Body composition assessment in adults with cystic fibrosis: comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with skinfolds and bioelectrical impedance analysis

被引:36
|
作者
King, S
Wilson, J
Kotsimbos, T
Bailey, M
Nyulasi, I
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Alfred Hosp, Dept Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Alfred Hosp, Dept Nutr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Alfred Hosp, Dept Allergy Immunol & Resp Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[5] Monash Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cystic fibrosis; nutritional assessment; body composition; dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; bioelectrical impedance analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.nut.2005.04.005
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Objective: We compared body composition measurement in adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) by using non-invasive methods (skinfold thicknesses and bioelectrical impedance analysis [BIA]) with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Methods: Seventy-six adults with CF (mean age 29.9 +/- 7.9 y, mean body mass index 21.5 +/- 2.5 kg/m(2)) were studied. Body composition was measured to calculate fat-free mass (FFM) using DXA, the sum of four skinfold thicknesses, and BIA (predictive equations of Lukaski and of Segal). Results: Mean FFM values +/- standard deviation measured using DXA were 54.8 +/- 7.3 kg in men and 41.2 +/- 3.9 kg in women. Mean FFM values measured using BIA/Lukaski were 51.5 +/- 7.8 kg in men and 40.4 +/- 4.9 kg in women (P < 0.0005 for men, not significant for women for comparison with DXA). Mean FFM values measured using BIA/Segal were 54.2 +/- 7.5 kg for men and 44.1 +/- 5.9 kg for women (not significant for men, P < 0.0005 for women for comparison with DXA). Mean FFM values measured using skinfolds were significantly higher than those for FFM with DXA (57.2 +/- 7.2 kg in men, 43.3 +/- 4.3 kg in women, P < 0.0005 for comparison with DXA). The 95% limits of agreement with FFM using DXA were, for men and women, respectively, -8.3 to 1.7 kg and -6.4 to 4.8 kg for BIA/Lukaski, -4.8 to 3.6 kg and -3.1 to 8.9 kg for BIA/Segal, and -2.8 to 7.3 kg and -1.5 to 5.7 kg for skinfolds. Conclusion: This study suggests that skinfold thickness measurements and BIA will incorrectly estimate FFM in many adults with CF compared with DXA measurements of FFM. These methods have limited application in the assessment of body composition in individual adult patients with CF. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1087 / 1094
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Estimates of body composition with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in adults
    Li, Chaoyang
    Ford, Earl S.
    Zhao, Guixiang
    Balluz, Lina S.
    Giles, Wayne H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2009, 90 (06): : 1457 - 1465
  • [42] Comparison of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of percentage body fat in a large, healthy population
    Sun, G
    French, CR
    Martin, GR
    Younghusband, B
    Green, RC
    Xie, YG
    Mathews, M
    Barron, JR
    Fitzpatrick, DG
    Gulliver, W
    Zhang, HW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2005, 81 (01): : 74 - 78
  • [43] Measurement of body composition in people with HIV/AIDS: A comparison of bioelectrical impedance and skinfold anthropometry with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
    Batterham, MJ
    Garsia, R
    Greenop, P
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 1999, 99 (09) : 1109 - 1111
  • [44] A comparison of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis to measure total and segmental body composition in healthy young adults
    Siobhan Leahy
    Cian O’Neill
    Rhoda Sohun
    Philip Jakeman
    European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2012, 112 : 589 - 595
  • [45] A comparison of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis to measure total and segmental body composition in healthy young adults
    Leahy, Siobhan
    O'Neill, Cian
    Sohun, Rhoda
    Jakeman, Philip
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 112 (02) : 589 - 595
  • [46] Relationships among dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance and ultrasound measurements of body composition of swine
    Mitchell, Alva D.
    Scholz, Armin M.
    ARCHIV FUR TIERZUCHT-ARCHIVES OF ANIMAL BREEDING, 2009, 52 (01): : 28 - 39
  • [47] Body composition, as assessed by bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, in a healthy paediatric population
    Fors, H
    Gelander, L
    Bjarnason, R
    Albertsson-Wikland, K
    Bosaeus, I
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2002, 91 (07) : 755 - 760
  • [48] Comparison Of Body Composition Methods: Circumference And Bioelectrical Impedance To Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorpimetry
    Combest, Travis M.
    Tufano, James
    Lan, Michael
    Moon, Jordan
    MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2024, 56 (10) : 529 - 529
  • [49] Body composition assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
    Andreoli, A.
    Scalzo, G.
    Masala, S.
    Tarantino, U.
    Guglielmi, G.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2009, 114 (02): : 286 - 300
  • [50] Reliability and Agreement Assessment of Sarcopenia Diagnosis through Comparison of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry
    Lee, Jung Hun
    Kim, Hee Jin
    Han, Sanghun
    Park, Seong Jun
    Sim, Myongheon
    Lee, Kang Hyun
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (09)