Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography

被引:131
|
作者
Regnard, C [1 ]
Nosbusch, M [1 ]
Fellemans, C [1 ]
Benali, N [1 ]
Van Rysselberghe, M [1 ]
Barlow, P [1 ]
Rozenberg, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Brussels VUB ULB, CHU St Pierre, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Cesarean section; dehiscence; niche; saline contrast sonohysterography;
D O I
10.1002/uog.999
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate the frequency of images suggesting the existence of a dehiscence at the site of the uterine scar after Cesarean section. Methods Thirty-three women with a past history of Cesarean section who were planning a further pregnancy were involved in the study. Saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH) was performed a minimum of 3 months following Cesarean section. The thickness of the residual myometrium, the thickness of the myometrium bordering the scar and the depth of the filling defect in the scar (i.e. the 'niche', defined as a triangular, anechoic area at the presumed site of incision) were recorded in each case. A 'dehiscence' was defined as a niche whose depth was at least 80% of the anterior myometrium. Results In 19/33 (57.5%) patients a niche with a depth of 4.2 +/- 2.5 (range, 1.2-11.7) mm was identified. In these patients the residual myometrium measured 6.5 +/- 2.7 (range, 0-10.9) mm vs. 8.9 +/- 2.0 (range, 6.9-13.9) mm in the remaining 14 patients without a niche. Within the 19 niches, two dehiscences were identified. Conclusion Niches can be identified by SCSH following a Cesarean section in about 60% of patients. The prevalence of scar dehiscence (in the present series 2133 or 6%) is much higher than the reported risk of uterine rupture (0.4%). Copyright (C) 2004 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 292
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endometriosis in a previous cesarean section scar
    Pardo, M. I.
    Campos, S.
    Ouvina, O.
    Carames, N.
    Vidal, R.
    Vazquez-Rodriguez, M.
    CLINICA E INVESTIGACION EN GINECOLOGIA Y OBSTETRICIA, 2010, 37 (01): : 35 - 37
  • [22] Cesarean Section Scar in Gynecological Ultrasound
    Brezinka C.
    Journal für Gynäkologische Endokrinologie/Österreich, 2021, 31 (2): : 73 - 76
  • [23] AN EVALUATION OF UTERINE SCAR INTEGRITY AFTER CESAREAN-SECTION IN RABBITS
    DUNNIHOO, DR
    OTTERSON, WN
    MAILHES, JB
    LEWIS, DF
    GRAFTON, WD
    BROWN, CC
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1989, 73 (03): : 390 - 394
  • [24] CESAREAN SECTION SCAR ECTOPIC PREGNANCY
    Mackesy, Meaghan Marie
    Chick, Jeffrey Forris Beecham
    Chauhan, Nikunj Rashmikant
    Mandell, Jacob C.
    Khurana, Bharti
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 46 (05): : 685 - 686
  • [25] Vaginal repair of cesarean section scar defects: Preoperative hysteroscopic evaluation
    Chen, Huihui
    Wang, Yizhi
    Zhang, Hui
    Wang, Xipeng
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2022, 101 (11) : 1308 - 1314
  • [26] A case of cesarean section scar endometriosis
    Ruf, R. R.
    Galkina, D. E.
    Ruksha, T.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 142 (12) : S209 - S209
  • [27] A "Cesarean Scar" - With No C-Section!
    Navarro Trivino, F. J.
    Linares Gonzalez, L.
    Rodenas Herranz, T.
    ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS, 2021, 112 (04): : 365 - 365
  • [28] Ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean section scar
    Chiang, An-Jen
    La, Victor
    Chou, Chen-Pin
    Wang, Peng-Hui
    Yu, Ken-Jen
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (07) : 2388 - 2389
  • [29] Saline contrast sonohysterography in the preoperative assessment of benign intrauterine disorders
    Bernard, JP
    Rizk, E
    Camatte, S
    Robin, F
    Taurelle, R
    Lecuru, F
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 17 (02) : 145 - 149
  • [30] Imaging of a cervicovaginal fistula using transvaginal saline contrast sonohysterography
    Rebarber, A
    Sfakianaki, A
    Monteagudo, A
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 18 (03) : 292 - 293