Production and Economic Effects of Environmentally Friendly Spring Wheat Production Technology

被引:7
|
作者
Haliniarz, Malgorzata [1 ]
Nowak, Anna [2 ]
Wozniak, Andrzej [1 ]
Sekutowski, Tomasz R. [3 ,4 ]
Kwiatkowski, Cezary A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Life Sci Lublin, Dept Weed Sci & Plant Cultivat, Lublin, Poland
[2] Univ Life Sci Lublin, Dept Econ & Agribusiness, Lublin, Poland
[3] Dept Weed Sci & Tillage Syst, Wroclaw, Poland
[4] Natl Res Inst, Inst Soil Sci & Plant Cultivat, Pulawy, Poland
来源
关键词
cultivation technology; economic results; grain quality; Triticum aestivum; yield;
D O I
10.15244/pjoes/77073
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to evaluate yield, grain quality characteristics, and cost-effectiveness of different crop protection methods in the cultivation of spring wheat using two levels of mineral fertilization of crops. The study shows that the combined application of the herbicide Lintur 70 WG (dicamba and triasulfuron) with ethephon or chlormequat chloride did not adversely affect spring wheat productivity. The highest yield was obtained in the treatment with intensive fertilization (5.18 t ha(-1)) and in the treatments with the application of herbicide in combination with ethephon (5.26 t ha(-1)). The chemical crop protection methods caused significant differences in grain test weight. In turn, mineral fertilization modified all the studied grain quality characteristics. An analysis of the indicators used to evaluate the economic effects of the spring wheat production technologies investigated showed a clear advantage of the lower intensity technology over the more intensive technologies, which should be associated with the high costs of mineral fertilization that were not compensated by the yields obtained. In analyzing the production and economic effects, treatment with the application of the herbicide in combination with ethephon under basic mineral fertilization conditions proved to be most beneficial.
引用
收藏
页码:1523 / 1532
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY OF BIODIESEL
    Karabesko, Pavels
    Strele, Maija
    Serzane, Rasma
    Jure, Mara
    INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE: ENGINEERING FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2009, : 161 - 164
  • [2] Development of environmentally friendly technology for the production of hydrogen
    Takasaki, K
    Kohno, M
    Hattori, T
    HYDROGEN ENERGY PROGRESS XI, VOLS 1-3, 1996, : 61 - 70
  • [3] Biological hydrogen production as an environmentally friendly technology
    Takasaki, K
    Otsuka, S
    Hattori, T
    HYDROGEN ENERGY PROGRESS XII, VOLS 1-3, 1998, : 153 - 158
  • [4] Technical and Economic Assessment of Environmentally Friendly Production Lines
    V. P. Malkin
    V. I. Kuzin
    Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 2001, 37 : 295 - 297
  • [5] Technical and economic assessment of environmentally friendly production lines
    Malkin, VP
    Kuzin, VI
    CHEMICAL AND PETROLEUM ENGINEERING, 2001, 37 (5-6) : 295 - 297
  • [6] Innovative environmentally friendly technology for copper(II) hydroxide production
    Milosavljevic, Milutin
    Babicev, Ljiljana
    Belosevic, Svetlana
    Danicic, Dunja
    Milosevic, Milena
    Rusmirovic, Jelena
    Marinkovic, Aleksandar
    HEMIJSKA INDUSTRIJA, 2018, 72 (06) : 363 - 370
  • [7] Electrochemical ozone production as an environmentally friendly technology for water treatment
    Franco, Debora V.
    Jardim, Wilson F.
    Boodts, Julien F. C.
    Da Silva, Leonardo M.
    CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER, 2008, 36 (01) : 34 - 44
  • [8] Environmentally Friendly Biofuel Production
    Frankowski, Jakub
    Czekala, Wojciech
    Energies, 2024, 17 (21)
  • [9] ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY PRODUCTION AND LABELLING
    Pavlinovic, Sladana
    MANAGEMENT-JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY MANAGEMENT ISSUES, 2013, 18 (02) : 21 - 35
  • [10] Environmentally Friendly Biogas Production
    Shamanskyi, Sergii
    Boichenko, Sergii
    2019 IEEE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY SMART SYSTEMS (2019 IEEE ESS), 2019, : 243 - 248