Clinical experience using Delta 4 phantom for pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance in modern radiotherapy

被引:9
|
作者
Srivastava, R. P. [1 ,3 ]
De Wagter, C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, C Heymanslaan 10,Radiotherapiepk, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol & Expt Canc Res, Ghent, Belgium
[3] Ctr Hosp Mouscron, Radiotherapy Assoc Meuse Picardie, Mouscron, Belgium
关键词
gamma index; intensity-modulated radiation therapy; multi-leaf collimator; quality assurance; volumetric-modulated arc therapy;
D O I
10.1017/S1460396918000572
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose In advanced radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the quality assurance (QA) process is essential. The aim of the study was to assure the treatment planning dose delivered during delivery of complex treatment plans. The QA standard is to perform patient-specific comparisons between planned doses and doses measured in a phantom. Materials and method The Delta 4 phantom (Scandidos, Uppsala, Sweden) has been used in this study. This device consists of diode matrices in two orthogonal planes inserted in a cylindrical acrylic phantom. Each diode is sampled per beam pulse so that the dose distribution can be evaluated on segment-by-segment, beam-by-beam, or as a composite plan from a single set of measurements. Ninety-five simple and complex radiotherapy treatment plans for different pathologies, planned using a treatment planning system (TPS) were delivered to the QA device. The planned and measured dose distributions were then compared and analysed. The gamma index was determined for different pathologies. Results The evaluation was performed in terms of dose deviation, distance to agreement and gamma index passing rate. The measurements were in excellent agreement between with the calculated dose of the TPS and the QA device. Overall, good agreement was observed between measured and calculated doses in most cases with gamma values above 1 in >95% of measured points. Plan results for each test met the recommended dose goals. Conclusion The delivery of IMRT and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans was verified to correspond well with calculated dose distributions for different pathologies. We found the Delta 4 device is accurate and reproducible. Although Delta4 appears to be a straightforward device for measuring dose and allows measure in real-time dosimetry QA, it is a complex device and careful quality control is required before its use.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 214
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluating the Quality of Patient-Specific Deformable Image Registration in Adaptive Radiotherapy Using a Digitally Enhanced Head and Neck Phantom
    Cagni, Elisabetta
    Botti, Andrea
    Orlandi, Matteo
    Galaverni, Marco
    Iotti, Cinzia
    Iori, Mauro
    Lewis, Geraint
    Spezi, Emiliano
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (19):
  • [42] A deformable phantom for quality assurance in 4D radiotherapy
    Margeanu, M.
    Heath, E.
    Stroian, G.
    Seuntjens, J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S80 - S81
  • [43] Quantitative Evaluation of Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Using Online Dosimetry System
    Jung, Jae-Yong
    Shin, Young-Ju
    Sohn, Seung-Chang
    Min, Jung-Whan
    Kim, Yon-Lae
    Kim, Dong-Su
    Choe, Bo-Young
    Suh, Tae-Suk
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 72 (02) : 312 - 319
  • [44] Ethos Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Outcome Prediction Using Machine Learning
    Witztum, A.
    Hink, J.
    Wall, P. D. H.
    Neylon, J.
    Solberg, T. D.
    Lamb, J. M.
    Valdes, G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (10) : 7706 - 7707
  • [45] Evaluation of DVH Based Patient-Specific Quality-Assurance Using COMPASS
    Sharma, S.
    Subramani, V.
    Chander, S.
    Bhaskar, S.
    Pathy, S.
    Kumar, P.
    Gopishankar, N.
    Thulkar, S.
    Singh, M.
    Binjola, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E601 - E602
  • [46] Quantitative evaluation of patient-specific quality assurance using online dosimetry system
    Jae-Yong Jung
    Young-Ju Shin
    Seung-Chang Sohn
    Jung-Whan Min
    Yon-Lae Kim
    Dong-Su Kim
    Bo-Young Choe
    Tae-Suk Suh
    Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2018, 72 : 312 - 319
  • [47] Assessment of using a gamma index analysis for patient-specific quality assurance in Japan
    Anetai, Yusuke
    Sumida, Iori
    Kumazaki, Yu
    Kito, Satoshi
    Kurooka, Masahiko
    Ueda, Yoshihiro
    Otani, Yuki
    Narita, Yuichiro
    Kawamorita, Ryu
    Akita, Kazuhiko
    Kato, Takahiro
    Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 23 (10):
  • [48] Helical Tomotherapy Patient Specific Quality Assurance in An Anthropomorphic Phantom
    Neeley, M.
    Harris, C.
    Charara, Y.
    Ramsey, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [49] Towards Quality Assurance of 4D Radiotherapy Using a Deformable Lung Phantom
    Serban, M.
    Alexander, A.
    Seuntjens, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [50] The development and testing of a novel spherical radiotherapy phantom system for the commissioning and patient-specific quality assurance of mono-isocentric multiple mets SRS plans
    McKenna, John T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (01) : 105 - 113