Evaluation of the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR kit RUO performances and limit of detection

被引:36
|
作者
Visseaux, Benoit [1 ,2 ]
Le Hingrat, Quentin [1 ,2 ]
Collin, Gilles [1 ,2 ]
Ferre, Valentine [1 ,2 ]
Storto, Alexandre [1 ,2 ]
Ichou, Houria [1 ]
Bouzid, Donia [2 ,3 ]
Poey, Nora [4 ]
de Montmollin, Etienne [5 ]
Descamps, Diane [1 ,2 ]
Houhou-Fidouh, Nadhira [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris, Hop Bichat, AP HP, Serv Virol, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris, INSERM, DeSCID Decis SCi Infect Dis Control & Care, UMR 1137,IAME, Paris, France
[3] Univ Paris, Hop Bichat, AP HP, Serv Accueil Urgences, Paris, France
[4] Univ Paris, Hop Bichat, AP HP, Serv Malad Infect & Trop, Paris, France
[5] Univ Paris, Hop Bichat, AP HP, Reanimat Med & Infect, Paris, France
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; RT-PCR; Sensitivity;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104520
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: The use of efficient, reliable and sensitive PCR assays is a cornerstone in the race to contain the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In this work we performed an independent evaluation of the RealStar (R) SARS-CoV-2 RTPCR Kit Researh Use Only (Altona) for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Methods: A comparative limit of detection (LoD) assessment was performed between RealStar (R) SARS-CoV-2 and the currently WHO recommended RT-PCR (WHO-PCR) workflow using a quantified clinical sample. Assessment of the RealStar (R) SARS-CoV-2 assay was also performed using 83 primary clinical samples in comparison with the WHO-PCR. Results: The RealStar (R) SARS-CoV-2 demonstrated a slightly higher sensitivity than the WHO recommended assay with a limit of detection at 625 copies/mL instead of 1250 copies/mL for the WHO-PCR in our conditions. The overall percent agreement between RealStar (R) SARS-CoV-2 and WHO-PCR on 83 clinical samples was 97.6 % (81/83) with a sensitivity at 97.8 % (45/46) and specificity at 97.3 % (36/37). No cross reaction was encountered for the other human coronaviruses (HKU1, OC43, NL63, 229E). Conclusions: In this comparison of the RealStar (R) SARS-CoV-2 assay with the reference WHO assay, we observed a slightly better sensitivity of the RealStar (R) assay. It provides a robust option for all molecular biology laboratories, with a strong real-life LoD and is compatible with various real-time PCR platforms.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sensitive detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 by multiplex droplet digital RT-PCR
    de Kock, Remco
    Baselmans, Mieke
    Scharnhorst, Volkher
    Deiman, Birgit
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 40 (04) : 807 - 813
  • [32] Sensitivity of ID NOW and RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in an ambulatory population
    Tu, Yuan-Po
    Iqbal, Jameel
    O'Leary, Timothy
    ELIFE, 2021, 10
  • [33] Authors' response: SARS-CoV-2 detection by real-time RT-PCR
    Corman, Victor M.
    Drosten, Christian
    EUROSURVEILLANCE, 2020, 25 (21): : 35 - 35
  • [34] Positive pleural fluid RT-PCR for virus detection in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia
    Malik, M. I.
    Fox, N.
    Chopra, A.
    Hughes, H. Y.
    Washburn, R.
    Huggins, J. T.
    QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 113 (12) : 888 - 889
  • [35] New RT-PCR Assay for the Detection of Current and Future SARS-CoV-2 Variants
    Marchini, Antonio
    Petrillo, Mauro
    Parrish, Amy
    Buttinger, Gerhard
    Tavazzi, Simona
    Querci, Maddalena
    Betsou, Fay
    Elsinga, Goffe
    Medema, Gertjan
    Abdelrahman, Tamir
    Gawlik, Bernd
    Corbisier, Philippe
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2023, 15 (01):
  • [36] Development of a rapid viability RT-PCR assay for detection of infectious SARS-CoV-2
    Veugen, Judith
    Schoenmakers, Tom
    van Loo, Inge
    Leers, Mathie
    Nuijts, Rudy
    Savelkoul, Paul
    Dickman, Mor
    Wolffs, Petra
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2023, 64 (08)
  • [37] Assessment of Real-Time RT-PCR Kits for SARS-CoV-2 Detection
    Okamaoto, Kiyoko
    Shirato, Kazuya
    Nao, Naganori
    Saito, Shinji
    Kageyama, Tsutomu
    Hasegawa, Hideki
    Suzuki, Tadaki
    Matsuyama, Shutoku
    Takeda, Makoto
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 73 (05) : 366 - 368
  • [38] Evaluation of two RT-PCR screening assays for identifying SARS-CoV-2 variants
    Migueres, M.
    Lhomme, S.
    Tremeaux, P.
    Dimeglio, C.
    Ranger, N.
    Latour, J.
    Dubois, M.
    Nicot, F.
    Miedouge, M.
    Mansuy, J. M.
    Izopet, J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 143
  • [39] Comparison of RT-PCR, RT-LAMP, and Antigen Quantification Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Tanimoto, Yoshihiko
    Mori, Ai
    Miyamoto, Sonoko
    Ito, Erika
    Arikawa, Kentaro
    Iwamoto, Tomotada
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 75 (03) : 249 - 253
  • [40] Validation of SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Saliva Samples by Real-Time PCR (RT-PCR)
    Melo, N. C.
    Silva, E. M.
    Tada, M. T.
    Silva, J. S. L.
    Nociti, D. A.
    Lima, A. S.
    Cavalcanti, C. F. A.
    Coudry, R. A.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 25 (06): : S39 - S39