Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment - a review

被引:146
|
作者
Helin, Tuomas [1 ]
Sokka, Laura [1 ]
Soimakallio, Sampo [1 ]
Pingoud, Kim [1 ]
Pajula, Tiina [1 ]
机构
[1] VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland, FI-02044 Espoo, Vtt, Finland
来源
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY | 2013年 / 5卷 / 05期
关键词
boreal; climate change; climate indicators; forest carbon cycle; life cycle assessment; BOREAL FORESTS; BIOENERGY; IMPACTS; EMISSIONS; SUBSTITUTION; MANAGEMENT; AEROSOLS; BIOMASS; STORAGE; LCA;
D O I
10.1111/gcbb.12016
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Forests are a significant pool of terrestrial carbon. A key feature related to forest biomass harvesting and use is the typical time difference between carbon release into and sequestration from the atmosphere. Traditionally, the use of sustainably grown biomass has been considered as carbon neutral in life cycle assessment (LCA) studies. However, various approaches to account for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and sinks of forest biomass acquisition and use have also been developed and applied, resulting in different conclusions on climate impacts of forest products. The aim of this study is to summarize, clarify, and assess the suitability of these approaches for LCA. A literature review is carried out, and the results are analyzed through an assessment framework. The different approaches are reviewed through their approach to the definition of reference land-use situation, consideration of time frame and timing of carbon emissions and sequestration, substitution credits, and indicators applied to measure climate impacts. On the basis of the review, it is concluded that, to account for GHG emissions and the related climate impacts objectively, biomass carbon stored in the products and the timing of sinks and emissions should be taken into account in LCA. The reference situation for forest land use has to be defined appropriately, describing the development in the absence of the studied system. We suggest the use of some climate impact indicator that takes the timing of the emissions and sinks into consideration and enables the use of different time frames. If substitution credits are considered, they need to be transparently presented in the results. Instead of carbon stock values taken from the literature, the use of dynamic forest models is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 486
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A review of forest carbon cycle models on spatiotemporal scales
    Zhao, Junfang
    Liu, Dongsheng
    Zhu, Yujie
    Peng, Huiwen
    Xie, Hongfei
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 339
  • [42] Life cycle approaches to sustainable consumption: A critical review
    Hertwich, EG
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 39 (13) : 4673 - 4684
  • [43] Accounting for soil carbon changes in agricultural life cycle assessment (LCA): a review
    Goglio, Pietro
    Smith, Ward N.
    Grant, Brian B.
    Desjardins, Raymond L.
    McConkey, Brian G.
    Campbell, Con A.
    Nemecek, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 104 : 23 - 39
  • [44] Review: life-cycle assessment, water footprinting, and carbon footprinting in Portugal
    Burman, Nicholas W.
    Croft, Joel
    Engelbrecht, Shaun
    Ladenika, A. O.
    MacGregor, O. S.
    Maepa, Mpho
    Bodunrin, Michael Oluwatosin
    Harding, Kevin G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (08): : 1693 - 1700
  • [45] Sustainable Conversion of Carbon Dioxide: An Integrated Review of Catalysis and Life Cycle Assessment
    Artz, Jens
    Mueller, Thomas E.
    Thenert, Katharina
    Kleinekorte, Johanna
    Meys, Raoul
    Sternberg, Andre
    Bardow, Andre
    Leitner, Walter
    CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2018, 118 (02) : 434 - 504
  • [46] Review: life-cycle assessment, water footprinting, and carbon footprinting in Portugal
    Nicholas W. Burman
    Joel Croft
    Shaun Engelbrecht
    A. O. Ladenika
    O. S. MacGregor
    Mpho Maepa
    Michael Oluwatosin Bodunrin
    Kevin G. Harding
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 1693 - 1700
  • [47] Environmental sustainability assessment of poultry productions through life cycle approaches: A critical review
    Costantini, Michele
    Ferrante, Valentina
    Guarino, Marcella
    Bacenetti, Jacopo
    TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 110 : 201 - 212
  • [48] Life cycle assessment in aviation: A systematic literature review of applications, methodological approaches and challenges
    Keiser, Dennis
    Schnoor, Lars Henrik
    Pupkes, Birte
    Freitag, Michael
    JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2023, 110
  • [49] Sustainability and Life Cycle Assessment in Industrial Biotechnology: A Review of Current Approaches and Future Needs
    Froehling, Magnus
    Hiete, Michael
    SUSTAINABILITY AND LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT IN INDUSTRIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 173 : 143 - 203
  • [50] Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: A review
    Moni, Sheikh Moniruzzaman
    Mahmud, Roksana
    High, Karen
    Carbajales-Dale, Michael
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 24 (01) : 52 - 63