The ventriculoatrial relationship after atrial overdrive pacing can help differentiate atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia from junctional tachycardia

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Lichun [1 ]
Jiang, Jingzhou [1 ]
Su, Chen [1 ]
Feng, Chong [1 ]
Chen, Yili [1 ]
Liu, Jun [1 ]
He, Jiangui [1 ]
Tang, Anli [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Cardiol, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; Non-reentrant junctional tachycardia; VA relationship; Atrial overdrive pacing; SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA; CATHETER ABLATION; EXTRASTIMULUS; MANEUVERS;
D O I
10.1007/s10840-016-0178-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Differentiating between atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and non-reentrant junctional tachycardia (JT) is difficult but highly necessary for catheter ablation. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the ventriculoatrial (VA) relationship after atrial overdrive pacing (AOP) could help to distinguish AVNRT from JT. Thirty-eight AVNRT and 21 JT patients who were induced by infusion of isoproterenol after successful AVNRT ablation were paced through the high right atrium or coronary sinus until the ventricles were constantly captured. After the pacing was stopped, the intervals of postpacing VA (VA(P)) and tachycardia VA (VA(T)) were measured if the pacing did not terminate tachycardia. Thirty-five (92.1 %) cases were captured by 119 AOPs (119/175) without terminating tachycardia in the 38 cases of AVNRT. Of the 35 cases, 34 (97.1 %) showed VA(P)-VA(T) < 22.55 ms in all successful AOPs (116 times). The remaining case showed VA(P)-VA(T) > 294.9 ms in one AOP and VA(P)-VA(T) < 22.55 ms in two AOPs. All 21 JT cases could be captured successfully by all (105/105) AOPs and showed VA(P)-VA(T) > 294.9 ms. VA(P)-VA(T) < 22.55 ms had 118/118 (100 %) specificity for AVNRT, and the VA(P)-VA(T) > 294.9 ms response was 105/105 (100 %) sensitive for JT. The VA relationship after AOP could help distinguish AVNRT from JT. VA(P)-VA(T) < 22.55 ms was specific for AVNRT, and VA(P)-VA(T) > 294.9 ms for JT in the overwhelming majority, except for the rare instance of AVNRT with a double ventricular response.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 298
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Differentiating Orthodromic Reciprocating Tachycardia From Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia
    Dandamudi, Gopi
    HEART RHYTHM, 2011, 8 (02) : E2 - E3
  • [42] Inducibility of atrial flutter in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
    Takagi, Yasuhiro
    Watanabe, Ichiro
    Okumura, Yasuo
    Okubo, Kimie
    Ashino, Sonoko
    Kofune, Masayoshi
    Hashimoto, Kenichi
    Shindo, Atsushi
    Sugimura, Hidezou
    Nakai, Toshiko
    Saito, Satoshi
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2006, 70 (09) : 1133 - 1137
  • [43] Can successful radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia be predicted by pattern of junctional ectopy?
    Nikoo, Mohammad Hossein
    Emkanjoo, Zahra
    Jorat, Mohammad Vahid
    Kharazi, Ali
    Alizadeh, Abolfath
    Fazelifar, Amir Fariam
    Sadr-Ameli, Mohammad Ali
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2008, 41 (01) : 39 - 43
  • [44] Atrial Tachycardia as a Proarrhythmic Effect of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia
    Beninati, Serena
    Perversi, Jacopo
    Scaglione, Marco
    Montefusco, Antonio
    Gaita, Fiorenzo
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 34 (04): : e33 - e37
  • [45] Atrial tachycardia with slow pathway conduction mimicking typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
    Yamada, Takumi
    Huizar, Jose F.
    McElderry, Hugh T.
    Kay, G. Neal
    EUROPACE, 2007, 9 (05): : 299 - 301
  • [46] Incidence and clinical significance of inducible atrial tachycardia in patients: With atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
    Sticherling, C
    Tada, H
    Greenstein, R
    Chan, CW
    Chough, SP
    Baker, RL
    Wasmer, K
    Oral, H
    Pelosi, F
    Knight, BP
    Strickberger, SA
    Morady, F
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 12 (05) : 507 - 510
  • [47] Differential Entrainment Distinguishes Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia from Atrioventricular Reentrant Tachycardia
    Khan, Aamir H.
    Khadem, Aliasghar
    Basta, Magdy N.
    Gardner, Martin J.
    Parkash, Ratika
    Gula, Lorne J.
    Sapp, John L.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 33 (11): : 1335 - 1341
  • [48] Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Clinical and electrophysiological features and predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence following elimination of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
    Amasyali, B
    Kose, S
    Aytemir, K
    Kilic, A
    Heper, G
    Kursaklioglu, H
    Iyisoy, A
    Celik, T
    Kaya, EB
    Isik, E
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 13 (03) : 195 - 201
  • [49] PATIENTS WITH ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODAL REENTRANT TACHYCARDIA HAVE A HIGH INCIDENCE OF ATRIAL VULNERABILITY. RESULTS FROM THE ATAV STUDY (ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODAL REENTRANT TACHYCARDIA AND ATRIAL VULNERABILITY STUDY)
    Purnode, P.
    Goethals, P.
    Blommaert, D.
    Xhaet, O.
    Deceuninck, O.
    Collet, B.
    Bertholet, C.
    Godeaux, V.
    Ballant, E.
    Dormal, F.
    De Roy, L.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 20 : S107 - S107
  • [50] Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical and Electrophysiological Features and Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Following Elimination of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia
    Basri Amasyali
    Sedat Kose
    Kudret Aytemir
    Ayhan Kilic
    Gulumser Heper
    Hurkan Kursaklioglu
    Atila Iyisoy
    Turgay Celik
    E. Bariş Kaya
    Ersoy Isik
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2005, 13 : 195 - 201