Evaluation of the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR kit RUO performances and limit of detection

被引:36
|
作者
Visseaux, Benoit [1 ,2 ]
Le Hingrat, Quentin [1 ,2 ]
Collin, Gilles [1 ,2 ]
Ferre, Valentine [1 ,2 ]
Storto, Alexandre [1 ,2 ]
Ichou, Houria [1 ]
Bouzid, Donia [2 ,3 ]
Poey, Nora [4 ]
de Montmollin, Etienne [5 ]
Descamps, Diane [1 ,2 ]
Houhou-Fidouh, Nadhira [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris, Hop Bichat, AP HP, Serv Virol, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris, INSERM, DeSCID Decis SCi Infect Dis Control & Care, UMR 1137,IAME, Paris, France
[3] Univ Paris, Hop Bichat, AP HP, Serv Accueil Urgences, Paris, France
[4] Univ Paris, Hop Bichat, AP HP, Serv Malad Infect & Trop, Paris, France
[5] Univ Paris, Hop Bichat, AP HP, Reanimat Med & Infect, Paris, France
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; RT-PCR; Sensitivity;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104520
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: The use of efficient, reliable and sensitive PCR assays is a cornerstone in the race to contain the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In this work we performed an independent evaluation of the RealStar (R) SARS-CoV-2 RTPCR Kit Researh Use Only (Altona) for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Methods: A comparative limit of detection (LoD) assessment was performed between RealStar (R) SARS-CoV-2 and the currently WHO recommended RT-PCR (WHO-PCR) workflow using a quantified clinical sample. Assessment of the RealStar (R) SARS-CoV-2 assay was also performed using 83 primary clinical samples in comparison with the WHO-PCR. Results: The RealStar (R) SARS-CoV-2 demonstrated a slightly higher sensitivity than the WHO recommended assay with a limit of detection at 625 copies/mL instead of 1250 copies/mL for the WHO-PCR in our conditions. The overall percent agreement between RealStar (R) SARS-CoV-2 and WHO-PCR on 83 clinical samples was 97.6 % (81/83) with a sensitivity at 97.8 % (45/46) and specificity at 97.3 % (36/37). No cross reaction was encountered for the other human coronaviruses (HKU1, OC43, NL63, 229E). Conclusions: In this comparison of the RealStar (R) SARS-CoV-2 assay with the reference WHO assay, we observed a slightly better sensitivity of the RealStar (R) assay. It provides a robust option for all molecular biology laboratories, with a strong real-life LoD and is compatible with various real-time PCR platforms.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of different genes in the RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory samples and its evolution in infection
    Reina, Jordi
    Suarez, Loreto
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE QUIMIOTERAPIA, 2020, 33 (04) : 292 - 293
  • [42] Usefulness of SARS-CoV-2 antigen test sample as input for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR analysis
    Garcia-Salguero, Cristina
    Culebras, Esther
    Merino, Paloma
    Baos, Elvira
    Delgado-Iribarren, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2022, 94 (04) : 1693 - 1695
  • [43] Clinical Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal, Oropharyngeal, Nasal Swabs, and Saliva for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by Direct RT-PCR
    Kiryanov, Sergei A.
    Levina, Tatiana A.
    Kadochnikova, Vladislava V.
    Konopleva, Maria V.
    Suslov, Anatoly P.
    Trofimov, Dmitry Yu.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (05)
  • [44] Evaluation of a New Standardized Nasal Sampling Method for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA via RT-PCR
    Koeleman, Johannes G. M.
    Mol, Sander
    Brand, Henk
    Ong, David S. Y.
    Choi, Changsun
    MICROORGANISMS, 2024, 12 (01)
  • [45] Performance of Chip Based Real Time RT-PCR (Truenat) and Conventional Real Time RT-PCR for Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Sahoo, Amiyabala
    Shulania, Anuradha
    Chhabra, Mala
    Kansra, Stuti
    Achra, Arvind
    Nirmal, Kirti
    Katiyar, Supriya
    Duggal, Nandini
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (11) : DC25 - DC28
  • [46] Evaluation of Saliva as a Matrix for RT-PCR Analysis and Two Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    De Meyer, Julie
    Goris, Hanne
    Mortele, Olivier
    Spiessens, An
    Hans, Guy
    Jansens, Hilde
    Goossens, Herman
    Matheeussen, Veerle
    Vandamme, Sarah
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2022, 14 (09):
  • [47] Comparison of real-time RT-PCR and RT-PCR/MALDI-TOF methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection in saliva
    Hernandez, Matthew M.
    Banu, Radhika
    Shrestha, Paras
    Patel, Armi
    Chen, Feng
    Cao, Liyong
    Fabre, Shelcie
    Tan, Jessica
    Lopez, Heidi
    Chiu, Numthip
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2021, 156 : S9 - S9
  • [48] Comparison of the SARS-CoV-2 Rapid antigen test to the real star Sars-CoV-2 RT PCR kit
    Kruettgen, Alexander
    Cornelissen, Christian G.
    Dreher, Michael
    Hornef, Mathias W.
    Imoehl, Matthias
    Kleines, Michael
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2021, 288
  • [49] Contamination of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR probes at the oligonucleotide manufacturer
    Wang, Claire Y. T.
    Buckley, Cameron
    Bletchly, Cheryl
    Harris, Patrick
    Whiley, David
    PATHOLOGY, 2020, 52 (07) : 814 - 816
  • [50] A new qualitative RT-PCR assay detecting SARS-CoV-2
    Favaro, Marco
    Mattina, Walter
    Pistoia, Enrico Salvatore
    Gaziano, Roberta
    Di Francesco, Paolo
    Middleton, Simon
    D'Angelo, Silvia
    Altarozzi, Tullio
    Fontana, Carla
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)