Body composition assessment in adults with cystic fibrosis: comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with skinfolds and bioelectrical impedance analysis

被引:36
|
作者
King, S
Wilson, J
Kotsimbos, T
Bailey, M
Nyulasi, I
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Alfred Hosp, Dept Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Alfred Hosp, Dept Nutr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Alfred Hosp, Dept Allergy Immunol & Resp Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[5] Monash Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cystic fibrosis; nutritional assessment; body composition; dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; bioelectrical impedance analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.nut.2005.04.005
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Objective: We compared body composition measurement in adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) by using non-invasive methods (skinfold thicknesses and bioelectrical impedance analysis [BIA]) with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Methods: Seventy-six adults with CF (mean age 29.9 +/- 7.9 y, mean body mass index 21.5 +/- 2.5 kg/m(2)) were studied. Body composition was measured to calculate fat-free mass (FFM) using DXA, the sum of four skinfold thicknesses, and BIA (predictive equations of Lukaski and of Segal). Results: Mean FFM values +/- standard deviation measured using DXA were 54.8 +/- 7.3 kg in men and 41.2 +/- 3.9 kg in women. Mean FFM values measured using BIA/Lukaski were 51.5 +/- 7.8 kg in men and 40.4 +/- 4.9 kg in women (P < 0.0005 for men, not significant for women for comparison with DXA). Mean FFM values measured using BIA/Segal were 54.2 +/- 7.5 kg for men and 44.1 +/- 5.9 kg for women (not significant for men, P < 0.0005 for women for comparison with DXA). Mean FFM values measured using skinfolds were significantly higher than those for FFM with DXA (57.2 +/- 7.2 kg in men, 43.3 +/- 4.3 kg in women, P < 0.0005 for comparison with DXA). The 95% limits of agreement with FFM using DXA were, for men and women, respectively, -8.3 to 1.7 kg and -6.4 to 4.8 kg for BIA/Lukaski, -4.8 to 3.6 kg and -3.1 to 8.9 kg for BIA/Segal, and -2.8 to 7.3 kg and -1.5 to 5.7 kg for skinfolds. Conclusion: This study suggests that skinfold thickness measurements and BIA will incorrectly estimate FFM in many adults with CF compared with DXA measurements of FFM. These methods have limited application in the assessment of body composition in individual adult patients with CF. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1087 / 1094
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of body composition in Korean children aged 7-15
    Cho, Byung-Ki
    Lee, Jung-Suk
    Yu, Byung-Yeon
    Kang, Jee-Hyun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2007, 31 : S188 - S188
  • [22] Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, air displacement plethysmography and bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of body composition in morbidly obese women
    Bedogni, G.
    Agosti, F.
    De Col, A.
    Marazzi, N.
    Tagliaferri, A.
    Sartorio, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2013, 67 (11) : 1129 - 1132
  • [23] Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, air displacement plethysmography and bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of body composition in morbidly obese women
    G Bedogni
    F Agosti
    A De Col
    N Marazzi
    A Tagliaferri
    A Sartorio
    European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2013, 67 : 1129 - 1132
  • [24] COMPARISON BETWEEN DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY AND BIOELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE FOR BODY COMPOSITION MEASUREMENTS IN ADULTS WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE.
    Bellafronte, Natalia Tomborelli
    Vega-Piris, Lorena
    Garcia Chiarello, Paula
    Barril Cuadrado, Guillermina
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 35 : 148 - 148
  • [25] ESTIMATION OF BODY-COMPOSITION FROM BIOELECTRICAL-IMPEDANCE OF BODY SEGMENTS - COMPARISON WITH DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY
    STEWART, SP
    BRAMLEY, PN
    HEIGHTON, R
    GREEN, JH
    HORSMAN, A
    LOSOWSKY, MS
    SMITH, MA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1993, 69 (03) : 645 - 655
  • [26] Assessing Body Composition of Children and Adolescents Using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, Skinfolds, and Electrical Impedance
    Mooney, Angela
    Kelsey, Laurel
    Fellingham, Gilbert
    George, James
    Hager, Ron
    Myrer, William
    Vehrs, Pat
    MEASUREMENT IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND EXERCISE SCIENCE, 2011, 15 (01) : 2 - 17
  • [27] Body composition analysis in patients with cystic fibrosis. Comparison of 3 methods: Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance analysis, and skinfold measurements
    Beaumesnil, M.
    Chaillou, E.
    Wagner, A. -C.
    Rouquette, A.
    Audran, M.
    Ginies, J. -L.
    ARCHIVES DE PEDIATRIE, 2011, 18 (04): : 370 - 375
  • [28] Comparison of two bioelectrical impedance devices and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to evaluate body composition in heart failure
    Alves, F. D.
    Souza, G. C.
    Biolo, A.
    Clausell, N.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2014, 27 (06) : 632 - 638
  • [29] Comparison of body composition analytic methods of bioelectrical impedance with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in premenopausal Korean females
    Kim, HJ
    Song, NY
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2004, 18 (04): : A551 - A551
  • [30] Practical Considerations for Body Composition Assessment of Adults with Class II/III Obesity Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis or Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
    Stoklossa, Carlene A. Johnson
    Forhan, Mary
    Padwal, Raj S.
    Gonzalez, Maria Cristina
    Prado, Carla M.
    CURRENT OBESITY REPORTS, 2016, 5 (04): : 389 - 396