Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment - a review

被引:146
|
作者
Helin, Tuomas [1 ]
Sokka, Laura [1 ]
Soimakallio, Sampo [1 ]
Pingoud, Kim [1 ]
Pajula, Tiina [1 ]
机构
[1] VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland, FI-02044 Espoo, Vtt, Finland
来源
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY | 2013年 / 5卷 / 05期
关键词
boreal; climate change; climate indicators; forest carbon cycle; life cycle assessment; BOREAL FORESTS; BIOENERGY; IMPACTS; EMISSIONS; SUBSTITUTION; MANAGEMENT; AEROSOLS; BIOMASS; STORAGE; LCA;
D O I
10.1111/gcbb.12016
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Forests are a significant pool of terrestrial carbon. A key feature related to forest biomass harvesting and use is the typical time difference between carbon release into and sequestration from the atmosphere. Traditionally, the use of sustainably grown biomass has been considered as carbon neutral in life cycle assessment (LCA) studies. However, various approaches to account for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and sinks of forest biomass acquisition and use have also been developed and applied, resulting in different conclusions on climate impacts of forest products. The aim of this study is to summarize, clarify, and assess the suitability of these approaches for LCA. A literature review is carried out, and the results are analyzed through an assessment framework. The different approaches are reviewed through their approach to the definition of reference land-use situation, consideration of time frame and timing of carbon emissions and sequestration, substitution credits, and indicators applied to measure climate impacts. On the basis of the review, it is concluded that, to account for GHG emissions and the related climate impacts objectively, biomass carbon stored in the products and the timing of sinks and emissions should be taken into account in LCA. The reference situation for forest land use has to be defined appropriately, describing the development in the absence of the studied system. We suggest the use of some climate impact indicator that takes the timing of the emissions and sinks into consideration and enables the use of different time frames. If substitution credits are considered, they need to be transparently presented in the results. Instead of carbon stock values taken from the literature, the use of dynamic forest models is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 486
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life cycle assessment of carbon dioxide removal technologies: A critical review
    Terlouw, Tom
    Bauer, Christian
    Rosa, Lorenzo
    Mazzotti, Marco
    Energy and Environmental Science, 2021, 14 (04): : 1701 - 1721
  • [22] Life cycle assessment of carbon dioxide removal technologies: a critical review
    Terlouw, Tom
    Bauer, Christian
    Rosa, Lorenzo
    Mazzotti, Marco
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 14 (04) : 1701 - 1721
  • [23] Environmental life cycle assessment of algae systems: Critical review of modelling approaches
    Braud, L.
    McDonnell, K.
    Murphy, F.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2023, 179
  • [24] Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment: A Review of Research for Temporal Variations in Life Cycle Assessment Studies
    Su, Shu
    Li, Xiaodong
    Zhu, Chen
    Lu, Yujie
    Lee, Hyun Woo
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2021, 38 (11) : 1013 - 1026
  • [25] Life cycle energy analysis and environmental life cycle assessment of carbon nanofibers production
    Khanna, Vikas
    Bakshi, Bhavik R.
    Lee, L. James
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONICS & THE ENVIRONMENT, CONFERENCE RECORD, 2007, : 128 - +
  • [26] A critical analysis of the carbon neutrality assumption in life cycle assessment of forest bioenergy systems
    Liu, Weiguo
    Yu, Zhen
    Xie, Xinfeng
    von Gadow, Klaus
    Peng, Changhui
    ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS, 2018, 26 (01): : 93 - 101
  • [27] Carbon footprinting, labelling and life cycle assessment
    Schmidt, Hans-Jürgen
    International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2009, 14 (SUPPL. 1): : 6 - 9
  • [28] Carbon footprint - A catalyst for life cycle assessment?
    Weidema, Bo P.
    Thrane, Mikkel
    Christensen, Per
    Schmidt, Jannick
    Lokke, Soren
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2008, 12 (01) : 3 - 6
  • [29] Life Cycle Assessment: Quantitative Approaches for Decisions That Matter
    Weidema, Bo
    Brandao, Miguel
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 24 (03) : 726 - 730
  • [30] Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment
    Hellweg, Stefanie
    Mila i Canals, Llorenc
    SCIENCE, 2014, 344 (6188) : 1109 - 1113