Evaluation of the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR kit RUO performances and limit of detection

被引:36
|
作者
Visseaux, Benoit [1 ,2 ]
Le Hingrat, Quentin [1 ,2 ]
Collin, Gilles [1 ,2 ]
Ferre, Valentine [1 ,2 ]
Storto, Alexandre [1 ,2 ]
Ichou, Houria [1 ]
Bouzid, Donia [2 ,3 ]
Poey, Nora [4 ]
de Montmollin, Etienne [5 ]
Descamps, Diane [1 ,2 ]
Houhou-Fidouh, Nadhira [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris, Hop Bichat, AP HP, Serv Virol, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris, INSERM, DeSCID Decis SCi Infect Dis Control & Care, UMR 1137,IAME, Paris, France
[3] Univ Paris, Hop Bichat, AP HP, Serv Accueil Urgences, Paris, France
[4] Univ Paris, Hop Bichat, AP HP, Serv Malad Infect & Trop, Paris, France
[5] Univ Paris, Hop Bichat, AP HP, Reanimat Med & Infect, Paris, France
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; RT-PCR; Sensitivity;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104520
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: The use of efficient, reliable and sensitive PCR assays is a cornerstone in the race to contain the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In this work we performed an independent evaluation of the RealStar (R) SARS-CoV-2 RTPCR Kit Researh Use Only (Altona) for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Methods: A comparative limit of detection (LoD) assessment was performed between RealStar (R) SARS-CoV-2 and the currently WHO recommended RT-PCR (WHO-PCR) workflow using a quantified clinical sample. Assessment of the RealStar (R) SARS-CoV-2 assay was also performed using 83 primary clinical samples in comparison with the WHO-PCR. Results: The RealStar (R) SARS-CoV-2 demonstrated a slightly higher sensitivity than the WHO recommended assay with a limit of detection at 625 copies/mL instead of 1250 copies/mL for the WHO-PCR in our conditions. The overall percent agreement between RealStar (R) SARS-CoV-2 and WHO-PCR on 83 clinical samples was 97.6 % (81/83) with a sensitivity at 97.8 % (45/46) and specificity at 97.3 % (36/37). No cross reaction was encountered for the other human coronaviruses (HKU1, OC43, NL63, 229E). Conclusions: In this comparison of the RealStar (R) SARS-CoV-2 assay with the reference WHO assay, we observed a slightly better sensitivity of the RealStar (R) assay. It provides a robust option for all molecular biology laboratories, with a strong real-life LoD and is compatible with various real-time PCR platforms.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of a real-time RT-PCR panel for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in bat guano
    Anis, Eman
    Turner, Greg
    Ellis, Julie C.
    Di Salvo, Andrew
    Barnard, Amanda
    Carroll, Susan
    Murphy, Lisa
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 2021, 33 (02) : 331 - 335
  • [22] Performance Evaluation of Different RT-PCR Kits for the Direct Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Preheated Specimens
    Jain, Rajeev Kumar
    Perumal, Nagaraj
    Chaurasia, Deepti
    Shrivastava, Rakesh
    Ahirwar, Kamlesh Kumar
    Sharma, Archa
    Kapoor, Garima
    Lalwani, Jaya
    JOURNAL OF LABORATORY PHYSICIANS, 2023, 15 (03) : 383 - 391
  • [23] Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of nine commercial RT-PCR kits for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Colombia
    Hernandez, Carolina
    Florez, Carolina
    Castaneda, Sergio
    Ballesteros, Nathalia
    Martinez, David
    Castillo, Adriana
    Munoz, Marina
    Gomez, Sergio
    Rico, Angelica
    Pardo, Liseth
    Paniz-Mondolfi, Alberto
    Ramirez, Juan David
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (09) : 5618 - 5622
  • [24] Analytical Evaluation of Visby Medical RT-PCR Portable Device for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Renzoni, Adriana
    Perez, Francisco
    Ngo Nsoga, Marie Therese
    Yerly, Sabine
    Boehm, Erik
    Gayet-Ageron, Angele
    Kaiser, Laurent
    Schibler, Manuel
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (05)
  • [25] Extraction-Free Rapid Cycle Quantitative RT-PCR and Extreme RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Virus Detection
    Lownik, Joseph C.
    Way, Grayson W.
    Farrar, Jared S.
    Martin, Rebecca K.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 23 (12): : 1671 - 1679
  • [26] Sensitive detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 by multiplex droplet digital RT-PCR
    Remco de Kock
    Mieke Baselmans
    Volkher Scharnhorst
    Birgit Deiman
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2021, 40 : 807 - 813
  • [27] Evaluating diagnostic accuracy of an RT-PCR test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva
    Samsunder, Natasha
    Sivro, Aida
    Hassan-Moosa, Razia
    Lewis, Lara
    Kara, Zahra
    Baxter, Cheryl
    Karim, Quarraisha Abdool
    Karim, Salim Abdool
    Kharsany, Ayesha B. M.
    Naidoo, Kogieleum
    Ngcapu, Sinaye
    DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2024, 8 (01)
  • [28] Letter to the editor: SARS-CoV-2 detection by real-time RT-PCR
    Pillonel, Trestan
    Scherz, Valentin
    Jaton, Katia
    Greub, Gilbert
    Bertelli, Claire
    EUROSURVEILLANCE, 2020, 25 (21): : 33 - 34
  • [29] Development of a rapid viability RT-PCR assay for detection of infectious SARS-CoV-2
    Veugen, J. M. J.
    Schoenmakers, T.
    van Loo, I. H. M.
    Haagmans, B. L.
    Leers, M. P. G.
    Nuijts, R. M. M. A.
    Savelkoul, P. H. M.
    Wolffs, P. F. G.
    Dickman, M. M.
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2023, 101 : 4 - 4
  • [30] Assessment of 12 qualitative RT-PCR commercial kits for the detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Altamimi, Asmaa M.
    Obeid, Dalia A.
    Alaifan, Taghreed A.
    Taha, Moroje T.
    Alhothali, Marwa T.
    Alzahrani, Fahad A.
    Albarrag, Ahmad M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (05) : 3219 - 3226