Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment - a review

被引:146
|
作者
Helin, Tuomas [1 ]
Sokka, Laura [1 ]
Soimakallio, Sampo [1 ]
Pingoud, Kim [1 ]
Pajula, Tiina [1 ]
机构
[1] VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland, FI-02044 Espoo, Vtt, Finland
来源
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY | 2013年 / 5卷 / 05期
关键词
boreal; climate change; climate indicators; forest carbon cycle; life cycle assessment; BOREAL FORESTS; BIOENERGY; IMPACTS; EMISSIONS; SUBSTITUTION; MANAGEMENT; AEROSOLS; BIOMASS; STORAGE; LCA;
D O I
10.1111/gcbb.12016
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Forests are a significant pool of terrestrial carbon. A key feature related to forest biomass harvesting and use is the typical time difference between carbon release into and sequestration from the atmosphere. Traditionally, the use of sustainably grown biomass has been considered as carbon neutral in life cycle assessment (LCA) studies. However, various approaches to account for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and sinks of forest biomass acquisition and use have also been developed and applied, resulting in different conclusions on climate impacts of forest products. The aim of this study is to summarize, clarify, and assess the suitability of these approaches for LCA. A literature review is carried out, and the results are analyzed through an assessment framework. The different approaches are reviewed through their approach to the definition of reference land-use situation, consideration of time frame and timing of carbon emissions and sequestration, substitution credits, and indicators applied to measure climate impacts. On the basis of the review, it is concluded that, to account for GHG emissions and the related climate impacts objectively, biomass carbon stored in the products and the timing of sinks and emissions should be taken into account in LCA. The reference situation for forest land use has to be defined appropriately, describing the development in the absence of the studied system. We suggest the use of some climate impact indicator that takes the timing of the emissions and sinks into consideration and enables the use of different time frames. If substitution credits are considered, they need to be transparently presented in the results. Instead of carbon stock values taken from the literature, the use of dynamic forest models is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 486
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A systematic review of consequential life cycle assessment in whole building life cycle assessment
    Udisi, B.
    Gorgolewski, M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 7 (02):
  • [12] Data Mining Approaches for Life Cycle Assessment
    Sundaravaradan, Naren
    Marwah, Manish
    Shah, Amip
    Ramakrishnan, Naren
    2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY (ISSST), 2011,
  • [13] Matrix approaches to abridged life cycle assessment
    Graedel, T.E.
    Allenby, H.R.
    Comrie, P.R.
    Environmental Science and Technology, 1995, 29 (03):
  • [14] Radiological impact assessment approaches for Life Cycle Assessment: a review and possible ways forward
    Paulillo, Andrea
    Clift, Roland
    Dodds, Jonathan
    Milliken, Andrew
    Palethorpe, Stephen J.
    Lettieri, Paola
    ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS, 2018, 26 (03): : 239 - 254
  • [15] Life cycle assessment of fertilizers: a review
    Skowronska, Monika
    Filipek, Tadeusz
    INTERNATIONAL AGROPHYSICS, 2014, 28 (01) : 101 - 110
  • [16] Consequential life cycle assessment: a review
    J. Mason Earles
    Anthony Halog
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2011, 16 : 445 - 453
  • [17] Consequential life cycle assessment: a review
    Earles, J. Mason
    Halog, Anthony
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2011, 16 (05): : 445 - 453
  • [18] Life cycle assessment of buildings: A review
    Sharma, Aashish
    Saxena, Abhishek
    Sethi, Muneesh
    Shree, Venu
    Varun
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (01): : 871 - 875
  • [19] Life Cycle assessment of denim: A review
    Periyasamy, Aravin Prince
    Colourage, 2019, 66 (04):
  • [20] Exergetic Life Cycle Assessment: A Review
    Nwodo, Martin N.
    Anumba, Chimay J.
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (11)