Body composition assessment in adults with cystic fibrosis: comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with skinfolds and bioelectrical impedance analysis

被引:36
|
作者
King, S
Wilson, J
Kotsimbos, T
Bailey, M
Nyulasi, I
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Alfred Hosp, Dept Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Alfred Hosp, Dept Nutr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Alfred Hosp, Dept Allergy Immunol & Resp Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[5] Monash Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cystic fibrosis; nutritional assessment; body composition; dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; bioelectrical impedance analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.nut.2005.04.005
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Objective: We compared body composition measurement in adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) by using non-invasive methods (skinfold thicknesses and bioelectrical impedance analysis [BIA]) with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Methods: Seventy-six adults with CF (mean age 29.9 +/- 7.9 y, mean body mass index 21.5 +/- 2.5 kg/m(2)) were studied. Body composition was measured to calculate fat-free mass (FFM) using DXA, the sum of four skinfold thicknesses, and BIA (predictive equations of Lukaski and of Segal). Results: Mean FFM values +/- standard deviation measured using DXA were 54.8 +/- 7.3 kg in men and 41.2 +/- 3.9 kg in women. Mean FFM values measured using BIA/Lukaski were 51.5 +/- 7.8 kg in men and 40.4 +/- 4.9 kg in women (P < 0.0005 for men, not significant for women for comparison with DXA). Mean FFM values measured using BIA/Segal were 54.2 +/- 7.5 kg for men and 44.1 +/- 5.9 kg for women (not significant for men, P < 0.0005 for women for comparison with DXA). Mean FFM values measured using skinfolds were significantly higher than those for FFM with DXA (57.2 +/- 7.2 kg in men, 43.3 +/- 4.3 kg in women, P < 0.0005 for comparison with DXA). The 95% limits of agreement with FFM using DXA were, for men and women, respectively, -8.3 to 1.7 kg and -6.4 to 4.8 kg for BIA/Lukaski, -4.8 to 3.6 kg and -3.1 to 8.9 kg for BIA/Segal, and -2.8 to 7.3 kg and -1.5 to 5.7 kg for skinfolds. Conclusion: This study suggests that skinfold thickness measurements and BIA will incorrectly estimate FFM in many adults with CF compared with DXA measurements of FFM. These methods have limited application in the assessment of body composition in individual adult patients with CF. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1087 / 1094
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison Of Body Fat Assessment Procedures: Bioelectrical Impedance And Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry
    Turner, Lori W.
    Cole, Mary
    Wallace, Lorraine S.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2005, 37 : S298 - S299
  • [32] Practical Considerations for Body Composition Assessment of Adults with Class II/III Obesity Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis or Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
    Carlene A. Johnson Stoklossa
    Mary Forhan
    Raj S. Padwal
    Maria Cristina Gonzalez
    Carla M. Prado
    Current Obesity Reports, 2016, 5 : 389 - 396
  • [33] Validation of rapid 4-component body composition assessment with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis
    Ng, Bennett K.
    Liu, Yong L.
    Wang, Wei
    Kelly, Thomas L.
    Wilson, Kevin E.
    Schoeller, Dale A.
    Heymsfield, Steven B.
    Shepherd, John A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2018, 108 (04): : 708 - 715
  • [34] Bioelectrical impedance analysis to estimate body composition, and change in adiposity, in overweight and obese adolescents: comparison with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
    Ching S Wan
    Leigh C Ward
    Jocelyn Halim
    Megan L Gow
    Mandy Ho
    Julie N Briody
    Kelvin Leung
    Chris T Cowell
    Sarah P Garnett
    BMC Pediatrics, 14
  • [35] Comparison of segmental multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of body composition in a community-dwelling older population
    Kim, Miji
    Shinkai, Shoji
    Murayama, Hiroshi
    Mori, Seijiro
    GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 15 (08) : 1013 - 1022
  • [36] Bioelectrical impedance analysis to estimate body composition, and change in adiposity, in overweight and obese adolescents: comparison with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
    Wan, Ching S.
    Ward, Leigh C.
    Halim, Jocelyn
    Gow, Megan L.
    Ho, Mandy
    Briody, Julie N.
    Leung, Kelvin
    Cowell, Chris T.
    Garnett, Sarah P.
    BMC PEDIATRICS, 2014, 14
  • [37] Body Composition Comparison: Bioelectric Impedance Analysis with Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Adult Athletes
    Company, Joe
    Ball, Stephen
    MEASUREMENT IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND EXERCISE SCIENCE, 2010, 14 (03) : 186 - 201
  • [38] Comparison of body composition measures assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the United Kingdom Biobank
    Feng, Qi
    Besevic, Jelena
    Conroy, Megan
    Omiyale, Wemimo
    Lacey, Ben
    Allen, Naomi
    CLINICAL NUTRITION ESPEN, 2024, 63 : 214 - 225
  • [39] Accuracy of Commercial Body Composition Scales Versus Clinical Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
    Sander, Erica
    Ng, Bennett K.
    Yu, Eric
    Fan, Bo
    Liu, En Yong
    Kazemi, Leila
    Shepherd, John A.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2017, 49 (05): : 258 - 258
  • [40] Accuracy of Commercial Body Composition Scales Versus Clinical Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
    Sander, Erica
    Ng, Bennett K.
    Yu, Eric
    Fan, Bo
    Liu, En Yong
    Kazemi, Leila
    Shepherd, John A.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2015, 47 (05): : 258 - 258