Evaluation of the Risk of Laboratory Microbial Contamination during Routine Testing in Automated Clinical Chemistry and Microbiology Laboratories

被引:8
|
作者
Farnsworth, Christopher W. [1 ]
Wallace, Meghan A. [1 ]
Liu, Albert [1 ]
Gronowski, Ann M. [1 ]
Burnham, Carey-Ann D. [1 ]
Yarbrough, Melanie L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Pathol & Immunol, Sch Med, 425 So Euclid Ave,Campus Box 8118, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
UNITED-STATES; INFECTIONS;
D O I
10.1093/clinchem/hvaa128
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Every clinical specimen is potentially infectious, but data regarding risk for contamination of the laboratory environment during routine testing are scarce. We assessed contamination during routine sample analysis in automated clinical chemistry and microbiology laboratories. METHODS: A fluorescent marker was applied to specimen container exteriors to assess the impact of gross contamination. Nonpathogenic MS2 virus was added to remnant blood, urine, and ESwab matrices as a biomarker of cross-contamination. Samples were processed and analyzed using Roche Cobas 8100 and ISE, c502, e602, and c702 modules (blood) and BD Kiestra total laboratory automation (blood, urine, ESwabs) over 3 experiments. Fluorescence transfer to laboratory surfaces and personnel was visualized using ultraviolet light. Surfaces were swabbed and assessed for MS2 cross-contamination by RT-PCR. Adherence to standard precautions by laboratory staff was assessed by observation. RESULTS: Fluorescence was observed on 49 of 165 (30%) laboratory surfaces and personnel and 21 of 93 (23%) total laboratory automation instruments. Fluorescence transferred most frequently to gloves (31/40), computer accessories (9/18), and specimen loading racks (12/12). None of 123 areas swabbed were positive for MS2. Improper personal protective equipment use occurred at a rate of 0.36 and 0.15 events per staff per hour in the chemistry and microbiology laboratories, respectively. Hand-washing compliance was observed for 61 of 132 (46%) staff members evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of grossly contaminated specimens on automated chemistry and microbiology equipment elicits a low likelihood of instrument contamination. However, handling contaminated specimen containers can result in contamination of environmental laboratory surfaces, representing a source of risk that is heightened by low adherence to appropriate personal protective equipment.
引用
收藏
页码:1190 / 1199
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation of Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Guidelines in a Routine Clinical Microbiology Laboratory Exemplifies General Key Challenges in Setting Clinical Breakpoints
    Hombach, Michael
    Courvalin, Patrice
    Boettger, Erik C.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2014, 58 (07) : 3921 - 3926
  • [22] Real-time PCR in clinical microbiology: Applications for routine laboratory testing (vol 19, pg 165, 2006)
    Espy, M. J.
    Uhl, J. R.
    Sloan, L. A.
    Buckwalter, S. P.
    Jones, M. F.
    Vetter, E. A.
    Yao, J. D. C.
    Wengenack, N. L.
    Rosenblatt, J. E.
    Cockerill, F. R.
    Smith, T. F.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2006, 19 (03) : 595 - 595
  • [23] Total Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Errors and Evaluation of the Analytical Quality Control Using Sigma Metric for Routine Clinical Chemistry Tests
    Teshome, Mulugeta
    Worede, Abebaw
    Asmelash, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTHCARE, 2021, 14 : 125 - 136
  • [24] Chromogenic urinary tract infection medium: evaluation and introduction for routine urine culture in a large clinical microbiology laboratory
    Baker, M
    Cheetham, P
    Shing, J
    Yau, N
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 58 (04) : 207 - 211
  • [25] CLINICAL LABORATORY EVALUATION OF AUTOMATED MICROBIAL DETECTION-IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM IN ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL URINE SPECIMENS
    ISENBERG, HD
    GAVAN, TL
    SONNENWIRTH, A
    TAYLOR, WI
    WASHINGTON, JA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1979, 10 (02) : 226 - 230
  • [26] Evaluation of the BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of common clinical isolates
    Liu, ZK
    Ling, TK
    Cheng, AF
    MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2005, 14 (04) : 250 - 254
  • [27] Six sigma metric evaluations of routine biochemistry parameters and glycated hemoglobin in a fully automated clinical chemistry laboratory
    Pokhrel, R.
    Pokhrel, N.
    Pokhrel, S.
    Chaudhary, A.
    Khadka, N. B.
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2022, 530 : S394 - S394
  • [28] CLINICAL LABORATORY EVALUATION OF THE ABBOTT MS-2 AUTOMATED ANTI-MICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING SYSTEM - REPORT OF A COLLABORATIVE STUDY
    THORNSBERRY, C
    ANHALT, JP
    WASHINGTON, JA
    MCCARTHY, LR
    SCHOENKNECHT, FD
    SHERRIS, JC
    SPENCER, HJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1980, 12 (03) : 375 - 390
  • [29] Impact of clinical practice guidelines on the clinical microbiology laboratory when using automated blood culture systems for bacterial contamination screening of apheresis platelet products
    Stutzman, LC
    Sullivan, N
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 42 (12) : 5963 - 5963
  • [30] Analysis of the clinical outcomes of microbial contamination caused by environmental contamination of the embryology laboratory during IVF-ET treatment cycles
    Zheng, Tingting
    Li, Qinhua
    Chen, Ningjing
    Du, Peiyao
    Ye, Hong
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2023, 23 (01)