. Within the 19 niches, two dehiscences were identified. Conclusion Niches can be identified by SCSH following a Cesarean section in about 60% of patients. The prevalence of scar dehiscence (in the present series 2133 or 6%) is much higher than the reported risk of uterine rupture (0.4%). Copyright (C) 2004 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 292
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Histopathological evaluation of cesarean scar defect in women with cesarean scar syndrome
    Higuchi, Asuka
    Tsuji, Shunichiro
    Nobuta, Yuri
    Nakamura, Akiko
    Katsura, Daisuke
    Amano, Tsukuru
    Kimura, Fuminori
    Tanimura, Satoshi
    Murakami, Takashi
    REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [32] Pitfall in Ultrasound Evaluation of Uterine Scar from Prior Preterm Cesarean Section
    Laflamme, Sarah-Maude B.
    Jastrow, Nicole
    Girard, Mario
    Paris, Gaetan
    Berube, Laurie
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    AJP REPORTS, 2011, 1 (01): : 65 - 68
  • [33] Recurrence in Cesarean Section Scar Ectopic Pregnancies
    Kinsey, Ally
    JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY, 2024, 40 (03) : 285 - 287
  • [34] ENDOMETRIOSIS OF ABDOMINAL SCAR AFTER CESAREAN SECTION
    FIELD, CA
    SYMMONDS, RE
    BANNER, EA
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1962, 37 (01) : 12 - &
  • [35] SCAR FORMATION IN UTERUS AFTER CESAREAN SECTION
    WOJDECKI, J
    GRYNSZTA.A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1970, 107 (02) : 322 - &
  • [36] Ectopic Pregnancy Within a Cesarean Section Scar
    Rajan, Shamin
    JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY, 2006, 22 (06) : 395 - 398
  • [37] Late morbidity in cesarean section scar syndrome
    Klimankova, V
    Pilka, R.
    CESKA GYNEKOLOGIE-CZECH GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 83 (04): : 300 - 306
  • [38] Abdominal wall endometrioma in the cesarean section scar
    Olejek, Anita
    Zamlynski, Jacek
    Podwinska, Ewa
    Horak, Stanislaw
    Paliga-Zytniewska, Marta
    Kellas-Sleczka, Sylwia
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2008, 79 (09) : 612 - 615
  • [39] Rupture of the uterus through the cesarean section scar
    Novak, E
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1918, 71 : 105 - 106
  • [40] Ultrasound diagnosis of a pregnancy in a Cesarean section scar
    Seow, KM
    Hwang, JL
    Tsai, YL
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 18 (05) : 547 - 549