Production and Economic Effects of Environmentally Friendly Spring Wheat Production Technology

被引:7
|
作者
Haliniarz, Malgorzata [1 ]
Nowak, Anna [2 ]
Wozniak, Andrzej [1 ]
Sekutowski, Tomasz R. [3 ,4 ]
Kwiatkowski, Cezary A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Life Sci Lublin, Dept Weed Sci & Plant Cultivat, Lublin, Poland
[2] Univ Life Sci Lublin, Dept Econ & Agribusiness, Lublin, Poland
[3] Dept Weed Sci & Tillage Syst, Wroclaw, Poland
[4] Natl Res Inst, Inst Soil Sci & Plant Cultivat, Pulawy, Poland
来源
关键词
cultivation technology; economic results; grain quality; Triticum aestivum; yield;
D O I
10.15244/pjoes/77073
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to evaluate yield, grain quality characteristics, and cost-effectiveness of different crop protection methods in the cultivation of spring wheat using two levels of mineral fertilization of crops. The study shows that the combined application of the herbicide Lintur 70 WG (dicamba and triasulfuron) with ethephon or chlormequat chloride did not adversely affect spring wheat productivity. The highest yield was obtained in the treatment with intensive fertilization (5.18 t ha(-1)) and in the treatments with the application of herbicide in combination with ethephon (5.26 t ha(-1)). The chemical crop protection methods caused significant differences in grain test weight. In turn, mineral fertilization modified all the studied grain quality characteristics. An analysis of the indicators used to evaluate the economic effects of the spring wheat production technologies investigated showed a clear advantage of the lower intensity technology over the more intensive technologies, which should be associated with the high costs of mineral fertilization that were not compensated by the yields obtained. In analyzing the production and economic effects, treatment with the application of the herbicide in combination with ethephon under basic mineral fertilization conditions proved to be most beneficial.
引用
收藏
页码:1523 / 1532
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PRODUCTION OF ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY BIODIESEL BY ENZYMATIC OIL TRANSESTERIFICATION
    Bendikiene, Vida
    Kiriliauskaite, Vita
    Juodka, Benediktas
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 19 (02) : 123 - 129
  • [32] ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY PRODUCTION OF CHROME-TANNED LEATHERS
    DUNHILL, KG
    JACKLIN, CN
    GRANT, SM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN LEATHER CHEMISTS ASSOCIATION, 1990, 85 (07): : 225 - 233
  • [33] Novel inoculants for an environmentally-friendly crop production
    Kozyrovska, N
    Kovtunovych, G
    Gromosova, E
    Kuharchuk, P
    Kordyum, V
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 1996, 18 (1-4) : 79 - 85
  • [34] Development of a new environmentally friendly production process for terbinafine
    Beutler, U
    Mazacek, J
    Penn, G
    Schenkel, B
    Wasmuth, D
    CHIMIA, 1996, 50 (04) : 154 - 156
  • [35] Environmentally Friendly Production of Unconventional Natural Gas Resources
    Haut, R. C.
    Burnett, D.
    Williams, T.
    NANOTECH CONFERENCE & EXPO 2009, VOL 3, TECHNICAL PROCEEDINGS: NANOTECHNOLOGY 2009: BIOFUELS, RENEWABLE ENERGY, COATINGS FLUIDICS AND COMPACT MODELING, 2009, : 70 - +
  • [36] An improved process for the production of environmentally friendly diesel fuels
    Grootjans, J
    Olivier, C
    HYDROTREATMENT AND HYDROCRACKING OF OIL FRACTIONS, 1997, 106 : 17 - 25
  • [37] Making Rice Production More Environmentally-Friendly
    Uphoff, Norman
    Dazzo, Frank B.
    ENVIRONMENTS, 2016, 3 (02) : 1 - 7
  • [38] Environmentally-friendly transportation of limestone for cement production
    Soni, A.K.
    Bulk Solids Handling, 19 (03): : 329 - 336
  • [39] Environmentally Friendly Production of Unconventional Natural Gas Resources
    Haut, R. C.
    Burnett, D.
    Williams, T.
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGY 2009: BIOENERGY, RENEWABLES, STORAGE, GRID, WASTE AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2009, : 131 - 134
  • [40] Environmentally friendly production plant: Lean painting process
    Konstruktion, 2023, 75 (06): : IW8 - IW9