The ventriculoatrial relationship after atrial overdrive pacing can help differentiate atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia from junctional tachycardia

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Lichun [1 ]
Jiang, Jingzhou [1 ]
Su, Chen [1 ]
Feng, Chong [1 ]
Chen, Yili [1 ]
Liu, Jun [1 ]
He, Jiangui [1 ]
Tang, Anli [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Cardiol, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; Non-reentrant junctional tachycardia; VA relationship; Atrial overdrive pacing; SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA; CATHETER ABLATION; EXTRASTIMULUS; MANEUVERS;
D O I
10.1007/s10840-016-0178-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Differentiating between atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and non-reentrant junctional tachycardia (JT) is difficult but highly necessary for catheter ablation. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the ventriculoatrial (VA) relationship after atrial overdrive pacing (AOP) could help to distinguish AVNRT from JT. Thirty-eight AVNRT and 21 JT patients who were induced by infusion of isoproterenol after successful AVNRT ablation were paced through the high right atrium or coronary sinus until the ventricles were constantly captured. After the pacing was stopped, the intervals of postpacing VA (VA(P)) and tachycardia VA (VA(T)) were measured if the pacing did not terminate tachycardia. Thirty-five (92.1 %) cases were captured by 119 AOPs (119/175) without terminating tachycardia in the 38 cases of AVNRT. Of the 35 cases, 34 (97.1 %) showed VA(P)-VA(T) < 22.55 ms in all successful AOPs (116 times). The remaining case showed VA(P)-VA(T) > 294.9 ms in one AOP and VA(P)-VA(T) < 22.55 ms in two AOPs. All 21 JT cases could be captured successfully by all (105/105) AOPs and showed VA(P)-VA(T) > 294.9 ms. VA(P)-VA(T) < 22.55 ms had 118/118 (100 %) specificity for AVNRT, and the VA(P)-VA(T) > 294.9 ms response was 105/105 (100 %) sensitive for JT. The VA relationship after AOP could help distinguish AVNRT from JT. VA(P)-VA(T) < 22.55 ms was specific for AVNRT, and VA(P)-VA(T) > 294.9 ms for JT in the overwhelming majority, except for the rare instance of AVNRT with a double ventricular response.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 298
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Specific Sign for Differential Diagnosis of Atypical Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia from Atrial Tachycardia
    Hirai, Yukoh
    Wen, Ming-Shien
    Yeh, San-Jou
    Delong-Wu
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 35 (02): : 245 - 248
  • [32] Dissimilar atrial rhythms: coexistence of reentrant atrial tachycardia, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and interatrial conduction block
    Schreieck, J
    Zrenner, B
    Dong, J
    Ndrepepa, G
    Schmitt, C
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 2002, 91 (01): : 68 - 73
  • [33] Dissimilar atrial rhythms: coexistence of reentrant atrial tachycardia, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and interatrial conduction block
    Jürgen Schreieck
    Bernhard Zrenner
    Jun Dong
    Gjin Ndrepepa
    Claus Schmitt
    Zeitschrift für Kardiologie, 2002, 91 : 68 - 73
  • [34] Ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: analysis of retrograde conduction and tachycardia type. Results from the ATAV Study (Atrioventricular nodal reentrant Tachycardia and Atrial Vulnerability Study)
    Purnode, Philippe
    Goethals, Peter
    Blommaert, Dominique
    Ballant, Elisabeth
    Collet, Benoit
    Bertholet, Catherine
    Dormal, Fabien
    Deceuninck, Olivier
    Xhaet, Olivier
    De Roy, Luc
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2009, 64 (01) : 121 - 122
  • [35] Junctional rhythm during cryoablation for typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
    Nakano, Masahiro
    Kondo, Yusuke
    Kajiyama, Takatsugu
    Nakano, Miyo
    Ito, Ryo
    Kitagawa, Mari
    Sugawara, Masafumi
    Chiba, Toshinori
    Ryuzaki, Satoko
    Yoshino, Yutaka
    Komai, Yuya
    Takanashi, Yukiko
    Kobayashi, Yoshio
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 34 (08) : 1665 - 1670
  • [36] COMPUTER-MODEL OF THE EFFECTS OF OVERDRIVE PACING DURING ATRIOVENTRICULAR REENTRANT TACHYCARDIA
    MALIK, M
    CAMM, AJ
    IMAGES OF THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY, PTS 1-6, 1989, 11 : 96 - 97
  • [37] The Utility of a Lewis Lead for Distinguishing Atrioventricular Reentrant Tachycardia from Typical Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia
    Yazaki, Yoshinao
    Satomi, Kazuhiro
    Chikamori, Taishiro
    INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 61 (11) : 1645 - 1651
  • [38] Differentiating atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia from junctional tachycardia: Novel application of the delta H-A interval
    Srivathsan, Komandoor
    Gami, Apoor S.
    Barrett, Renee
    Monahan, Kristi
    Packer, Douglas L.
    Asirvatham, Samuel J.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 19 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [39] Limitations of ventricular pacing maneuvers to differentiate orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia from atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia
    Péter Kupó
    Cristina Ioana Tutuianu
    Genadi Kaninski
    Zoltán Gingl
    László Sághy
    Róbert Pap
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2022, 63 : 323 - 331
  • [40] Limitations of ventricular pacing maneuvers to differentiate orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia from atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia
    Kupo, Peter
    Tutuianu, Cristina Ioana
    Kaninski, Genadi
    Gingl, Zoltan
    Saghy, Laszlo
    Pap, Robert
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 63 (02) : 323 - 331