Machine Learning Classifiers for Modeling Soil Characteristics by Geophysics Investigations: A Comparative Study

被引:7
|
作者
Lim, Chee Soon [1 ]
Mohamad, Edy Tonnizam [1 ]
Motahari, Mohammad Reza [2 ]
Armaghani, Danial Jahed [3 ]
Saad, Rosli [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Engn, Geotrop Ctr Trop Geoengn, Sch Civil Engn, Skudai 81310, Malaysia
[2] Arak Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Arak 3815688349, Iran
[3] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[4] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Phys, Geophys Sect, George Town 11800, Malaysia
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 17期
关键词
soil classification; tree-based models; geophysics investigation; P-wave; S-wave; laboratory testing; NEURAL-NETWORK; PREDICTION; ROCK; OPTIMIZATION; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.3390/app10175734
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
To design geotechnical structures efficiently, it is important to examine soil's physical properties. Therefore, classifying soil with respect to geophysical parameters is an advantageous and popular approach. Novel, quick, cost, and time effective machine learning techniques can facilitate this classification. This study employs three kinds of machine learning models, including the Decision Tree, Artificial Neural Networks, and Bayesian Networks. The Decision tree models included the chi-square automatic interaction detection (CHAID), classification and regression trees (CART), quick, unbiased, and efficient statistical tree (QUEST), and C5; the Artificial Neural Networks models included Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and Radial Basis Function (RBF); and BN models included the Tree Augmented Naive (TAN) and Markov Blanket, which were employed to predict the soil classifications using geophysics investigations and laboratory tests. The performance of each model was assessed through the accuracy, stability and gains. The results showed that while the BAYESIANMARKOV model achieved the highest overall accuracy (100%) in training phase, this model achieved the lowest accuracy (34.21%) in testing phases. Thus, this model had the worst stability. The QUEST had the second highest overall training accuracy (99.12%) and had the highest overall testing accuracy (94.74%). Thus, this model was somewhat stable and had an acceptable overall training and testing accuracy to predict the soil characteristics. The future studies can use the findings of this paper as a benchmark to classify the soil characteristics and select the best machine learning technique to perform this classification.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparative study of machine learning classifiers for modeling travel mode choice
    Hagenauer, Julian
    Helbich, Marco
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 78 : 273 - 282
  • [2] Machine Learning Classifiers for Twitter Surveillance of Vaping: Comparative Machine Learning Study
    Visweswaran, Shyam
    Colditz, Jason B.
    O'Halloran, Patrick
    Han, Na-Rae
    Taneja, Sanya B.
    Welling, Joel
    Chu, Kar-Hai
    Sidani, Jaime E.
    Primack, Brian A.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (08)
  • [3] Comparative Study of Various Machine Learning Classifiers on Medical Data
    Karankar, Nilima
    Shukla, Pragya
    Agrawal, Niyati
    2017 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES (CSNT), 2017, : 267 - 271
  • [4] A comparative study of machine learning classifiers for risk prediction of asthma disease
    Ullah, Rahat
    Khan, Saranjam
    Ali, Hina
    Chaudhary, Iqra Ishtiaq
    Bilal, Muhammad
    Ahmad, Iftikhar
    PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2019, 28 : 292 - 296
  • [5] Prediction of measles patients using machine learning classifiers: a comparative study
    Robert Gyebi
    Gabriel Asare Okyere
    Emmanuel Kwaku Nakua
    Franklin Aseidu-Bekoe
    Jane Serwaa Akoto Nti
    Emmanuel Owusu Ansah
    Felix Agyemang Opoku
    Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 47 (1)
  • [6] Comparative Study of Machine Learning Classifiers for Modelling Road Traffic Accidents
    Bokaba, Tebogo
    Doorsamy, Wesley
    Paul, Babu Sena
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [7] A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Classifiers for Enhancing Knee Osteoarthritis Diagnosis
    Raza, Aquib
    Phan, Thien-Luan
    Li, Hung-Chung
    Hieu, Nguyen Van
    Nghia, Tran Trung
    Ching, Congo Tak Shing
    INFORMATION, 2024, 15 (04)
  • [8] A Comparative Study of Spam SMS Detection using Machine Learning Classifiers
    Gupta, Mehul
    Bakliwal, Aditya
    Agarwal, Shubhangi
    Mehndiratta, Pulkit
    2018 ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTEMPORARY COMPUTING (IC3), 2018, : 287 - 293
  • [9] Predicting Earthquake-Induced Soil Liquefaction Based on Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comparative Multi-Dataset Study
    Guo, Hongwei
    Zhuang, Xiaoying
    Chen, Jianfeng
    Zhu, Hehua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS, 2022, 19 (08)
  • [10] A Comparative Study of Machine Learning classifiers to analyze the precision of Myocardial Infarction prediction
    Khan, Razib Hayat
    Miah, Jonayet
    Nipun, Shah Ashisul Abed
    Islam, Majharul
    2023 IEEE 13TH ANNUAL COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION WORKSHOP AND CONFERENCE, CCWC, 2023, : 949 - 954